i understand the situation and how it came to be.
i hope we all learn from it.
even during better times,
to be sure,
health check-up with laboratory testing, before employment...
i hope the rest of the family are all asymptomatic...
if they are, think of it this way...
"na-bakunahan na kayo".
i hope the mom pulls thru.
Last edited by dr. d; May 29th, 2020 at 11:02 PM.
New normal in interpreting the results...
Sent from my SM-N970F using Tapatalk
last comment ko na ito tungkol diyan
paano naging opinion ung sinabi ko ang linaw linaw sinabi niya akala niya safe na pag MECQ
tagalogin ko ung sinabi niya
"mula ECQ nasa bahay lang kami"
"noong nag MECQ akala namin wala na panganib kaya tinawagan ko ung katulong"
At the end of the day, we should never let our guards down, at least until we are inoculated. I bet the vaccine for Covid-19 would be one of the required vaccines for infants. And it will be a required shot for adults that needs to be updated regularly like flu shots.
Whats worrying is the family thought it's safe because the quarantine was relaxed. Who's to say there are people who wouldn't translate it the same way? Lighter quarantine = safer to go out? Media should make people understand that the lockdown was for our healthcare system to prepare, not to reduce or fight the virus.
Sent from my Mi 9T Pro using Tapatalk
Buti nabasa ko ito. I was gonna start pa naman na papa renovate yun isang room next week para ma convert na to a proper home office. Strip-off the built-cabinets, replace the laminate floorings paint the wall and fix kung anong masira while demolishing the cabinets.
Pero ok lang pag sa labas lang bahay magpahawa? Wala lalapit sa gagawa, I'm gonna have the gate converted to a folding type.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
for me the easing of lockdown from ECQ to MECQ to GCQ has more to do with reopening the economy than with getting the virus under control
so i wouldn't have interpreted ECQ to MECQ = safe
it's unfortunate that there are people who interpreted it that way
--
in fairness the lockdown was able to slow down the virus
if there was no lockdown the growth of cases would be expontential (1 to 3, 3 to 9, 9 to 27, and so on)
the lockdown slowed it to sub-exponential growth
Last edited by uls; May 30th, 2020 at 09:12 AM.
dahil sa thread na ito mas well-informed tayo than most people
thanks to Monseratto's daily updates, alam natin mataas ang infection rate sa mga squatters' area
ung mga stay-out na katulong, laborer etc saan sila nakatira?
hindi ba sa mga ganyan area?
so after ma-ease ang lockdown balik trabaho sila ano mangyayari?
diba?
well outdoor is better than indoor
basta kailangan naka mask sila
tapos shadow ikaw dapat naka mask and face shield pag kausap mo sila at a distance
Hey uls. How are you? Just my 2c:
For me the shift to GCQ has 100% to do with the economy and politics and not containment of the virus. If we go by the data, we should be going the opposite way back to ECQ because the number of infections has risen sharply the past few days.
It's the government's responsibility to be clear in their messaging so that there are few possible misinterpretations. Not everyone can read and understand well, or read between the lines. They shouldn't have to. But in this case it seems to be a conscious effort to give a false sense of security just so the economy can reopen. And that is dangerous.it's unfortunate that there are people who interpreted it that way
Haircuts pde na from June 7...
READ: Trade Secretary Ramon Lopez says the IATF has OK’d the opening of barbershops and salons at 30% in GCQ areas, starting June 7. | via *bernadettereyes
![]()