Is WWIII inevitable?

[Ry_Tower]

WW3 na pala talaga dito.hehe

Ako ok lang na mapalitan US as world leader. Afterall it has its shortcomings and flaws. Question is who is a better alternative. With emphasis on BETTER. Kasi if worst, abay lokohan naman yan any way you look at it.

Sent from my LG-H990 using Tapatalk

[dreamur]

Let uls hates the U.S. and the liberals. China is his bread and butter so the hatred is understandable.

Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk

[minicarph]

ako mas kinakabahan pa sa World War IV kaysa sa world war 3

[Egan101]

Current world leaders are too calculative enough not to engage in open global warfare as it is a sure way to destroy whatever they had built. Not to mention the potential repercussions of them being removed from power.

Conflicts within satellite states (Syria, Ukraine, Middle East, Central Africa, etc.) will continue to proliferate but not on a wider scale to have countries mobilize all their military might.

Who wants WW3 anyway? In case WW3 breaks out and countries started throwing nukes at each other, then Albert Einstein may be somewhat right after all.

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." - Albert Einstein

[111prez]

Talked to an active US Navy personnel (Filipino) at sabi nya kargado daw lahat ng barko ng US sa Pacific ngayon.

He did not elaborate further but we all got it

[uls]

the US will keep sending warships to SCS to provoke China

sooner or later there's gonna be an incident

[Egan101]

Talked to an active US Navy personnel (Filipino) at sabi nya kargado daw lahat ng barko ng US sa Pacific ngayon.

He did not elaborate further but we all got it

I don't think US Navy ships ever sail to international waters without packing some load. A USN Carrier Strike Group packs more air and naval firepower than most other countries can muster and the US has 10 active carrier strike groups (three for each major ocean). The usual carrier strike group consists of a carrier, its active air wing, one guided missile cruiser (AEGIS), 2 guided missile destroyers (AEGIS), a submarine squadron, plus its logistics and supply ships.

[kisshmet]

the US will keep sending warships to SCS to provoke China

sooner or later there's gonna be an incident

one will blink..guess who will be the first to blink?

a nation of lesser power

theres only one way to deal with a bully, that is to be a bigger bully

Sent from my ASUS Chromebook C202SA using Tapatalk

[Monseratto]

Hope the US won't mistake an airliner for a Chinese bomber and shoot it down , like what they did to Iran. THe US was protecting "Freedom of Navigation" at the Gulf of Hormuz that time...

[Egan101]

Hope the US won't mistake an airliner for a Chinese bomber and shoot it down , like what they did to Iran. THe US was protecting "Freedom of Navigation" at the Gulf of Hormuz that time...

Russia also had a few incidents of shooting down airliners flying outside the civilian air corridors. In the case of the USN guided missile cruiser Vincennes, it was shooting at an unidentified aircraft flying in a military corridor in a threat vector towards the cruiser.

For Korean Air 007, the pilot of the Russian fighter localised and identified the aircraft as an airliner but proceeded to shoot it down as it was inside Russian airspace. We need not count Malaysia Airlines MH17 which was shot down within the conflict area of Ukraine by a Russian-made surface-to-air missile.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk