Results 41 to 50 of 437
-
-
June 28th, 2007 12:44 PM #42
Housekeeping Announcement #1:
Please be advised that all posts on 3-WHEELERS have been moved to the "3-Wheelers" thread at http://tsikot.yehey.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39206.
Thanks.
Ref: http://tsikot.yehey.com/forums/showp...9&postcount=29
-
June 28th, 2007 01:25 PM #43
From http://www.autoindustriya.com/yabbse...sg%25msg_id%25
"way back in the 80's there was a company named conge cars that designed and manufactured cars from the ground up. binky victa was the name of the guy behind it. he made pick-ups, vans, sports coupes. he even had a mid-engine model named the aniano. his front-mid/rear drive sports coupe was also used in slalom races back then and was very competitive. it was also raced in rally events which were big at that time. all his designs used tubular space frames with fiberglass body shells. i remember that the owner of gene's bistro owned 2 of conge's sports coupes."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I remember seeing those Conge cars at the Transhow and I was amazed at what Binky Victa was able to do on a limited budget. There was one fiberglass bodied minivan type vechicle that had aerodynamic styling (and this was a time when AUVs were boxy). Even today, this Conge minivan is miles ahead of the MVPMAP PhUV).
Maybe some Tsikoteers should contact Binky to learn about designing and building cars. And pay homage to this forgotten Filipino pioneer who dared to dream big but failed.
-
-
-
June 28th, 2007 03:48 PM #46Originally Posted by ghosthunterOriginally Posted by wildthing
I would also want to make it known that I have been part of a vehicle design team and we built two very different running prototype cars in the past and that my experience there might be of some value to future projects.Last edited by ghosthunter; June 28th, 2007 at 04:01 PM.
-
June 28th, 2007 03:56 PM #47
Actually it was a half serious message. Not mad at all. It was based on what I have read before in Compact Sports Car magazine where a guy built a twin engined car. He even turbo charged both engines and used methanol as fuel of choice.
Anyway, the proposed vehicle would be a demonstration vehicle and not something practical for the road.
Well, I was merely pointing out that you dont need a Pinoy designed engine to make it a Pinoy Sports car.
-
June 28th, 2007 04:29 PM #48
That's extremely doable... and you don't even need a RWD 4AGE. Since you're putting two engines in, you put two FWD engines (both AT), one in front and one in the back.
Honda did this way back in the 80's. A little known project called CRX2. It was a CRX with two B16s (not sure, but I think it was)... it was a mad thing, really... with the second engine and the fuel tanks taking up the entire back half of the car. The reviewer recounted at some point the reactions of the gas boy when he asked him to fill up the other gas tank.
Having both engines mated to automatics made it deviously simple... you could attach both engines to the same shifter and gas pedal with no problem.
------
From donbuggy's quoted thread:
http://www.kitcarmag.com/featuredveh...ered_roadster/
This is the kind of thing I was talking about. A tube frame sports car with this... or even with a mere 110 hp 1.6 cut out of a wrecked compact. I'd estimate a tube-frame vehicle with an engine like that, with the requisite breathing mods, could do 0-100 km/h in just seven seconds.
The fiberglass would be the last part to put into place. All we'd need to do is construct the tube-frame, source a compact car front-cut and extra suspension components, and start testing for weight balance, handling balance, suspension set-ups and brake balancing.
I'm betting that even the pathetic engine, brakes and suspension from a Corolla or Sentra taxi would be spectacular in a tube-frame car, and the whole thing could be put together for around half-a-million or less using surplus parts.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
June 29th, 2007 12:17 AM #49
Just some observations and suggestions to keep this thread focused and moving:
(1) ON FIRMING UP THE DESIGN BRIEF. I sense that the Design Brief needs more content and firmness. This whole project depends on that. It also helps avoid circuitous and contentious posts. Here's what a simple Design Brief looks like - http://www.wheels.australiandesign.o..._designers.asp
Why don't wildthing, ghosthunter and niky formulate a decision flowchart (or draft a questionnaire) that can lead to a firm Design Brief, and allow items and issues to be settled by participants within the forum/thread. There's no hurry, is there? That's doable. And that's opensourcing already. Besides, it provides a great opportunity for others to lurk-n-learn along the way.
If you want to fast-track this process, put in the specs already, and post the tentative brief for reactions. I suggest an EB, if you guys are really serious.
(2) ON PLATFORM AND BODY STYLE CONCEPTS. It's not really possible to finalize body style and rolling chassis Concepts without the Design Brief. However, there is no harm in studying existing styles and rolling chassis.
In the meantime, Tsikoteers are free to post their preferences, findings, or suggestions. And of course, preliminary/concept sketches. Wildthing himself mentioned "a miniature Koenigsegg" in an earlier post. Would your vision of "Alamid" (=fox) approximate these?
wildthing, how mini is your idea of miniature? Perhaps you can start quantifying. The science is called Ergonomics.
Take a look at the Formula Zero.
Would that be mini-enough (sans the Hydrogen engine, of course)?
(3) FABRICATOR'S SHORT CUT. To really short-cut the process, as ghosthunter suggested, you can improve on one of the best existing chassis designs. Any improvement or variation (of the Elyse's frame) by Filipinos makes it Filipino enough, IMO. I don't see any IP issues in transforming a tub chassis to a space frame.
A good enthusiast's reference is "Chassis Engineering" by Herb Adams. But even that I think requires engineering (math) ability to translate to proto. It would be good to have an chassis engineer on the team if you're going to do that, or you will soon discover that the short cut is not that short.
Fact is, there is no short cut to designing a car. Unless perhaps you're a maverick Filipino with an instinct for it.
(4) MODELER'S SCALE-UP. Another approach is to study the chassis of scale model RC cars that approximate the vehicle you have in mind, scale it up to the ergonomic dimensions, make the necessary modifications, analyzing it for strength and stability. No shortcuts here either. You will still need an engineer or a seasoned fabricator on your team to optimize strength, weight, steering, brakes, etc. ...
Fact is, there is no way to build a car without teamwork.
-
June 29th, 2007 12:30 AM #50
Oops, sorry wildthing, I forgot you specified 2 pax.
This is available from China, and is classified as a go-kart.
Looks more like a dune buggy, though.
http://www.ecplaza.net/tradeleads/se...kart.html#none
3M Color Stable series are all above 50% TSER. RFID readable through the tint, stays good for...
What's the best car tint brand and color?