New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 700 of 991 FirstFirst ... 600650690696697698699700701702703704710750800 ... LastLast
Results 13,981 to 14,000 of 19802
  1. Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    3,006
    #13981
    Quote Originally Posted by Ry_Tower View Post
    No need to fight China; We can share – Duterte >> Manila Bulletin News

    Ok naman talaga sharing pero bakit kasi sa China pa na inaagaw nga ang teritoryo natin. Pwede naman sa Shell/Chevron tutal meron na partnership sa Malampaya.

    Sa China kasi dehado tayo masyado.
    china will take it ALL..thats what their claim in the area is for

    Sent from my ASUS Chromebook C202SA using Tapatalk

  2. Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    3,006
    #13982
    Quote Originally Posted by jick.cejoco View Post
    Lalaban sana, kaya lang ang hina ng philippine military. Sige na nga, share na lang ng sovereignty. Bayot kasi ang military natin, puro tapang na lang
    peke nga ang tapang ni duterte

    kung yung nakulimbat at itinago ni marcos na yaman ng pinas sa ibang bansa ay naipambili natin ng submarino at air defense systems may laban tayo

    kaso hangat may mga pinuno tayo na sarili lang nila ang inuuuna kawawa tayo sa mga manlulupig

    Sent from my ASUS Chromebook C202SA using Tapatalk
    Last edited by kisshmet; May 21st, 2018 at 02:45 PM.

  3. Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    7,119
    #13983
    Quote Originally Posted by zoomzoom View Post
    Teka, hindi ko pa narerenew Instik passport ko.
    Buti na lang mukha kaming intsik ng pamilya ko. 😂

    Quote Originally Posted by jick.cejoco View Post
    Ang mamatay ng dahil sa 'yo.




    Sige, sinong gusto mamatay����
    Kung kelangan, ako na lang. Di na rin naman ako bata bro. Pero ililipat ko muna family ko. Kaso di naman yata tatanggap ang AFP ng mga youngish. ☺

  4. Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5,167
    #13984
    Quote Originally Posted by kisshmet View Post
    peke nga ang tapang ni duterte

    kung yung nakulimbat at itinago ni marcos na yaman ng pinas sa ibang bansa ay naipambili natin ng submarino at air defense systems may laban tayo

    kaso hangat may mga pinuno tayo na sarili lang nila ang inuuuna kawawa tayo sa mga manlulupig

    Sent from my ASUS Chromebook C202SA using Tapatalk





    Your "manlulupig " comes from within, elected by bobovoters. The philippines "run like hell by Filipinos". Candidates spend millions to run with an expected salary as a "public servant " only in the hundreds of thousands, you do the math.

  5. Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    3,006
    #13985
    ^the manlulupigs are from the outside who manipulates our compatriots to betray their nation

    the philippines is deprived of selfless leaders who put their countries interest first before their own

    Sent from my ASUS Chromebook C202SA using Tapatalk
    Last edited by kisshmet; May 21st, 2018 at 05:13 PM.

  6. Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    25,276
    #13986
    Quote Originally Posted by jick.cejoco View Post
    Your "manlulupig " comes from within, elected by bobovoters. The philippines "run like hell by Filipinos". Candidates spend millions to run with an expected salary as a "public servant " only in the hundreds of thousands, you do the math.
    Before ganyan, after the 2016 elections, we have what we call an organized machination of China to install a puppet gov't.

  7. Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    299
    #13987
    Quote Originally Posted by Ry_Tower View Post
    Before ganyan, after the 2016 elections, we have what we call an organized machination of China to install a puppet gov't.
    And we all thought Binay was the worst among them in 2016.

  8. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    40,599
    #13988
    Quote Originally Posted by Trippin View Post
    And we all thought Binay was the worst among them in 2016.
    I called it then. We are better off with binay than duterte.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    1,018
    #13989
    If my history and short research is correct.

    1937 - Japan invaded the whole of South China Sea.
    1947 - China marks South China Sea claim - the nine dash line. Was formally 11 dash line.
    1951 - Treaty of San Francisco. Japan renounces all claim on South China Sea.
    1974 - Beijing builds military installation, airfield and harbor on Woody Island, the largest of the Paracels. Vietnam plants first permanent installation on Spratlys.
    1982 - UNCLOS established.
    1988 - China sinks 3 Vietnamese ships, killing 74 sailors, one of the most serious confrontation on the South China Sea.
    1992 - China passes law on territorial sea.

    ---

    The problem is really old. China has been at it since 1947. None of us here exist yet. lol

  10. Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    1,018
    #13990
    I think we are not the only region with overlapping EEZs. Thank you so much UNCLOS for the overlapping EEZs that created so much conflicts which they also cannot police.

    1) Canada and United states: Beaufort Sea
    2) Canada and France: Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon
    3) Croatia, Italy and Slovenia: Adriatic Sea
    4) Turkey and Cyprus: south of Cyprus
    5) Lebanon, Cyprus and Israel: Overlapping EEZ

  11. Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    25,276
    #13991
    Quote Originally Posted by brushless View Post
    I think we are not the only region with overlapping EEZs. Thank you so much UNCLOS for the overlapping EEZs that created so much conflicts which they also cannot police.

