New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 11 of 102 FirstFirst ... 7891011121314152161 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 220 of 3164

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    54,626
    #1
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by badkuk View Post
    This is a very strange time for oil.

    i can remember not so long ago, at the slightest hint of dissent in the ME, oil prices would spike. Yet now we have ISIS rampaging across Syria/Iraq, and oil is under US$40/barrel.

    Basically there's too much oil these days. Contributing factors are: China economic slowdown, US shale boom, OPEC not cutting oil production, new production from Iraw and Iran, smuggled oil from ISIS(as much as 75% discount daw, as long as you pay in cash)


    Funny to think that, before the start of the decade, there was talk about the world running out of oil, with oil reaching US$145/barrel.
    did the introduction of shale oil, somehow disrupt the usual monopolies' control over the market?
    i initially predicted only a short period of falling oil prices when shale oil was first introduced.. apparently i was mistaken.

  2. Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    9,720
    #2
    Quote Originally Posted by dr. d View Post
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



    did the introduction of shale oil, somehow disrupt the usual monopolies' control over the market?
    i initially predicted only a short period of falling oil prices when shale oil was first introduced.. apparently i was mistaken.
    Yan din expectation ko sir, there was even talk about the US becoming a net oil exporter...but apparently the Saudis/OPEC saw this coming, that's why they didn't curb oil production -- they intended to drive oil prices down to make shale operations unprofitable, buy them up for pennies, then jack prices up again once they've controlled it. Problem is, it's taking longer than expected, and Saudi Arabia now has to borrow money because of losses in selling oil. Strange times indeed.

    sorry OT na
    Last edited by badkuk; November 26th, 2015 at 06:18 AM.

  3. Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    201
    #3
    winter is coming

  4. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    8,492
    #4
    Quote Originally Posted by lichking616 View Post
    winter is coming


    imageuploadedbytsikot-forums1448430715.445676.jpg


    -------------------------

  5. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,994
    #5
    Just when you think it can't get any worse, McCain's so-called "moderate rebels" shoot down a search and rescue helicopter with US supplied Traversing Unit Guided Missile M83. serial: 208520.

    https://youtu.be/WHm2Owpo79Q
    Damn, son! Where'd you find this?

  6. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,994
    #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Altis6453 View Post
    Just s thought, weren't Russian bombers dropping bombs on Syrian rebels as well as ISIS? If so, that would explain why the pilot of the downed Russian plane was shot. It's no secret that Putin is backing up Assad since the West is backing up the rebels.

    Further, a lot of analysts point out this wasn't the first time Russia entered or tried to enter Turkey's airspace. It appears they've been doing so even before Russia decided to join the conflict in Syria.

    Just my two cents.
    the problem here is that the US backed rebels have sworn allegiance to IS

    here's something else to consider. the downed Su-24 was *ON* the border for 9 seconds though NATO alleged it was 30 seconds or so. The plane was shot from behind. In order for that plane to be shot on that location, the F-16 had to fire it from behind with a minimum range of 500 meters. Ergo, the Turkish F-16 had to enter the Syrian border as well to get that attack vector because according to the Turks, they were warning the Su-24 during the intercept.
    Last edited by safeorigin; November 25th, 2015 at 04:07 PM.

  7. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,994
    #7
    for a better understanding of how Turkey's border work, refer to this:
    Russia ?Violated? Turkish Airspace Because Turkey ?Moved? Its Border | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization

    you will understand bettwe what I meant that the Turkish F-16 had to enter the Syrian border as well. hehe

    http://21stcenturywire.com/wp-conten...ussian-jet.jpg

  8. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    3,872
    #8
    Quote Originally Posted by safeorigin View Post
    for a better understanding of how Turkey's border work, refer to this:
    Russia ?Violated? Turkish Airspace Because Turkey ?Moved? Its Border | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization

    you will understand bettwe what I meant that the Turkish F-16 had to enter the Syrian border as well. hehe

    http://21stcenturywire.com/wp-conten...ussian-jet.jpg
    Interesting. If this is the case, Turkey is taking a big gamble that Putin will just blink and let the matter go without retaliating since the country concerned is a NATO member.

