All New 2013 Toyota Vios (3rd Gen)

[ice15]

I still like the original body of the vios gen 3 (2013-2016).

same here. I like the looks of the original version

I had one, an entry level 2014 1.3j that guzzles fuel like a thristy expedition 5km/li.

my sister had the first batches din, the non-dual-vvti... ang lakas din sa gas.

kaya ngayon tuwang tuwa sya sa consumption ng HR-V nya.

IMO, underpowered talaga yung NA 1.3L engine for our modern needs.

[dr. d]

my sister had the first batches din, the non-dual-vvti... ang lakas din sa gas.

kaya ngayon tuwang tuwa sya sa consumption ng HR-V nya.

IMO, underpowered talaga yung NA 1.3L engine for our modern needs.

i remember the reviews of this car, back then.
malakas nga raw ang fuel consumption, which, in this day and age, i could not understand why so.

[thearsenal1205]

IMO, underpowered talaga yung NA 1.3L engine for our modern needs.

even dual vvti 1.3l (1NR-FE) underpowered as well, sana mag ka turbo engine option (raize turbo engine) yung next gen vios in future updates

[dr. d]

even dual vvti 1.3l (1NR-FE) underpowered as well, sana mag ka turbo engine option (raize turbo engine) yung next gen vios in future updates

my 1.10 pesos' worth,
"underpowered is relative."
if power is what's on one's mind, there are other models to choose from.
heh heh.

[Yatta]

i remember the reviews of this car, back then.
malakas nga raw ang fuel consumption, which, in this day and age, i could not understand why so.

Body was too heavy and not a match for the engine, 1.5L was the sweet spot. I remember our neighbor in the 2000s had both a 1.8L Revo and an Expedition. He preferred using the Expe as the former actually used up more gas.

Anyway, I don't like the new look. It reminds me of a fat gecko or salamander.

[Dr.Kamiya]

Body was too heavy and not a match for the engine, 1.5L was the sweet spot. I remember our neighbor in the 2000s had both a 1.8L Revo and an Expedition. He preferred using the Expe as the former actually used up more gas.

Anyway, I don't like the new look. It reminds me of a fat gecko or salamander.

We had the 2.0li gas Revo. It used significantly more gas than my 4.0li Ford Explorer

[baludoy]

Why is that? A/ t tranny was still primitive then?

Sent from my RMX3690 using Tsikot Forums mobile app

[Dr.Kamiya]

low tech engine + low tech tranny + heavy body = gas guzzler

unearthed this old thread about it. everyone concurs it's a drunkard: Fuel Consumption of Revo

[carxynogen]

Body was too heavy and not a match for the engine, 1.5L was the sweet spot. I remember our neighbor in the 2000s had both a 1.8L Revo and an Expedition. He preferred using the Expe as the former actually used up more gas.

Anyway, I don't like the new look. It reminds me of a fat gecko or salamander.

I remember when the topic is tibayan, Revo daw panalo or the old model toyota.
Bakit daw ang nipis na ng kaha ng mga new models ngayon.
They missed those days daw na super tibay ang kaha.
Siguro naisip nila to dahil they don't own one, they only touched and tested the unit.
Sa sobrang tibay at kapal ng kaha, nagsuffer din fuel economy.

[dr. d]

I remember when the topic is tibayan, Revo daw panalo or the old model toyota.
Bakit daw ang nipis na ng kaha ng mga new models ngayon.
They missed those days daw na super tibay ang kaha.
Siguro naisip nila to dahil they don't own one, they only touched and tested the unit.
Sa sobrang tibay at kapal ng kaha, nagsuffer din fuel economy.

in my opinion,
they are now lightening the newer cars, to favor fuel economy and cheaper cost of manufacture.
also, as newer cars are expected to be "safer" and "more frugal to operate", manufacturers now prefer their cars to be completely replaced on a regular basis.
planned obsolescence.