New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 36 of 273 FirstFirst ... 263233343536373839404686136 ... LastLast
Results 351 to 360 of 2721
  1. Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    27
    #351
    Quote Originally Posted by Noel Salisipan View Post
    Hindi kaya 7.9li/100km ito?
    (If so, it gives 12.65kpl! Still a good FC. City Driving ba Bro?)
    sorry sir, nagkabaligtad. that's right, 7.9li/100km. city and highway driving sir.

  2. Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,756
    #352
    Quote Originally Posted by ice_913 View Post
    sorry sir, nagkabaligtad. that's right, 7.9li/100km. city and highway driving sir.
    City Driving?

  3. Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,406
    #353
    Quote Originally Posted by larry0609 View Post
    Mine has logged 2638km. Refilled last Sunday and it needs 16.8 liters to get it full tank. So, to correct my previous entry, bale add 52km going to Dagupan kaya total distance travelled is 297km kaya average FC is 17.67km/liter
    Meron bang difference manual calculation at yung nasa trip computer? The trip computer should indicate close to 5.7liter/100km

  4. Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    27
    #354
    Quote Originally Posted by Noel Salisipan View Post
    City Driving?
    yes sir then every weekend nlex.

  5. Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    27
    #355
    Quote Originally Posted by dfopiso View Post
    Meron bang difference manual calculation at yung nasa trip computer? The trip computer should indicate close to 5.7liter/100km
    meron po, kasi yung sa trip meter is 12.65kms. per liter while the manual calculation gives me 10.8 kms. per liter.

  6. Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    26,781
    #356
    Quote Originally Posted by dfopiso View Post
    Meron bang difference manual calculation at yung nasa trip computer? The trip computer should indicate close to 5.7liter/100km

    A slight difference. But it should be close probably +/-5%.

  7. Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,406
    #357
    Quote Originally Posted by ice_913 View Post
    meron po, kasi yung sa trip meter is 12.65kms. per liter while the manual calculation gives me 10.8 kms. per liter.
    that is almost 15% difference? (12.65-10.8)/12.65 x 100%

  8. Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    117
    #358
    Quote Originally Posted by Noel Salisipan View Post

    Paano ba orientation ng sa display mo bro?
    l/100km po....

  9. Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,756
    #359
    Quote Originally Posted by dfopiso View Post
    that is almost 15% difference? (12.65-10.8)/12.65 x 100%
    Trip meter & manual calculation are true only for a continous trip, once you turned off the engine especially for a long period of time, the trip meter will reset by itself.

    Pag putol-putol ang byahe, yung pinakahuli lang ang mareregister, at hindi average nung all trips.

  10. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,702
    #360
    Onboard fuel economy computers are off by at least 5%... up to 20% for some cars.

    In city traffic, try to apply fuel saving techniques to minimize consumption. The CX-5's direct injection engine is very smooth off idle, and you can accelerate from very low rpms. Accelerate from low rpm at high throttle openings in pulses, then let off and cruise to the next traffic light/traffic stop/intersection or choke point.

    I believe that at a steady 60-70 km/h, the CX-5 should be capable of well over 20 km/l over long trips. I've seen around 18+.

    One writer in the US did a 300 mile trip at a steady 60 mph. That's around 400 kms at 96 km/h. Got 27 km/l by the trip computer, calculated it out to 23 km/l when corrected via full tank measure and GPS odometer correction.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

Mazda CX-5