2012 Ford Ranger

[sparcom2]

Sir sparcom, I big sabihin magiging LIMITED EDITION na ang XLT AT nyan? :-)

Yes ser, i think tataas ang resale value ng XLT AT.

[pinoyfighter]

Sir jhoel, if budget is not a problem sayo... I suggest you get the 3.2 na. Believe me d ka magsisi bro :-)

Sir malaki ba matitipid sa gas pag 2.2 kesa 3.2 o konti lang din?

[sparcom2]

Sir malaki ba matitipid sa gas pag 2.2 kesa 3.2 o konti lang din?

If icocompute mo long term let say 5 years malaki ang matitipid mo. I have 2 friends who own a 2.2 and 3.2 wildtrak, sabi nila malakas sa FC ang 3.2 vs 2.2

[twistan_bebe]

mga sir ask lang, was checking ford ranger on chino roces ave. sabi ng sa dun yung xl daw which is 2.2 m/t 4x4 variant nila wala daw dalang bedliner? saka no tubular bars for side step and also naka 16 rims lang sya. while the xlt 4x2 m/t nila has a bedliner, may side step siya angd is equipped with 17 inch alloys. can anyone confirm po if this is standard sa lahat ng casa. thanks mga sir

Ang XL model ng Ranger ay mostly for fleet use. Yan ang bare model ng Ranger pero kaya mas mataas ang price niyan kaysa XLT na mt o at ay dahil 4x4 siya. Sa pagkakaalam ko hindi din siya naka VGT hindi ko lang talaga confirmed yun. Sabi sa akin dati wala daw kasamang bedliner ang XL model pero try to request baka may maibigay sila sa iyo. And wala talagang tubular bars yang ganyang model.

[twistan_bebe]

Sir malaki ba matitipid sa gas pag 2.2 kesa 3.2 o konti lang din?

Kapag city driving, mas makatitipid ka sa 2.2 engine. Kapag long drive o steep drive mas makatitipid ka sa 3.2. Syempre mas malakas ang power ng 3.2 kaya madali lang para sa makina ang kumuha ng power to boost your acceleration. Pero kapag sa EDSA ka nagddrive at 3.2 gamit mo araw-araw kawawa ka sa FC. Kaya kapag city driving recommended ang 1.3 engine displacement kasi matipid sa gas. Pero kapag dinala mo ito sa highway o steep hill kamote na sila. hehehe

[twistan_bebe]

Sino ang mga nakapunta na ng MIAS dito? kumusta? Madali na bang makabili ng Ford Ranger Wildtrak ngayon? o pahirapan pa din gaya ng XLT model?

[zamoco_08]

Sir malaki ba matitipid sa gas pag 2.2 kesa 3.2 o konti lang din?

Base sa experience ko sir between my Mazda bt-50 3.2 AT and ranger 2.2 xlt AT, in city driving Medyo matipid ranger Kasi nga almost always low gear Lang takbo natin and smaller displacement engine nya. But in express ways and out of town trip matipid bt-50 Kasi always high gears na takbo. Konting apak sa gas pedal harurot agad and less stress angine ng 3.2.
Hindi ko Lang alam if magiging the same FC ng 3.2 ranger and bt-50. But stil m getting the wildtrak 3.2 and letting go the bt-50. Who would care of the FCs if your riding on the wildtrak 3.2? Hehehehe....

[numbah5]

Sino ang mga nakapunta na ng MIAS dito? kumusta? Madali na bang makabili ng Ford Ranger Wildtrak ngayon? o pahirapan pa din gaya ng XLT model?

Sabi ng nakausap kong SA na taga Ford Cainta during the MIAS, pag bank PO may 8-10% D.I. kung gustong makakuha agad ng 3.2 Wildtrak. Mas madali daw yung 2.2 Wildtrak. Di ko sure if that's the case with other dealers.

[sparcom2]

Sabi ng nakausap kong SA na taga Ford Cainta during the MIAS, pag bank PO may 8-10% D.I. kung gustong makakuha agad ng 3.2 Wildtrak. Mas madali daw yung 2.2 Wildtrak. Di ko sure if that's the case with other dealers.

8-10% D.I.

[jhoel_e]

Sir jhoel, if budget is not a problem sayo... I suggest you get the 3.2 na. Believe me d ka magsisi bro :-)

Ok ser zamoco,,,i will consider your advice,thanx

[JX290]

mga sir ask lang, was checking ford ranger on chino roces ave. sabi ng sa dun yung xl daw which is 2.2 m/t 4x4 variant nila wala daw dalang bedliner? saka no tubular bars for side step and also naka 16 rims lang sya. while the xlt 4x2 m/t nila has a bedliner, may side step siya angd is equipped with 17 inch alloys. can anyone confirm po if this is standard sa lahat ng casa. thanks mga sir

Yes sir, ganyan if yung xl 4x4 and No voice control, no steering wheel audio controls.

[Turbonitecs]

8-10% D.I.

Sobra yan sir. Been to MIAS last saturday nakapagtest drive pa ako ng WT 2.2MT and the SA told me na 3% DI pero iwoworkout daw nya sa 1%. Nagpareserve na rin ako kaya lang wala binigay na date kung kelan yong unit ko.

[Turbonitecs]

Sino ang mga nakapunta na ng MIAS dito? kumusta? Madali na bang makabili ng Ford Ranger Wildtrak ngayon? o pahirapan pa din gaya ng XLT model?

Sir maganda mga babes sa MIAS. hehe. Wildtrak pahirapan pa din kumuha walang binigay na date yong SA ko kahit may reservation na ako ang sabi di daw mahaba pa ang pila nagsisimula pa lang humaba.