  9. Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    25,189
    #9

  10. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,994
    #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Altis6453 View Post
    Interesting. If this is the case, Turkey is taking a big gamble that Putin will just blink and let the matter go without retaliating since the country concerned is a NATO member.
    there already talks behind the scenes of deescalating the situation.

    here is another map(Turkish government) showing the flight paths.

    It makes one wonder why the blue line stopped all of a sudden right on the border. hehehe

    if so, this would be the first time I've seen an F-16 intercept launching a missile beyond visual range at a 110 degree angle instead of launching straight ahead. hahaha

    the Su-24 at subsonic cruise (500-800 kph) should be able to cover 3.8 km (the distance covered during entry into turkish airspace) in about 17-28 seconds.

    the russian version of the flight paths suggests that the Su-24 was engaged within visual range



    there is already a similar incident on october 5 that ended smoothly.

    do note that 28 second window is such a short time for hailing, interrogation, warning, and *locking*. imagine it this way:

    turk: halt. identify yourself.

    rusky: I am russian. just passing by. do not shoot.

    turk: you are entering turkish airspace.

    rusky: all right, I am turning away. almost there.

    turk: too late, I already fired the missile.

    it makes KAL-007 incident look tame with the 3 hour window before getting shot down. hahaha
    Last edited by safeorigin; November 25th, 2015 at 10:17 PM.
    Damn, son! Where'd you find this?

  11. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,398
    #11
    Quote Originally Posted by safeorigin View Post
    if so, this would be the first time I've seen an F-16 intercept launching a missile beyond visual range at a 110 degree angle instead of launching straight ahead.
    I thought the Turks have AIM-9x which have off-angle lock-on in excess of 90 degrees.

  12. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,994
    #12
    even with a high off bore sensor, why not just shoot dead ahead? It's a much more optimal firing solution. it's not like the bomber is maneuvering hard anyway.

  13. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    8,492
    #13
    imageuploadedbytsikot-forums1448451601.337089.jpg


    --------------------------

  14. Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    25,276
    #14
    Nice post safeorigin. Makes sense imho.

    Sent from my LG-H818 using Tapatalk
    Fasten your seatbelt! Or else... Driven To Thrill!

  15. Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,580
    #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Ry_Tower View Post
    Nice post safeorigin. Makes sense imho.

    Sent from my LG-H818 using Tapatalk
    all posters in this thread do make sense. only OB who doesn't.

  16. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,994
    #16
    this furthers my suspicion: Rescued Su-24 Co-Pilot Rules Out Turkish Space Violation 'Even for Second'

    "There were no warnings. Not via the radio, not visually. There was no contact whatsoever. That's why we were keeping our combat course as usual. You have to understand what the cruising speed of a bomber is compared to an F-16. If they wanted to warn us, they could have shown themselves by heading on a parallel course. But there was nothing. And the rocket hit our tail completely unexpectedly. We didn't even see it in time to take evasive maneuvres."
    this is the guy who shot the Su-24M




    while NATO seemed to have deescalated, somebody is being naughty: Russia Says Turkey's Attack On Jet Was "Planned Provocation" As Ankara Moves Tanks Near Syrian Border | Zero Hedge

    turns out that the Su-24 entered the turkish border within 17 seconds. lol. how exactly do you warn the pilot in that span of time and manage to lock onto the bomber?
    Last edited by safeorigin; November 26th, 2015 at 01:41 AM.
    Damn, son! Where'd you find this?

  17. Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    25,189
    #17
    Having S-400 SAMs to the equation...

  18. Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    9,720
    #18
    Is it really safe to post the pilot's pic all over the place? Russian spies are scary ruthless(i mean, really, radioactive poison? Nobody uses cyanide or arsenic any more?)

  19. Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    3,650
    #19
    Russia bombed ISIS oil and Turkey's aid convoy. Meanwhile Hussein Obama stepped up his rhetoric, be scared ISIS Hussein Obama is going to kill you with his rhetoric.

    You might wonder why Hussein Obama refuses to bomb ISIS oil that's because of environmental concern. Yes, climate change is far more dangerous that a radical islamic.

  20. Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    3,006
    #20
    ^the syrians were drooling for s300 now they get something better

Tags for this Thread

Is WWIII  inevitable?