CHATBOX (kuno kasi walang chatbox sa tsikot)

[_Cathy_]

My AC/Poveda friends are not limited to people my age. Older friends of mine who are professionals and business owners have shared stories of their younger days and it's not that different from when I was in highschool and with kids in highschool these days. Technology has changed a lot but teens have always had raging hormones.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Maybe I belong to a circle of prudes but I really don't know any girl who started having *** in HS, mostly college talaga.

I know boys who started in HS from my chinese friends and they paid for it haha. May binabanggit silang lugar letter M forgot na

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

[bugsmobile]

Maybe I belong to a circle of prudes but I really don't know any girl who started having *** in HS, mostly college talaga.

I know boys who started in HS from my chinese friends and they paid for it haha. May binabanggit silang lugar letter M forgot na

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

Depends sa group siguro. My college ex started having *** when she was in hs.

M? Maalikaya?

[_Cathy_]

sa henerasyon natin meron dalawa nabuntis lol

puro vhs **** hahahah

HS? Wow. I'm sure meron talaga who start in HS. But how common was it in the 80s, 90s, 2000s and 2010s.

Tama talaga yung slutty friend ko (I tell her slut siya at aminado siya lol) never have evidence of your kalokohan hehe. Pero teens nowadays kasi grew up in social media and camera phones

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

[_Cathy_]

Depends sa group siguro. My college ex started having *** when she was in hs.

M? Maalikaya?

Inisip ko nga kung sa group but I don't belong in the nerd, bullied or boring group naman haha

YES MAALIKAYA!!! I think it's a massage or spa place? My first love is Fil Chi kasi and there was a time my circle revolved around them, yan yung parati nababanggit ng naughty barkada niya.

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

[heavenlee]

- PSHS counted each time the photo was shared as 1 count, so each boy ended up with several counts, hence the recommendation.
- Issue was raised to BOT, who counted the entire incident as just 1 count, so only community service was handed down to the boys.

I'm confused sir, what's the difference between a Level III offense and the offense these perverts commited for which 2 counts must be considered before they are not allowed to graduate? Because from this news article, if I understood correctly, it is saying that these students committed a Level III offense, so automatically they should not be allowed to graduate -- no more counting how many incidents.



"The PSHS-MC Executive Parents Teachers Council stated that the male students committed an offense under the PSHS System Student Code of Conduct, particularly Part 5.3.2. of Level III which reads:

“Engaging in any form of voyeurism which includes the posting of indecent or lewd photos or videos on the internet.”

Further, any student who has committed a “two major offenses” or at least a “level III” type of offense within a school year shall not be allowed to graduate."

Students involved in voyeurism but allowed to graduate has parents in uproar - Interaksyon

[heavenlee]

i will render my own judgement, after i am made clear on the complete facts of the case.

For what it's worth, sir, here are some facts coming for this news article:

1) "certain male students of the school were allowed to graduate despite sharing naked pictures of their ex-girlfriends—some of whom are still minors—among themselves and on the internet."

2) "the male students are “not minors.”"


3) "The PSHS-MC Executive Parents Teachers Council stated that the male students committed an offense under the PSHS System Student Code of Conduct, particularly Part 5.3.2. of Level III which reads:

“Engaging in any form of voyeurism which includes the posting of indecent or lewd photos or videos on the internet.”

Further, any student who has committed a “two major offenses” or at least a “level III” type of offense within a school year shall not be allowed to graduate."

4) Not only did these students violate school conduct and rules, they also violated

"Republic Act 9262 or the Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Act of 2004, according to the council."

So I guess these victims can also file a case against the offenders in the proper court.


Students involved in voyeurism but allowed to graduate has parents in uproar - Interaksyon

[heavenlee]

HS? Wow. I'm sure meron talaga who start in HS. But how common was it in the 80s, 90s, 2000s and 2010s.

Tama talaga yung slutty friend ko (I tell her slut siya at aminado siya lol) never have evidence of your kalokohan hehe. Pero teens nowadays kasi grew up in social media and camera phones

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

I guess the reason why it's not "so common" back then is that people knew how to keep secrets better back then. Now, not so much. People just became more and more liberated. Public displays of affection back then would be ashamed of what's being displayed by couples out in the open today.


Also, parents before were more hands on in rearing their kids. Now? Single parents abound, and usually more times, both parents are not even around -- both are working.

As for S3x, I know quite a number of people of both s3xes who got devirginized in their teens, while in High School. Today, I hear of students in Grade 7 (12 yr. old) making out.

[jut703]

Maybe I belong to a circle of prudes but I really don't know any girl who started having *** in HS, mostly college talaga.

I know boys who started in HS from my chinese friends and they paid for it haha. May binabanggit silang lugar letter M forgot na

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

Hanggang ngayon naman mostly college pa rin ang first time ng mga tao. But as with most things, there's a bell curve so there will be people who will experience things earlier.

Also note that with SHS, the same age as a freshman/sophomore in college before will just be a Grade 11/12 student today, which is still high school.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

[jut703]

I'm confused sir, what's the difference between a Level III offense and the offense these perverts commited for which 2 counts must be considered before they are not allowed to graduate? Because from this news article, if I understood correctly, it is saying that these students committed a Level III offense, so automatically they should not be allowed to graduate -- no more counting how many incidents.



