
Originally Posted by
jut703
For those still caught up with rear drum brakes, try riding a bike. The front brakes are exponentially more effective than the rear (we just rarely use it because of the fear of endo).
And to those saying discs are better because they have better heat dissipation. I ask, when do you need repeated hard braking aside from a racetrack? If it's just one (or a few) instance(s) of full braking, the rear brakes won't heat up and lose effectiveness, even if they're drums.
You can say on a downhill (say, Kennon). Physics dictates that in such cases, it's still the front brakes that do almost all the braking. You should be more concerned about the strength and resistance to fade of your front brakes (not all discs are made the same).
But then again, it's so easy to generalize that discs > drums and drums are antiquated. Few bother to know why exactly discs are better, and how inconsequential this actually is in real world use.