Iglesia ni Cristo Refused Shelter

[Mile2]

John 20:28: "And Thomas answered and said unto him, My LORD and my God."

Nagsisinungaling pala si Thomas ng sabihin nyang my God si Jesus?

The Greek Text

Thomas' words to Jesus in Greek literally read, "the Lord of me and the God of me." In Greek this is how one would refer to two persons. If one wanted to refer to one person he would say, "the Lord and God of me." This is confirmed by the first and Sixth Granville Sharp rules. However, Trinitarians make a convenient exception to the sixth rule for this particular verse.

There are actually TWO important things to see here. First, there is the fact that both nouns, (1) Lord, and (2) God, are each qualified by the definition article ('the'). Second, both nouns, (1) Lord, and (2) God, are qualified by the words "of me." This is also telling. Thomas could have said, "the Lord and the God of me."

[xagent_orangex]

Kailangan pa ba kulitin?!

ako din follow-up question:

saang book sa Bible binanggit yang "sugo" ninyo na si Felix Manalo?

[ClaNker]

ako din follow-up question:

saang book sa Bible binanggit yang "sugo" ninyo na si Felix Manalo?

Implied na yan para sa kanila.

[Retz]

^

kung implied si manalo ay sugo dapat tanggapin din ni sir mile2x. ung mga ni implied ko.

[xagent_orangex]

self-proclaimed prophet + good networking and money handling = Iglesia ni Cristo

[Mile2]

"through one man's trespass, judgment came to all men, for by one man's disobedience all were made sinners."

God contradicts himself, tao si Cristo eh.

Hirit lang ng hirit.

In Romans 3:25, this is written:

God offered him, so that by his sacrificial death he should become the means by which people sins are forgiven through their faith in him. God did this in order to demonstrate that he is righteous

Christ was sanctified and made without sin so that those who will be with Christ's body would would be forgiven from sins.

[Mile2]

^

kung implied si manalo ay sugo dapat tanggapin din ni sir mile2x. ung mga ni implied ko.

simpleng aral tungkol sa tunay na Dios di nyo matanggap, yung mangangaral pa kaya.

[ClaNker]

In Romans 3:25, this is written:

God offered him, so that by his sacrificial death he should become the means by which people sins are forgiven through their faith in him. God did this in order to demonstrate that he is righteous

Christ was sanctified and made without sin so that those who will be with Christ's body would would be forgiven from sins.

Christ was sanctified and made without sin because Christ is God's?

[ClaNker]

simpleng aral tungkol sa tunay na Dios di nyo matanggap, yung mangangaral pa kaya.

:hysterical:

[Retz]

Another illustration......

Man is compose of
1. Body
2. Soul
3. Spirit

3 Men ba? hindi!

[Mile2]

Christ was sanctified and made without sin because Christ is God's?

False

[Mile2]

Another illustration......

Man is compose of
1. Body
2. Soul
3. Spirit

3 Men ba? hindi!

3 in 1 Coffee

1.. Sugar
2. Creamer
3. Coffee

Busog lusog ba?

[170kphlang]

"Very Special Man" yan ang nabasa mo sa balat ng lumpia.

parang title ng next john lloyd - bea alonzo film to a :D

Sent from my Cherry w500 using Tsikot Car Forums mobile app

[Retz]

^

sugarfree sa akin. :hit:

[Retz]

Philippians 2:6: "Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage."

mas malinaw pa sa sikat ng araw yan.

[Dark Lord]

In my earlier posts I mentioned about the council of nicaea. This is the point in time mile2 is referring to that according to his scriptures or doctrines gave divinity to Jesus Christ. So Jesus isn't God to INC. But INC's religion is solely based on the bible and probably the pasugo too. The bible of today is a product of nicea council and the following councils. Basing on analogy, if INC denies and do not want to recognize the nicea council, then why usethe bible in the first place? Not unless, mr manalo was present in thecouncils, how was he able to interpret the bible differently? How come it took him a long time and up to year 1914 to establish the iglesiah?

"through one man's trespass, judgment came to all men, for by one man's disobedience all were made sinners."

God contradicts himself, tao si Cristo eh.

Hirit lang ng hirit.

[[archie]]

All inc is doing is to twist the words of the bible. Yung nahuli si mile2 with a series of questions, he tried to divert with other passages. Pero when I stuck with the same point, wala... Iwas na lang para hindi mapahiya.

[ClaNker]

False

Sabi ko na ngaba eh. Di totoo to "You are my son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased" ang totoo eh "Very special man"

[Mile2]

Sabi ko na ngaba eh. Di totoo to "You are my son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased" ang totoo eh "Very special man"

Ang false dyan is yor claim that Christ is God

[Mile2]

In my earlier posts I mentioned about the council of nicaea. This is the point in time mile2 is referring to that according to his scriptures or doctrines gave divinity to Jesus Christ. So Jesus isn't God to INC. But INC's religion is solely based on the bible and probably the pasugo too. The bible of today is a product of nicea council and the following councils. Basing on analogy, if INC denies and do not want to recognize the nicea council, then why usethe bible in the first place? Not unless, mr manalo was present in thecouncils, how was he able to interpret the bible differently? How come it took him a long time and up to year 1914 to establish the iglesiah?

Nicean Council is about inserting the belief of 3 person God. Earlier than 325 AD The Father alone was God.