Results 21 to 30 of 369
-
March 26th, 2008 07:52 PM #21
-
March 26th, 2008 07:53 PM #22
-
March 26th, 2008 08:37 PM #23
DYNO DYNO DYNO
Just got back from speedlab in Manila and we put a 2001 Starex 2.8l turbo diesel on the rollers that has the alcohol injection kit installed.
This vehicle is bone stock no modifications but a cold air intake. No boost controllers.
Guess what folks this is done with the factory intercooler completely by- passed. The top mount is completely worthless in this climate and the heavy traffic. So we just eliminated it
This is his set up, We completely ditched the factory intercooler, There is a DO1 nozzle pre turbo which you can see from the charts the resutls of the instant spooling it provides even with 100% water the TQ off the line is impressive and a DO2 nozzle at the intake to further cool things down. Now a M3 nozzle at the intake would work just as well on most vehicles but this one struggled to make boost so we did pre-turbo which makes the little turbo act like a big one.
We did pulls with 30/70 methanol/water and then switch over to 50/50 denatured because the meth was already mixed at 30% gains probably would have been even greater with the methanol.
Note the mixture was 30/70 methanol/water if it is not stated on the dyno sheet. The other mix we use was 62P bottle of Ethly alcohol from the drug store 500ml and 500ml water for the 50/50 mix. The gains were huge
System activates at around 1400rpm on this 2001 Starex
BASE LINE VS 100% WATER
Note 30lbs or around 40nm tq that you have at activation of the system even with 100% water vs the stock. This is the pre-turbo injection benifit. Little turbo acting like a bigger more efficient turbo.
Here is a comparison of different activation points with 30/70 methanol water.
-
March 26th, 2008 08:38 PM #24
TQ numbers
Notice the 50lbs or 67nm improvement at 1500rpms and 38lbs or 51nm at 2500rpms.
-
March 26th, 2008 08:40 PM #25
This is were we change it up to 50/50 mix, The methanol was already pre-mixed so we had to go with ethyl alcohol which I bought for 62P in a 500ml bottle. Gains will be higher with methanol because it has a higher octane number and better cooling.
Once again 50lbs more TQ AT 1500rpm the turbo spools up instantly when the system starts to inject. The effect is instant torque at low RPM's.
Stock TQ was only 163lbs or 221nm we took it to 201.2ft or 272.8nm with less than 70 Pesos worth of solution.
So does everything work exactly as advertised well you be your own judge
The emissions shop we went to did not have the detailed print out but this is what we got. The scanned copies will be posted later he needs to black out his personal info.
Stock no injection on
Opacimeter test result 2.29
Alcohol injection on
Opacimeter test results 0.52
Does it reduce emissions you bet it does. Plus doing the dyno we pretty much blew every bit of carbon out of that motor. There is no longer any black smoke from the Starex under load.
So now that you know you have hard proof of the performance gains and how much better it is for your vehicle and the major reduction in emissions hopefully more people will try it. It's like getting a new engine not to mention the fuel you save. The kits pay for themselves in every way.
Speedlab is now a official dealer and will have kits in stock in a few weeks.
-
March 27th, 2008 10:05 AM #26
Hmmm... this is interesting. Just waiting for a guinea pig and dyno sheets for a NA gas engined vehicle.
:cool01:
__________________
bigbigcar.com Review: Ford Everest XLS 2.5 TDCi 4x2
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 7
March 27th, 2008 02:14 PM #27the dyno test results proved the worthy inclusion of alcohol injection system in your engine bay. Here are the results of the emission test with and without alcohol injection:
-
March 27th, 2008 05:41 PM #28
I'm sold! The emissions benefits alone seem worth it.
I just need to figure out when I'll get the budget to do this on our Crosswind...
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 351
March 27th, 2008 09:11 PM #29did you say 2.8L tci starex? the starexes here are 2.5L turbo or tci and a 2.6L non-turbo. anyway, was there a comparison on the dyno between the original intercooled turbo and the alcohol injected one without intercooler? how much difference in power and torque noted? just want to know if if there's an increase in power with the alcohol injected one from the tci engine of the starex. how much would your product probably cost at speedlab?
-
March 27th, 2008 11:40 PM #30
Thats a type o on engine size
We did not bother with testing the vehicle with the intercooler because it defeats alot of the pre-turbo injection because it heats the air right back up. but the dyno had a file that had typical starex saved on it and it was actually a little bit lower than what we got without the intercooler. The power gain would be close if you did the injection right after the intercooler.
You would loose a small amount of HP due to the turbo having to work harder and the pressure loss you get through the intercooler. Running 50/50 methanol your numbers are going to be close to the same. The hp difference is probably less than 5%. Intercoolers are easily bypassed with a 45 degree connector.
Your turbo will still spool faster as soon as the alcohol comes on because of the intake temp drop, You just get a little bit more of a bump from the pre-turbo.
Kits will probably run at about 10,000P we sell them for $220USD in the states.
Heres how the intercooler was bypassed, Even when not in use it is still burning hot.
Here's the starex on the rollers.
Note the engine temp even after 6 pulls on the dyno.
Choice I would have made as well.:nod:
2024 Innova Zenix 2.0 V CVT (non-HEV) vs Innova...