Hmmm... I think that implied demarcation can work with a lot of things, and for a lot of different cultures, ours included, somehow. But i think it's just too dangerous for implied demarcation to be applied when it comes to driving. There are just too many things to pay attention to when driving, with cellphones still excluded at that, for one to still have to worry about implied demarcation. It's bad enough that we do not have standard lane sizes, or lanes that smoothly merge into other lanes down the road. It's more chaotic that a lot of motorists, private and public, choose to disregard any semblance of lanes we have here and straddle two.

Counterflowing should be outlawed, unless it is under strict supervision of traffic enforcerS. One enforcer is not enough to control big intersections, let alone if he plans to allow counterflowing for a certain interval.

About BF's U-turns, I don't think all of them are bad. I just think that a lot of them should not have been implemented or should have been better implemented. Having huge U-turn slots under flyovers at some Edsa intersections still allow motorists going straight to proceed without having to make drastic evasive manuevers. However, some slots, like Quezon Ave, should not have been done in the first place because of choke points in the vicinity due to PUVs loading/unloading indiscriminately in the middle of the street or motorists swerving all over the place, or due to a corner in the vicinity being quite tight.

The Pink fences, IMO, are really bothersome. They make tight roads even tighter. And they can be nudged by buses so that they are misaligned and take up even more private room. If BF really wanted the fences in place, he should've done what his fellow small but terrible opponent did, and cement the fences to the ground.