
Originally Posted by
parakitoJDM
Here's my own view why i think this car (2nd. Gen Honda Jazz/FIt) is pricey....
1. Imported Car:
1-1: Transport cost fm. Thailand to Philippines. (remember City & Civic is Assembled in HC PhilIppines!)
1-2: (pre AFTA) Tax to imported CBU.
2. Design itself: There are other aspects of the Car that Costs money - other than the Engine...
2-1: Ultra Seats: this alone Costs some serious dough...the One-Touch Dive Down seats
is going to cost way more money than the Civic's Fixed seats!
i will have to agree and disagree with some points.
the seats and other accesories will cost money, but it doesnt cost much, these features like 60/40 seats are also availble in other small cars.
these should not cost that much in terms of real cost of material.
[SIZE=3][/SIZE]
2-2: Vehicle Information Display: this car is equipped with Trip computer as well as
Instant and Average Fuel Consumption that you don't get in the Civic. Hey this one is not Free of Charge...
they features are nice,suited for the Fc conscious people.
2-3: Temperature Sensor / Display: this one also cost some money....
2-4: winker on the Side Mirror.
2-5: auto retract / powered Side mirrors (these are not available on any of the 1.8V/S)
2-6: Paddle Shifter, also costs money! (these are not available on any of the 1.8V/S. only for the Auto 2.0li model)
u mentioned the features of the jazz but u didnt mention what the lowest level civic has-it has better dash board.its a bigger car,bigger car means safer car.that dashboard alone i think will cost more than those features that u mentioned or at least the same.
2-6: Comparing Jazz 1.5V (5A/T) vs. Civic 1.8V (5MT w/o Airbag) is a moot point because of
differing class & equipment level....
i have to disagree with u on this, it is precisely it is on a different class/level thats why their prices should not be close. jazz is small car and the other is medium car.
the top end of jazz is just too expensive with only those features.the lowest end of jazz is also not worth it for that amount.the bottom line is if they would charge those amount, then it would have to have more features, not just those currently featured.
so if u value more on ENGINE performance, then better get the Civic!
about:
>>-vtec-more power=more Fuel consumption vs idsi
actually Japan MITI's rating of the old 1.3iDsi vs. new 1.3i-Vtec both using CVT . show's a rating of 24km/li.
Though its dis-appointing they were not able to improve it (like what they did for the FD Civic), in reality its the same.
well its nice to hear that, bottom line is FC.
And about your SA's explanation why CVT was dropped, its not because it will cost more (i think that's how they were
Oriented how to answer by HCPI) its because Honda doesn't want a repeat of the same problem with old way...
i think that is also their alibi.as i said they can have cvt in the old city with that price,why not include it here?
that is
introducing New Unproven technology in the market outside of Japan. Also the new 5A/T loses some in Fuel Efficiency
department, at least its proven to be more reliable than the CVT.....esp. the new variant in JDM's CVT + Torque Converter....
those are New Unproven technology that may bring harm to Honda's reputation if things are not Done Right!.
u are saying the cvt is not reliable? after reading some threads on tsikot,it seems there were some problems,and its scary, CVT trans cost 285k.wow.
but it is more unrealible compared to the traditional AT? it needs more maintenance though.i dont know how much traditional AT cost, but i think it wont be far.
And your Comment on the new "Altis" having an old engine....(correct me if i'm wrong) i know Toyota has upgraded it
as it now has Variable Valve Timing control for Both Intake & Exhaust side.... the previous one also have for INTAKE side...
and its actually quite Fuel Efficient. and please read thru "http://www.canadiandriver.com/" 50 liter challenge.
the New Corolla (Altis for South east asia...) 1.8li + (antiquated) 4A/T was more fuel efficient than the Civic's 1.8li + 5MT! UNBELIEVABLE!
I think other than (Engine/Gearing) Weight of the car, Rolling Resistance , Aerodynamic Drag play a key role in Fuel Consumption!