New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 64
  1. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10,820
    #11
    Quote Originally Posted by the_arrow View Post
    diba pareho lang makina ng starex at Santa Fe?
    no. 2.2 sta fe and 2.5 starex. e mas malaki naman kaha ng starex kesa sa fort mo, mas malakas ang wind drag.

  2. Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    4,448
    #12
    Quote Originally Posted by yebo View Post
    no. 2.2 sta fe and 2.5 starex. e mas malaki naman kaha ng starex kesa sa fort mo, mas malakas ang wind drag.
    Tsaka ang bigat pa ng starex

    Sent from my SM-A9000 using Tapatalk

  3. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #13
    Quote Originally Posted by dct View Post
    Tsaka ang bigat pa ng starex

    Sent from my SM-A9000 using Tapatalk
    sir dct ano po mas tipid 2.2 or 3.2?

  4. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,626
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by the_arrow View Post
    sir dct ano po mas tipid 2.2 or 3.2?
    brad..

    an idling(or crawling in traffic)2.2 4cyl engine will consume less fuel than a 3.2l 5cyl engine...

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app

  5. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #15
    Quote Originally Posted by StockEngine View Post
    brad..

    an idling(or crawling in traffic)2.2 4cyl engine will consume less fuel than a 3.2l 5cyl engine...

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app

    salamat sir! e kung walang traffic? mas tipid ang 3.2l? probinsya kasi dito sa amin... d masyado traffic at puro highway driving

  6. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,626
    #16
    the 2.2 will still consume less fuel.

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app

  7. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #17
    Quote Originally Posted by StockEngine View Post
    the 2.2 will still consume less fuel.

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app

    salamat sir StockEngine!

  8. Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    153
    #18
    Quote Originally Posted by the_arrow View Post
    thank you sir yebo sa inputs.

    actually, wala naman mud na malalim and river na dadaanan... gusto ko lang sana 4x4 para in times na need ko, 4x4 na pickup ko hehehe
    Eh di 3.2 na kunin mo para "in times na need mo" 3.2 na pickup mo. Hehehe

  9. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Wishing View Post
    Eh di 3.2 na kunin mo para "in times na need mo" 3.2 na pickup mo. Hehehe
    salamat po sir Wishing sa comment.. ano po masabi nyo na mas tipid daw ang 2.2L kesa 3.2L? meron rin nagsabi 3.2L mas tipid sa fuel consumption

  10. Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    1,879
    #20
    Quote Originally Posted by the_arrow View Post
    salamat po sir Wishing sa comment.. ano po masabi nyo na mas tipid daw ang 2.2L kesa 3.2L? meron rin nagsabi 3.2L mas tipid sa fuel consumption
    Fuel consumption will still depend on several factors.
    Your driving Style, Your car pick up load use, road conditions.

    If you are a lead footed driver or prefer a faster paced travel time you may be suited for a 3.2L more than a 2.2L.
    The Same with Load factor. If your pick-up carries a lot of heavy items frequently then a 3.2L might be more economical.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4x4 AT vs 3.2L 4x4 AT