    1) Canada and United states: Beaufort Sea
    2) Canada and France: Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon
    3) Croatia, Italy and Slovenia: Adriatic Sea
    4) Turkey and Cyprus: south of Cyprus
    5) Lebanon, Cyprus and Israel: Overlapping EEZ
    If you are reasonable wala naman conflict eh. If may pareho kayong claim then hahatiin niyo dapat area.

    Simple example ia a strait na 100 kms lang. Since may 2 countries in bith sides, their EEZ will be 50kms only from the shoreline.

    I think it is possible to have a compromise sa south china sea basta lahat ng claimants before going to arbitration will agree to respect the decision. Tignan mo China, ayaw naman sumunod kaya useless.

    The UNCLOS is a good law but has no teeth because no one country or the UN can enforce it withouth violence.

    Sent from my LG-H990 using Tapatalk
    Fasten your seatbelt! Or else... Driven To Thrill!

  12. Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    1,018
    #13992
    ^If only that was simple. Until now, the countries listed above are still in conflict.

    UNCLOS was merely established in 1982.

    "Some of its provisions are so vague and imperfect that UNCLOS itself may provide little specific guidance for resolving oceans and law of the sea issues among States." - The Law of the Sea and Northeast Asia: A Challenge for Cooperation By Hŭi-gwŏn Pak, p.2

    "It is a known fact that UNCLOS contains many ambiguous provisions as a result of compromises reached among States in order to reconcile their conflicting interests and differing views." - Keynote Speech by Judge Shunji YANAI of International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

    ----

    By the way, US did not or will never sign the UNCLOS treaty. It remains outside the convention.

    It kind of makes you wonder why.

    China can also leave UNCLOS if it wishes to. China signed UNCLOS only in 1996.

  13. Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    3,650
    #13993
    Mukha ngang masama ang UNCLOS at overlapping EEZ. Panalo paring ang nine dash line ng China.

    Mahiya kayo 11 dash line yan before. Nag compromise na ang China, ginawa na lang nilang 9 dash line.

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

  14. Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    25,189
    #13994
    Does the US, Australia or Japan even recognize the claim of PHL over the West Philippine Sea?

  15. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,501
    #13995
    Quote Originally Posted by Monseratto View Post
    Does the US, Australia or Japan even recognize the claim of PHL over the West Philippine Sea?
    At the very least they want freedom of navigation in the area. Having China militarize the SCS hinders both military and commercial movement.

  16. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    45,927
    #13996

  17. Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    25,276
    #13997
    Quote Originally Posted by brushless View Post
    ^If only that was simple. Until now, the countries listed above are still in conflict.

    UNCLOS was merely established in 1982.

    "Some of its provisions are so vague and imperfect that UNCLOS itself may provide little specific guidance for resolving oceans and law of the sea issues among States." - The Law of the Sea and Northeast Asia: A Challenge for Cooperation By Hŭi-gwŏn Pak, p.2

    "It is a known fact that UNCLOS contains many ambiguous provisions as a result of compromises reached among States in order to reconcile their conflicting interests and differing views." - Keynote Speech by Judge Shunji YANAI of International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

    ----

    By the way, US did not or will never sign the UNCLOS treaty. It remains outside the convention.

    It kind of makes you wonder why.

    China can also leave UNCLOS if it wishes to. China signed UNCLOS only in 1996.
    Kaya nga sabi ko diba unless willing to settle down lahat ng claimants and agree before hand to respect any decision from any tribunal magulo yan.

  18. Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    1,018
    #13998
    In the perspective of China, it is merely protecting its 9 dash line claim (was 11) since 1912 where no countries in South East Asia were even contesting it. South East Asian countries and China were at peace with each other.

    Come 1982, when UNCLOS was established and the EEZ ruling took effect, territories began overlapping, with each country asserting its rights according to the problematic EEZ.

    While the US refuses to sign the treaty.

    So, that's the short of the story.

    ---

    Problem: How do we resolve the EEZ problem with China in a peaceful manner? We have to take note that we are merely late participants of this territorial claim when UNCLOS was established in 1982.

    We have 3 options:

    1) Go to war with China with our allies. Kindly note we are not talking about WW2 era weapons. We are talking about advance weaponry and nuclear capabilities on both sides. Severe destruction on our country and the rest of South East Asia.

    2) Diplomatic protest till kingdom come, souring ties with China. Worse, cutting ties completely with economic consequences. We will still go to war eventually as it escalates. Same same, only delayed.

    3) Peaceful negotiations. You lose some, you win some and get over with it. With economic benefits and friendly ties. Let the US war with China alone to assert open seas. Whoever wins, we will still be at peace with both countries.

    My 2 cents worth.

  19. Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    354
    #13999
    hindi ba parte na nang pilipinas yung ibang nasa loob ng 9-dash line (ie scarborough shoal) nuong panahon pa ng mga espanyol?

    sa mga lumang mapa, kasama na sa pilipinas ang scarborough shoal

    samantalang napagtripan lang isama nung mga instik (Taiwan) sa mapa nila yung 11 o 9 dash mga 1950s na?



    by the way, yung Taiwan may existing claim din ata sa islands sa Batanes

    kaya hindi malayong maging probinsya talaga tayo ng china

  20. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    45,927
    #14000
    but of course the anti-du30 crowd conveniently ignore rising commodities prices and USDPHP exchange rate and blame everything on TRAIN





Tags for this Thread

Digong, The President