New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 64
  1. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #31
    Quote Originally Posted by StockEngine View Post
    you dont even need to mash the 2.2 according to reviews..

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app

    Thanks for the input sir StockEngine.

    But maybe it is better if owners of the 2.2L can comment or share on this, performance and fuel consumption.

    Anyway, I will only have a few uphill travel, say once every 2-3 months.

  2. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #32
    Quote Originally Posted by minicarph View Post
    3.2l tingen ko pareho lang konsumo sa 2.2L. pero pag lagi akyatan like Tanay or Baguo or Tagayatay mas matipid ang 3.2 coz stressed ang 2.2. but hey do you do that daily?

    noted sir minicarph.

    how about a luxury sedan like accord or mazda 6? would you prefer it over a pickup?

    this will be my third car and i will drive it.

  3. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10,820
    #33
    gusto mo ng malakas na makina pero gusto mo din matipid. bili ka ng 3.2 ranger at saka BISEKLETA. pag need mo power gamit mo ranger. pag tipid mode e di mag exercise ka muna sakay ng bisekleta.

    o pwede din bili ka ng 2.2 saka isang KALABAW. pag city lang e di ranger gamit mo. pag sa farm at need mo ng 4x4 na di uurong sa putikan e di sakyan mo si damulag.

    either you buy the 2.2 and regret later that you find you need more power or you buy the 3.2 and pay the cost of higher fuel consumption. you can't have both.

    makulit ka.

  4. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #34
    Quote Originally Posted by yebo View Post
    gusto mo ng malakas na makina pero gusto mo din matipid. bili ka ng 3.2 ranger at saka BISEKLETA. pag need mo power gamit mo ranger. pag tipid mode e di mag exercise ka muna sakay ng bisekleta.

    o pwede din bili ka ng 2.2 saka isang KALABAW. pag city lang e di ranger gamit mo. pag sa farm at need mo ng 4x4 na di uurong sa putikan e di sakyan mo si damulag.

    either you buy the 2.2 and regret later that you find you need more power or you buy the 3.2 and pay the cost of higher fuel consumption. you can't have both.

    makulit ka.
    okay. nagtatanong lang po kasi kayo ang mga "expert"... salamat na rin sa mga comment mo... pwede ka naman hindi mag comment kung nakukulitan ka kesa naman bastusan

  5. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10,820
    #35
    sinagot ka na kasi pero inuulit mo lang ulit yung tanong mo. gusto mo yata yung isasagot sa iyo yung gusto mo na sagot. e hindi nga e. pag 2.2 matipid pero baka kapusin ka sa offroad lalo na mabigat ang 4x4 ng ranger. pag 3.2 malakas pero magastos sa diesel. hindi magbabago yang sagot na yan kahit paulit-ulit mo pang tanungin.

    o gusto mo magsinungaling kami para makontento ka sa sagot?

  6. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #36
    Quote Originally Posted by yebo View Post
    sinagot ka na kasi pero inuulit mo lang ulit yung tanong mo. gusto mo yata yung isasagot sa iyo yung gusto mo na sagot. e hindi nga e. pag 2.2 matipid pero baka kapusin ka sa offroad lalo na mabigat ang 4x4 ng ranger. pag 3.2 malakas pero magastos sa diesel. hindi magbabago yang sagot na yan kahit paulit-ulit mo pang tanungin.

    o gusto mo magsinungaling kami para makontento ka sa sagot?

    ok naintindihan ko na. salamat. 3.2 na kukunin ko.

  7. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    8,492
    #37
    Quote Originally Posted by the_arrow View Post
    sir minicarph, is 10-11 km/liter for 3.2L fuel consumption? how about for the 2.2L?
    have no idea about the 2.2 other than problematic daw eto mga 2.2 with the turbo. i dont if its 2.2 na pre-facelift version ang nagkakaproblema, join the FB Ford Rangers Members group, dun ka marami matanungan aout the ranger. i have several photos of my Ranger doon

  8. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    8,492
    #38
    Quote Originally Posted by the_arrow View Post
    noted sir minicarph.

    how about a luxury sedan like accord or mazda 6? would you prefer it over a pickup?

    this will be my third car and i will drive it.
    for. me, big sedans and vans. never na ako bible kahit kailan mainly becuase it so hard to sell pag ayaw mo na

  9. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    8,492
    #39
    Quote Originally Posted by yebo View Post
    sinagot ka na kasi pero inuulit mo lang ulit yung tanong mo. gusto mo yata yung isasagot sa iyo yung gusto mo na sagot. e hindi nga e. pag 2.2 matipid pero baka kapusin ka sa offroad lalo na mabigat ang 4x4 ng ranger. pag 3.2 malakas pero magastos sa diesel. hindi magbabago yang sagot na yan kahit paulit-ulit mo pang tanungin.

    o gusto mo magsinungaling kami para makontento ka sa sagot?
    pagpasensyahan mo na si fafa kasi direct to the point sya talaga pero deep inside he truly cares

  10. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #40
    Quote Originally Posted by the_arrow View Post
    noted sir minicarph.

    how about a luxury sedan like accord or mazda 6? would you prefer it over a pickup?

    this will be my third car and i will drive it.
    If you're going to buy a midsize car, make sure to keep it. The resale value sucks if you sell it a few years down the road.

    If you ask me, I'd pick a midsize car over a PPV or CUV or pickup. An Accord or Mazda6 is a much better drive than any of those vehicles, not to mention much more comfortable inside. I would have opted for a Mazda6 last year but the wife wanted a family SUV. So we choose the next best thing - a CUV, comfortable enough for 5 people but with the extra luggage space and higher ground clearance.
    Last edited by Egan101; July 16th, 2017 at 05:03 PM.

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4x4 AT vs 3.2L 4x4 AT