Quote Originally Posted by artnesmith View Post
For more reference on Faraday's Law see this link:
http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Faradays_law.aspx

Most information on Michael Faraday's Law tend to revolve around his laws of induction for magnetism which can be confusing for those trying to understand the big picture. Basically, going by Faraday's Law, you just cannot get out more than you put in something. Many have claimed "overunity" or getting out more than they put in, but nothing yet documented. There are some electromagnetic coils being tested now for validity that tend to show overunity, but nothing verified at this time. According to Faraday you cannot use one BTU of gasoline to generate more than one BTU of production. There would always be a loss unless you are using geothermal, nuclear or gravity for example.

So Faraday's Law could apply to electric cars, for just one example, that even if they turn generators while driving, the generators will not produce as much power as is consumed by the electric motors meaning eventually the batteries will run down. In our case, the gasoline used to generator one watt is more than the energy value of the hydrogen we produce.

If you take our formula, you'll notice there are values already established to evaluate the amount of energy necessary to produce one watt. Then this is figured in to the value in BTUs of hydrogen we produce. If we break even, or unity, then we get 100% efficiency. Some people on the Internet show exaggerated figures on HHO production and amps. When you figure this up according to Faraday's Law you have more than 100% efficiency or overunity. If you have overunity, then this means you gain or run ahead the more you use or produce. If so, then why in the world would you ever need a gas tank? Clearly they are exaggerating, dishonest or just unable to measure volumes and amps properly.

Our formula 7744 X 100 X HHO produced in one minute divided by (Watts X 60 seconds) is taking the energy necessary to make the hydrogen (Watts X test period in seconds) and dividing that into the value of the HHO produced. So basically we are taking a standard measure of energy necessary to produce electricity compared to the energy value of the hydrogen produced in BTUs of energy. Faraday's Law can be applied to many other technologies including electric motors and hydrogen fuel cells that turn hydrogen into electricity. You just need to have the energy value of what you make compared to the energy value of what was consumed to make that volume.

The reason most formulas on the Internet take the BTU value of hydrogen by weight, then transfered to volume at sea level is because the volume of a gas at sea level will be less than the same weight of that gas at much higher altitude. I could take a cell making 1 liter per minute in Manila (sea level) and take it to Mexico City (more than 2 kilometers above sea level) and the same volume of hydrogen will occupy more space making it appear to be larger. So guys testing their HHO generators at high altitude may appear to be more efficient than the rest of us, but actually just making the same amount of gas in mass/weight even if it is more in volume.

This is why when you over run a HHO generator your mileage goes down. If run at lower amps, this depends on the engine size and whether diesel of gasoline fueled, you tend to be within the "flywheel effect" of that engine. This is the area where the engine's momentum carries it, to a point. If you pass this area mileage will drop as you must burn more fuel to push the extra amperage. More HHO does not equate to better mileage if amps run away beyond the engine's ability to carry those amps. I don't remember seeing this on the Internet, but it's a factor you will run into if you tinker around with different strengths of electrolyte, especially on small engines.
Sir, I think you mixed up the laws of Faraday. The one you just told here is that if you have changing magnetic flux, emf will be produced which cannot be related to what you are talking about.

However, there is also Faraday's law for electrolysis.
http://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genche...araday.php#law

How does your equation from page 14 derived from Faraday's law of electrolysis?