New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 26 of 273 FirstFirst ... 162223242526272829303676126 ... LastLast
Results 251 to 260 of 2721
  1. Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2
    #251
    Quote Originally Posted by Vertigo View Post
    I use Petron Extra. I think friend Larry uses Blaze or V-Power.
    Therefore caltex gold which is 95RON is OK to use and will
    give better performance. Thanks ;-)

  2. Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    6
    #252
    Just want to share. . . Recently got my CX5 and drove to Vigan with total of 853km even before my first 1000km check up. My fc reading when I got back is 7.3l/100km. Not sure how good/bad this is. Im using Petron XCS.

  3. Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,036
    #253
    13.6 km/liter yan. ok for a 2 liter car

  4. Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    6
    #254
    13.7km/l actually :-)

  5. Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,756
    #255
    Quote Originally Posted by gaile View Post
    Just want to share. . . Recently got my CX5 and drove to Vigan with total of 853km even before my first 1000km check up. My fc reading when I got back is 7.3l/100km. Not sure how good/bad this is. Im using Petron XCS.

    Nice na yan bro lalo na kung may hataw mode pa yung drive mo.

    AT ba yan o MT?

  6. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    6,385
    #256
    Wow! Wonderful FC for a 2.0L gas suv!

  7. Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    754
    #257
    Quote Originally Posted by niky View Post
    The 2nd Gen CR-V is really a huge guzzler, even with the 2.0. Something about the tuning of the K20 variant that went in that car. The 3rd gen with the R20 is much, much better... and even the third gen with the K24 and AWD is better than the old 2.0... I remember driving that through the hills of Tanay for a photoshoot and watching the fuel gauge go down, down, down...

    My uncle complained about his 2nd gen CR-V AWD. Said it was more economical to take out his Ford Explorer (old 4.0) on the highway because it drank less gas!

    The 3rd gen CR-V is much better... much better transmission, better engine tuning. Our 2.4 still does 5-7 in traffic... but what do you expect? It's a fricking 2.4. The 2.5 CX7 is a match for our car and the 2.4 RAV4 in terms of fuel economy. It's a "guzzler" only if you compare it to a compact 1.6...

    But seeing the CX5, I understand why they dropped the CX7. The CX5 has similar interior space and trunk space yet is smaller... much more efficient packaging than the CX7.
    I see. That's why I was wondering why there are mixed feedback regarding FC of the 2nd gen CRV. The 3rd gen 2.4 is normal for 5-7 for city driving. Have yet to reach 6 for Xtrail CVT. My last FC is 5.4 using Caltex Gold, almost same FC as Caltex Silver.

    *Vertigo - Your FC is still good even at 9km/L for city driving. Almost on par with 1.8L engines.

  8. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,452
    #258
    Quote Originally Posted by gaile View Post
    Just want to share. . . Recently got my CX5 and drove to Vigan with total of 853km even before my first 1000km check up. My fc reading when I got back is 7.3l/100km. Not sure how good/bad this is. Im using Petron XCS.
    wow that's very good, around 13.7km/li of fuel. ang 1.5MT Jazz ko nga eh around 6.8-7.1li/100Km with mixed City and Hiway drive.... with that economy probably hindi ma-traffic going up North?

  9. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,452
    #259
    Comparisons comparisons: while its more of like Apples to Orange comparison....it just show's how well designed and executed this car really is.... too bad no opportunity to buy the high-tech new Diesel engine...

    readon
    Mazda CX-5 vs rivals | Group tests | Auto Express

  10. Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    8,392
    #260
    so far, ang ganda naman ng FC ng 5

    hope someone soon posts their manual FC computation


Mazda CX-5