Iglesia ni Cristo Refused Shelter

[Mile2]

I dunno how it is for all but for me it's basically to live the "good news" (the morals and teachings that one may learn), in your day-to-day life and for others.



I've heard this before. Is this still true? If so, it's quite an irony that both SM and Landmark make it a point to have chapels in their malls and hold regular mass daily. In Landmark Makati at least, active din yung employees sa choir and sa pag serve from what i've observed.

BTT na nga tayo dito! So what's the real deal? Pinapasok ba talaga or hindi?

Watch the New Zealand news, and you'll found out that even the night before majority of the people around seek refuge inside the church regardless of religious affiliations

Conditions 'hellish' for Philippines survivors
By Michael Morrah
Reporter
Conditions 'hellish' for Philippines survivors - Story - World - 3 News

[Dark Lord]

aynaku. kala ko ba bible lang ang INC? why mention another book by Didache? i know the reason: it fits INC's purpose to elevate Sugo Felix Manalo to a higher pedestal.

ano nga ba apostolic order ng INC? from which apostle?

Just look back before the council of Nicea. Look back at the 1st century.

Didache The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles (60 - 120 A.D.) In this book, "Almighty God" is recognized to be simply the Father and the "Lord" is Jesus His servant-son (cf. Acts 2:36). Describing Jesus as God's servant-son is very typical of the Synoptic Gospels and Acts.

[ClaNker]

Watch the New Zealand news, and you'll found out that even the night before majority of the people around seek refuge inside the church regardless of religious affiliations

Conditions 'hellish' for Philippines survivors
By Michael Morrah
Reporter
Conditions 'hellish' for Philippines survivors - Story - World - 3 News

Anong majority? 11 families lang ang pinapasok dyan. Ilang families ang non-member?

[ClaNker]

aynaku. kala ko ba bible lang ang INC? why mention another book by Didache? i know the reason: it fits INC's purpose to elevate Sugo Felix Manalo to a higher pedestal.

ano nga ba apostolic order ng INC? from which apostle?

Wag mo ng banatan sa Bible. Common sense na lang. Kung si Cristo ay tao sino ang biological father nya? Bastardo pala si Cristo, anak sa pag kaka sala.

Sabi nga ng uncle ni misis na die hard INC eh malandi daw yang si Mary, anak nya si Cristo sa pagka dalaga eh.

[Gumusut_Amige]

back at you all inc. sinabi lang ni manalo na siya ang from the far east at huling sugo "talon narin kayo sa conclusion" na siya na nga

Sent from my Cherry w500 using Tsikot Car Forums mobile app

meron akong kainuman na dalawang kapatid before at dito napunta ang usapan... tanong ko sa kanila, paano kayo nakakasiguro na si manalo nga ang tinutukoy na sugo sa far east? sa dami ng nagsusulpotang "religion" ngayon pwede ba kayong nagkamali sa inyong akala? tapos ang debatehan

[shadow]

Akala ko bawal uminom mga INC members, eh bakit puro lassengo yata....


Sent from my iPad using Tsikot Car Forums

[ClaNker]

Akala ko bawal uminom mga INC members, eh bakit puro lassengo yata....


Sent from my iPad using Tsikot Car Forums

Yung uncle nga ni misis eh bukod sa lasengo na babaero pa.

[testament11]

^
Sila rin pala mismo ang bumabali sa doktrina nila. Buti pa RC, walang mga ganyan. Bahala ka at your own will at huhusgahan ka nalang sa langit based sa mga ginagawa mo dito sa mundo

[Dark Lord]

again, the question to INC is: why use the bible and read its entirety and boast being able to memorize it cover-to-cover if the council of nicea, that produced and molded the bible, is dubious and farce due to the insertion of Trinity? Come on. Maybe, Manalo was there in the councils and he just got enlightened in 1914 and establish the INC.

Just look back before the council of Nicea. Look back at the 1st century.

Didache The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles (60 - 120 A.D.) In this book, "Almighty God" is recognized to be simply the Father and the "Lord" is Jesus His servant-son (cf. Acts 2:36). Describing Jesus as God's servant-son is very typical of the Synoptic Gospels and Acts.

[chua_riwap]

Akala ko bawal uminom mga INC members, eh bakit puro lassengo yata....


Sent from my iPad using Tsikot Car Forums

di totoo yan sir.
yung officemate ko, babaero rin.

bukod sa misis nya, may misis din sa saudi.

maayos sa tithes.....

[ClaNker]

di totoo yan sir.
yung officemate ko, babaero rin.

bukod sa misis nya, may misis din sa saudi.

maayos sa tithes.....

Yan ang pinaka importante.

[chua_riwap]

at eto pa.

mga anak nya (elem. & hs), nag-aaral sa notre dame caloocan.
pero pinayagan sila ng school (since INC sila), na huwag um-attend sa religion subjects nila.

pwede pala yun?

[ClaNker]

at eto pa.

mga anak nya (elem. & hs), nag-aaral sa notre dame caloocan.
pero pinayagan sila ng school (since INC sila), na huwag um-attend sa religion subjects nila.

pwede pala yun?

Pwede yan except pag dominican sisters controlled strict ang mga yun.

[Mile2]

again, the question to INC is: why use the bible and read its entirety and boast being able to memorize it cover-to-cover if the council of nicea, that produced and molded the bible, is dubious and farce due to the insertion of Trinity? Come on. Maybe, Manalo was there in the councils and he just got enlightened in 1914 and establish the INC.

