Results 741 to 750 of 4200
-
October 30th, 2006 09:40 AM #741
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 106
October 30th, 2006 04:59 PM #742INQ7.net, GMA7
Last updated 01:14pm (Mla time) 10/30/2006
PRICES of Liquefied Petroleum Gas will be rolled back by 0.50 per kilo effective midnight Tuesday, according to a “Flash Report” on GMA Network, quoting a group of LPG dealers.
The report said the decision by the LPG Marketers Association to reduce prices was the fourth for this month.
The continuing rollback in LPG prices was due to the lowering of the cost of crude in the world market, the report said.
-
October 30th, 2006 05:22 PM #743
-
Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 2
October 30th, 2006 06:35 PM #744hey pips (especially ghosthunter)
i'm doing a presentation on thursday in vietnam re: air quality management policies in Asia and I would like to highlight that despite no actual policy or legal framework for compulsary conversion to LPG, the Philippines has seen lately a substantial fleet converting to LPG.
from the viewpoint of air pollution, LPG is better than gasoline. less emissions..
i need to be hooked to people who can provide me numbers (at least an approximate number) of how many taxis have converted.. how many private vehicle? in say the past few months.
what are issues that arise due to this lack of policy?
- i'm thinking safety issues - no framework or guidelines that govern companies doing the conversions.
- no incentives (aside from savings) for converting to LPG. in some countries, car owners can be provided subsidies or loans to convert.
- currently LPG prices in retail stations are considerably cheap because tax (I think) for LPG is still lower because it is considered as more a residential sector use than commercial auto use. there needs to be assurance from government that at least in the next few years, they will still keep LPG tax structure as it is now.
- from my viewpoint, the government should look into drafting a policy on auto LPG use to safeguard the interest of the public.
if you have thoughts on this please email me or YM me mayajero*yahoo.com
thanks.
Maya
-
October 30th, 2006 09:35 PM #745
It is substantial but only in metro manila and metro cebu. The problem is getting more auto-LPG refilling stations setup.
from the viewpoint of air pollution, LPG is better than gasoline. less emissions..
i need to be hooked to people who can provide me numbers (at least an approximate number) of how many taxis have converted.. how many private vehicle? in say the past few months.
what are issues that arise due to this lack of policy?
[*]i'm thinking safety issues - no framework or guidelines that govern companies doing the conversions.
[*]no incentives (aside from savings) for converting to LPG. in some countries, car owners can be provided subsidies or loans to convert.
[*]currently LPG prices in retail stations are considerably cheap because tax (I think) for LPG is still lower because it is considered as more a residential sector use than commercial auto use. there needs to be assurance from government that at least in the next few years, they will still keep LPG tax structure as it is now.
[*]from my viewpoint, the government should look into drafting a policy on auto LPG use to safeguard the interest of the public.
-
Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 4
-
Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 2
October 31st, 2006 03:42 PM #747hi ghosthunter.
thanks for the quick reply. I have done some calling also last night after I posted my message.
here's what i found out:
1. the Bureau of Product Standards has already prepared a standard to regulate the quality of LPG as autofuel.
2. This however still does not cover the quality of the conversion kits
3. last year there were only about 108 converted taxis as of Sept 2005 compared to an estimated 5,000 as of July 2006 (SMS of Len B to a friend)
4. LTFRB has plans to provide an incentive of longer terms for their franchise if they convert to LPG.
now, in response to your replies.
1. you are correct. condition of a vehicle still plays a lot of role when it comes to emissions. (which is why we have been pushing for an MVIS in DOTC and an Inspection and Maintenance (I and M) here).. anyway, but given two vehicles or engines of same type and condition, LPG produces lower emissions of air pollutants (particulates, CO and HC).. except for NOx I think.
2. in all other points, i am in full agreement.
It struck me that maybe it would be good to compare the "achievements" in the LPG sector vs CNG. The CNG sector had a lot of investments and planning etc involved but nothing much has happened until now. The plans remained plans.
you have pictures of LPG-converted cars in the country? I would appreciate receiving them. With your permission, I'd like to use them in my presentation. Thanks.
May
-
Tsikot Member Rank 4
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 2,605
October 31st, 2006 05:07 PM #748Just spoke with the Green Autogas, they said that the traditional type of lpg kit which uses the venturi principle has risk of backfire. They said they do not recommend using this type of system. According to them, there is about 5% chance of getting a backfire and it may damage the airfilter housing. Is this true? LPG users, feedback please.
They were recommending the sequential type which according to them has zero risk of backfire and no power loss. Catch is it will take 3 days to install and they will drill holes in the manifold for the injectors. They further said that if I decide to remove the kit in the future, the holes can be welded or repaired by a machine shop.
If I convert, it will take about a year to recover the cost of the traditional kit. For the sequential type, about 2.5 years. Is it worth to convert? And if so which is the better deal?
-
October 31st, 2006 07:23 PM #749
In a typical modern engine, the chance of a backfire is pretty remote UNLESS you are playing with the adjustments for the engine's ignition timing or valve cams.
Major advantages of a sequential type LPG kit are:
-no loss of engine power (due to the venturi pipe)
-less sensitive to air filter condition
-more efficient than venturi type
Disadvantage:
-costs at least twice more than venturi type
-drills holes into the engine intake manifold (for the injectors)
IMHO, the decision to get either type depends on your reasons why you are getting a LPG kit in the first place. You want to save money. Next thing to consider is how long do you plan to keep the car. If you plan to keep the car for the next four years or more, you could get the sequential. If the car is rather getting old, then the traditional venturi type LPG kit would be the realistic choice.
-
October 31st, 2006 07:33 PM #750
one major stumbling block in CNG is it's limited market. Only busses will be able to use CNG as fuel. Another problem is where can you refuel on CNG? I think there is only ONE CNG refuelling station.
you have pictures of LPG-converted cars in the country? I would appreciate receiving them. With your permission, I'd like to use them in my presentation.
May
You could also visit an auto-LPG refilling station and take pictures of cars getting their LPG tanks refilled.
If you need a better picture of my car, I could take a few pictures and upload it for you.
And also edit option is not allowed anymore :grin:
Problems with viewing Tsikot on non-Chromium...