[jut703]

Guys meron ba sa inyo na nakakapansin na parang nag ga grind sa transmission sa mga rangers nyo ( manual transmission ) specially sa 2nd gear and 3rd gear? Kahit gano kaganda apak ko sa clutch parang lageng may sumasabit eh, sanay naman po ako sa manual kase almost 10 yrs na akong umaapak ng clutch hehehe

Felt this too when I test drove the Ranger. It's not that bad, but it's not what I'd call smooth. Closer to the tranny of an APV than an FD Civic.

Try not to force the gear into the slot. Give it a gentle push and wait for the gear to slot in, then blend clutch...HTH

That sucks if I have to be slow with my shifting. I hate taking more than a few tenths of a second on shifts, especially when I'm in a hurry. Ayoko kasi nung manual na parang every change gear, ang tagal nakabitaw sa gas so the car shifts balance forward, then the weight shifts to the rear again as you slot into the next gear. Parang FX driver lang eh, it feels so rough and uncomfortable especially for passengers. Kaya I try to make my shifts as quick as possible. It shouldn't be bad for the transmission as long as the clutch is fully depressed, but in my experience with our APV, ang gaspang talaga ng shifts. Sa Ranger din parang ganun but to a lesser degree.

[jut703]

Kapag city driving, mas makatitipid ka sa 2.2 engine. Kapag long drive o steep drive mas makatitipid ka sa 3.2. Syempre mas malakas ang power ng 3.2 kaya madali lang para sa makina ang kumuha ng power to boost your acceleration. Pero kapag sa EDSA ka nagddrive at 3.2 gamit mo araw-araw kawawa ka sa FC. Kaya kapag city driving recommended ang 1.3 engine displacement kasi matipid sa gas. Pero kapag dinala mo ito sa highway o steep hill kamote na sila. hehehe

Care to share actual figures? Theoretically the bigger engine should be less stressed, yes. But also consider that even at lower revs, the larger size of the engine makes it inherently thirstier. So it's possible that even if the bigger engine is running only at 20% power while the smaller engine at 40%, the latter can still consume less gas even if you push it higher because it's inherently more efficient.

Case in point - the 1.6 and 2.0 Altis. In the city, naturally, the 1.6 Altis is more efficient (8-9 km/L vs 6-7 km/L for the 2.0). But in the highway, if your theory applies, then the 2-liter Altis should be more economical. My best highway FC? 13 km/L. That's with a light foot at 90-100 kph. At the same speed using a 1.6 Altis, I get over 15 km/L.

So unless you have actual experience and figures to show, no, a bigger engine is not always more efficient at highway speeds.

[twistan_bebe]

Care to share actual figures? Theoretically the bigger engine should be less stressed, yes. But also consider that even at lower revs, the larger size of the engine makes it inherently thirstier. So it's possible that even if the bigger engine is running only at 20% power while the smaller engine at 40%, the latter can still consume less gas even if you push it higher because it's inherently more efficient.

Case in point - the 1.6 and 2.0 Altis. In the city, naturally, the 1.6 Altis is more efficient (8-9 km/L vs 6-7 km/L for the 2.0). But in the highway, if your theory applies, then the 2-liter Altis should be more economical. My best highway FC? 13 km/L. That's with a light foot at 90-100 kph. At the same speed using a 1.6 Altis, I get over 15 km/L.

So unless you have actual experience and figures to show, no, a bigger engine is not always more efficient at highway speeds.

Yes bigger engine tend to consume more gas than smaller engine displacement. But consider other factors that bigger engine gives you less stress on the engine when revving coz it gives you the sudden acceleration when you need it for over taking and especially driving on steep roads. If you do it on smaller engine it takes a lot of rev to compensate the speed you need. The more it stresses the engine. Ang yes I do experienced it. Mine is a 3.2li engine and my frirnd has 2li engine. We drove from manila to cam norte and yes we consume almost the same amount of diesel. But, driving on that zigzag road, full of slow trucks and buses that loads and unloads its passenger on the side of the highway made my driving a lot easier compared to my friend. Saved more time, less stress on the engine and giving you the power when you need it without sacrificing your fuel consumption.

[jut703]

Yes bigger engine tend to consume more gas than smaller engine displacement. But consider other factors that bigger engine gives you less stress on the engine when revving coz it gives you the sudden acceleration when you need it for over taking and especially driving on steep roads. If you do it on smaller engine it takes a lot of rev to compensate the speed you need. The more it stresses the engine. Ang yes I do experienced it. Mine is a 3.2li engine and my frirnd has 2li engine. We drove from manila to cam norte and yes we consume almost the same amount of diesel. But, driving on that zigzag road, full of slow trucks and buses that loads and unloads its passenger on the side of the highway made my driving a lot easier compared to my friend. Saved more time, less stress on the engine and giving you the power when you need it without sacrificing your fuel consumption.

So how different exactly is the consumption of the 2.2L from the 3.2L in highway conditions? km/L please?

[Rovin99]

Magkano po ba yung chrome rollbar ng Ranger?

[clairenceh]

^

Gusto ko rin nito pati yung roll-up cover or roller lid ba yun.. Pwede ba yun nakalagay yang dalawa?

Magkano pala yang roll bar? Pati yung roller lid? Salamat.

May nakita pala akong Ford Ranger na white sa Iloilo with raptor grill. Ganda pero white yung F O R D. mas maganda siguro kung black lang :D

[Caracter]

In my opinion if 3.2 & 2.2 are both automatic and they share the same drivetrain then they should probably have the same RPM at crusing speed. The
2.2 has RPM of 1,700 * 100 kph, for those who have 3.2 what is its RPM * 100 kph? I heard that both have the same top speed of 180 kph, the advantage of the 3.2 is that it can reach that speed earlier because of more power but to produce greater power it would also require more fuel to burn.