In the Bible, "God" is simply Jesus' Father. Jesus is God's Son, that is, the Son of the Father. Are we really supposed to assume that God is something more than Jesus' Father? The one and only God which Jesus himself worshiped and served was one person - his Father alone. Jesus said, "My Father and your Father, my God and your God." Quite plainly, Jesus expects our God to be the same God as his God. Who then is Jesus' God? Are we really expected to believe he served a three person God? And if the Father is the one and only God Jesus served, why then do Trinitarians advocate serving a different three person God? And a God that is also never once described in the entire Bible?

The word "God" is normally used in the Bible to refer to Jesus' Father. Is that not plain enough? Jesus also refers to his Father as "the only God" and "the only true God." Paul contrasted many gods to "one God, the Father." He also said there is "one God and Father of all." Is it not clear enough? Is it not plain who Jesus and his apostles worshiped as God? Paul said, "there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Jesus." A mediator by definition is neither party in question. And here in this verse, the mediator, Jesus, is neither "the one God" nor the group of "men" for whom he mediates. Is it not clear enough?

Who was the God of the Jews? A three person being? No. Their God was one person, Jesus' Father. And Jesus was the Son of their God. The Bible says the God of Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob glorified his son Jesus. That certainly is not a reference to a three person God.

[chua_riwap]

Pwede yan except pag dominican sisters controlled strict ang mga yun.

ah ok.
sabagay, may neighbor nga kami na muslim.
nag-aaral naman mga anak nila sa PCU.......hah-ha!

[[archie]]

For reasons unknown, previous thread was deleted. But the fact remains, you said these things:

Fact: you quoted the bible "everyone MUST give"

Fact: you deny na kung wala ka pera, hindi pwede sumali.

Fact: Those two are contradicting.

Who is right?

A. You

B. Bible

I think your common sense should be able to grasp on how to answer.

Ehem... Kahapon pa yung tanong.

[testament11]

In the Bible, "God" is simply Jesus' Father. Jesus is God's Son, that is, the Son of the Father. Are we really supposed to assume that God is something more than Jesus' Father? The one and only God which Jesus himself worshiped and served was one person - his Father alone. Jesus said, "My Father and your Father, my God and your God." Quite plainly, Jesus expects our God to be the same God as his God. Who then is Jesus' God? Are we really expected to believe he served a three person God? And if the Father is the one and only God Jesus served, why then do Trinitarians advocate serving a different three person God? And a God that is also never once described in the entire Bible?

The word "God" is normally used in the Bible to refer to Jesus' Father. Is that not plain enough? Jesus also refers to his Father as "the only God" and "the only true God." Paul contrasted many gods to "one God, the Father." He also said there is "one God and Father of all." Is it not clear enough? Is it not plain who Jesus and his apostles worshiped as God? Paul said, "there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Jesus." A mediator by definition is neither party in question. And here in this verse, the mediator, Jesus, is neither "the one God" nor the group of "men" for whom he mediates. Is it not clear enough?

Who was the God of the Jews? A three person being? No. Their God was one person, Jesus' Father. And Jesus was the Son of their God. The Bible says the God of Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob glorified his son Jesus. That certainly is not a reference to a three person God.

Ok, ikaw na mismo nagsabi niyan ah. God is Jesus' Father, who we all worship. So sa sinasabi mo, Jesus is not a mere man. Yan ang sinasabi mo di ba? Hindi tao si Jesus Christ. If He is the son of God, then He is God also, and not a mere man. Di mo sinasabi dito na "very special person" lang siya.

Ngayon ang tanong, sino si Felix Manalo sa buhay ng Diyos at ni Jesus Christ? Paano naging sugo ng Diyos at katuparan ng prophecy si Felix Manalo? Ito ang mabigat na tanong, tao ba si Felix Manalo o God?

Yan ang hindi mo masagot. Wala sa mga litanya ng bible ang Felix Manalo. Hanapin mo kung saang sitas ang Felix Manalo, sige, hinahamon ka namin.

Pag nakita mo, pasara mo na itong thread na ito at pagtawanan mo kami. Pero paano pag di mo yan makita sa bible? Pwede ba namin hilingin sa iyo na itanong mo yan sa mga ministro ninyo at patunayan nilang si Manalo ang sinasabing sugo at katuparan ng prophecy ng Diyos?

[radz15]

Akala ko bawal uminom mga INC members, eh bakit puro lassengo yata....


Sent from my iPad using Tsikot Car Forums

Nakoo. Lahat ng kilala kong INC manginginom. May nakainuman pa nga akong jakono eh. Sabi pa sakin. Kaya lang naman pinagbabawal uminom ang INC para makaiwas sa gulo pag nalalasing. So pwede pa lang mag inom ang INC ang long as payapa at walang gulo sa inuman? :D

Sent from my LG-P920 using Tapatalk 2

[ozcity]

^ pag ganyan mga tanong ko sa inc na kaibigan ko..nawawala na sa katwiran...umuusok sa galit..heheheh

Sent from Toyota Chatswood NSW...GT-I9505

[radz15]

Pansin ko lang sa mga member ng INC namimili lang sila ng rules na susundin. Gaya ng pag pagkain ng dugo. Sobrang iwas mga INC sa pagkain ng dinuguan, betamax etc. Pero pag laklak ng alak game na game sila.. :confused:

Sent from my LG-P920 using Tapatalk 2