Magnafuel review?

**oj88** · June 26th, 2017 11:15 PM

Originally Posted by pyramid00

Sir OJ88, Pls research: ijmadotcom, go to achieves (1) vol 1, no 7 (2013) - effect of magnetic field on fuel and engine performance

(2) vol 2, no 2 (2014) Reduction of harmful emissions in Internal combustion Engine

(3) vol 2, no 2 (2014) modification of engine to HHO

(4) vol 3, no 2 (2015) Ionization by magnetic field

If you say that this is BS, email ijmadotcom and tell them what's on your mind.

Oh I'm sorry.... I still think it's....

**pyramid00** · June 27th, 2017 01:43 PM

[QUOTE=oj88;2846696]Oh I'm sorry.... I still think i

I am sorry, too, OJ, if even a scientific journal can't convince you. You are entitled to your opinion.

I think that car manufacturers do not want to put this devices on their new car models is it is too simple. Baka nahihiya lang sila dahil nabasa nila sa wikileaks na these devices do not work kaya panindigan na nila.

Parang si trump, who was impossible to win, but when he did; he is not potus. Baka ganuon lang. A case of ego, emo.

**StockEngine** · June 27th, 2017 03:55 PM

youre not convincing anybody...

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app

**lowslowbenz** · June 27th, 2017 04:09 PM

Ummm ...

No.

**oj88** · June 27th, 2017 04:24 PM

[QUOTE=pyramid00;2846829]

Originally Posted by oj88

Oh I'm sorry.... I still think i

I am sorry, too, OJ, if even a scientific journal can't convince you. You are entitled to your opinion.

I think that car manufacturers do not want to put this devices on their new car models is it is too simple. Baka nahihiya lang sila dahil nabasa nila sa wikileaks na these devices do not work kaya panindigan na nila.

Parang si trump, who was impossible to win, but when he did; he is not potus. Baka ganuon lang. A case of ego, emo.

Let me show you why it's full of BS.... Take the following graph as an example of their lousy work...

The test permanent magnets were clearly identified earlier in said 'journal' as being 2k, 4k, 6k, and 9k Gauss, respectively. What do you notice in the graph above?

Sirit na?

Any self-respecting grade school student would see a mysterious 'dip' between 6k and 8k Gauss. How in tarnation did they deduce that there's going to be a dip when they don't even have a 7k Gauss magnet around? And they didn't care to explain it either.

And that's just one of the more glaring snafu I would care to mention.

It's a scam. The magnet only works to steal your hard-earned money from your pockets.

**Yatta** · June 27th, 2017 04:53 PM

[QUOTE=pyramid00;2846829]

Originally Posted by oj88

Oh I'm sorry.... I still think i

I am sorry, too, OJ, if even a scientific journal can't convince you. You are entitled to your opinion.

I think that car manufacturers do not want to put this devices on their new car models is it is too simple. Baka nahihiya lang sila dahil nabasa nila sa wikileaks na these devices do not work kaya panindigan na nila.

Parang si trump, who was impossible to win, but when he did; he is not potus. Baka ganuon lang. A case of ego, emo.

I read the paper and I have to wonder, what kind of a journal would accept such a manuscript? Was this even peer-reviewed? They did not explain in detail how this works (equations?, diagrams?). Then the grammatical errors.