
Originally Posted by
Arshxd
Usually less yung powerloss sa MT vs conventional AT because MT transmissions are directly connected to the drive wheels while conventional AT transmissions use a torque converter. The torque converter itself can be thought of as joint between the engine and an AT transmission. Imagine the connection between engine and transmission as 2 shafts, in between these shafts is a thick fluid. When the shaft from the engine spins, the fluid also starts to spin, this then makes the shaft going to the transmission also spin.
While this allows an AT to make smooth starts without need for a clutch, spinning the fluid in the torque converter wastes engine power when compared to the direct connection of a MT. This wasted power is power that could have gone into making the car accelerate faster, hence the advantage.
That's why some cars like Fords with "Power Shift" transmissions instead use a dual clutch transmission. Which in effect it is a MT transmission that is operated via computer so that it acts like a conventional AT. The downside of these however as it won't be as smooth as a conventional AT.
One final note is that all transmissions are not made equal. Each transmission can be made to give more acceleration or more top-speed, this greatly affects acceleration and fuel consumption. top-speed setup transmission usually give better fuel consumption than acceleration setup transmissions, because of this some AT transmissions are given topspeed oriented gearing compared to their MT versions to match their fuel consumption, in exchange for slower acceleration.
Hope that helps but correct me if im wrong.