Results 371 to 380 of 1599
-
September 18th, 2019 01:25 PM #371
you wanna understand why they come to PH like they're just crossing from one province to another?
walang papeles
what if their govt told them PH is China territory
their behavior makes sense na no?
-
September 18th, 2019 02:35 PM #372
^what doesn't make sense is dutertes "visa upon entry" policy
Isinangla na ba ni duterte ang pilipinas sa mga chekwa?
Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
- Posts
- 754
September 18th, 2019 02:37 PM #373Ah the good ol' story of the Middle Kingdom and the tributaries. Talk about delusions of past glory...
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
- Posts
- 754
September 18th, 2019 02:42 PM #374
-
September 18th, 2019 03:04 PM #375
Kaya nga it's really unfair, kami, we have to go thru the eye of the needle just to get a working visa sa China, may interview pa ako niyan minsan every year sa immigration and take note of this "China National Security Agency", just to know maybe if I'm a threat to national security, anak ng 🤬 nga naman, and then yung mga chinese parang ang bilis mag work sa pinas .
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk
-
September 18th, 2019 03:20 PM #376
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 1,668
September 18th, 2019 03:53 PM #377Tit for tat dapat. China requires us to apply for visa to go there. We can do same.
But we need investments, so we won't.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk
-
September 19th, 2019 09:41 PM #378
Half naked chinese national eating at chowking gensan
Sent from my ASUS_Z00AD using Tapatalk
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
- Posts
- 754
September 19th, 2019 10:14 PM #379But is that going to force China out of the territories they occupied in WPS? Freedom of navigation operations are merely forms of posturing. Driving away those stubborn Chinese would require an armed confrontation which will likely escalate into a hot war. Other powerful nations won't commit to an economic or military conflict with China over some islands because it's still in their best interest to maintain trade relations.
Moving forward with the joint exploration and exploitation deal is the best option. It might be seen as "selling out" but the current situation demands PH to play realpolitik.
-
September 20th, 2019 01:23 AM #380
^it won't drive the chinese out of these territories occupied recently but they cant go build more artificial islands, they cant proceed on taking pagasa island with maritime militias without invocation of mutual defense treaty
The Americans withdrew from the INF treaty to be ready to strike back at china should the Chinese decide to pull the trigger
South china sea isn't exclusive chinese territory..that's what the Hague ruling is all about and the world powers are enforcing it
Trading is an inherent right of every nation..claiming territories is another matter
Sent from my SM-A520W using TapatalkLast edited by kisshmet; September 20th, 2019 at 01:25 AM.
as an aside, in the olden days, anyone who does not move 'ala luksa during Holy Week, especially...
Traffic!