"The PSHS-MC Executive Parents Teachers Council stated that the male students committed an offense under the PSHS System Student Code of Conduct, particularly Part 5.3.2. of Level III which reads:

“Engaging in any form of voyeurism which includes the posting of indecent or lewd photos or videos on the internet.”

Further, any student who has committed a “two major offenses” or at least a “level III” type of offense within a school year shall not be allowed to graduate."

Students involved in voyeurism but allowed to graduate has parents in uproar - Interaksyon

This is the PSHS-MC ManCom statement on the matter:



1 level 3 offense = can graduate
2 or more level 3 offenses = can't graduate

Not sure where GMA got their wording but if that's written in an official black and white statement then it makes it easier to fight for the case as it's not only the morally correct but also technically correct.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

[heavenlee]

What use is a brilliant mind if it isn't led by a morally-grounded heart.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Very well said, sir. I remember a young Ferdinand Marcos who literally got away with murder simply because the judge thought he was a waste of a brilliant mind if he will be languishing and wasting his life in prison for that crime. And where did the whole country end up because of that judge's sentiments?

[heavenlee]

This is the PSHS-MC ManCom statement on the matter:



1 level 3 offense = can graduate
2 or more level 3 offenses = can't graduate

Not sure where GMA got their wording but if that's written in an official black and white statement then it makes it easier to fight for the case as it's not only the morally correct but also technically correct.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Alas, some people are just robots -- following the letter of the law to a T, and letting criminals off the hook because of technicalities. Unless some BOT members are protecting some interests, we can only speculate. It is a most unfortunate matter. I hope the victims can get better justice from the courts.

[MR_BIG18]

Maybe in your generation but not in mine. *** in HS was not common. 14 is way too young.

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

with my generation and my circle of friends...it was

[dr. d]

I have several batchmates in the faculty of Pisay right now, plus all of my previous teachers of course, some of which are part if the disciplinary committee. So I can say with certainty that the recommendation for non-graduation is warranted.

Toplines:
- Victims were ex-girlfriends of the perpetrators
- During the course of their relationships, girls sent nudes to boys. Not really shocking, it's gotten quite common with kids nowadays.
- When they broke up, guys started trading pictures of their exes to other guys.
- Eventually, things got shared more broadly online. Think of the "Pastor Hokage" craze before.
- The issue was raised to the Disciplinary Officers of PSHS, and according to the handbook - 1 count of voyeurism is community service, 2 or more counts is expulsion.
- PSHS counted each time the photo was shared as 1 count, so each boy ended up with several counts, hence the recommendation.
- Issue was raised to BOT, who counted the entire incident as just 1 count, so only community service was handed down to the boys.

The outrage of alumni and staff is that this whole turn of events goes against the "Pursuit of the Untarnished Truth", which is one of the tenets of the school.

What use is a brilliant mind if it isn't led by a morally-grounded heart.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

the future does seem bleak for these students.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Alas, some people are just robots -- following the letter of the law to a T, and letting criminals off the hook because of technicalities. Unless some BOT members are protecting some interests, we can only speculate. It is a most unfortunate matter. I hope the victims can get better justice from the courts.

the law is all about technicalities.

[Sarsi]

Alin kaya mas masarap?[emoji848]

Tagal ng kape ko

[dr. d]

Alin kaya mas masarap?[emoji848]

Tagal ng kape ko

when in doubt... try both!

[CVT]

I have several batchmates in the faculty of Pisay right now, plus all of my previous teachers of course, some of which are part if the disciplinary committee. So I can say with certainty that the recommendation for non-graduation is warranted.

Toplines:
- Victims were ex-girlfriends of the perpetrators
- During the course of their relationships, girls sent nudes to boys. Not really shocking, it's gotten quite common with kids nowadays.
- When they broke up, guys started trading pictures of their exes to other guys.
- Eventually, things got shared more broadly online. Think of the "Pastor Hokage" craze before.
- The issue was raised to the Disciplinary Officers of PSHS, and according to the handbook - 1 count of voyeurism is community service, 2 or more counts is expulsion.
- PSHS counted each time the photo was shared as 1 count, so each boy ended up with several counts, hence the recommendation.
- Issue was raised to BOT, who counted the entire incident as just 1 count, so only community service was handed down to the boys.

The outrage of alumni and staff is that this whole turn of events goes against the "Pursuit of the Untarnished Truth", which is one of the tenets of the school.

What use is a brilliant mind if it isn't led by a morally-grounded heart.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

So Dear BOT, what constitutes count 2 and count 3?

The problems with our country,- almost everyone can be corrupted, and it's done in the spirit of forgiveness... This has to stop

[Ry_Tower]

Just a moment...

Sa halip na serbisyo sa taumbaya ang iisipin at aatupagin eh maglalaro na lang mga yan. Bawal na nga maglaro during office hours eh.

[_Cathy_]

Seriously?



Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

[shadow]

Seriously?



Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

Delete na lahat ng DDS ng posts nila in support of EJK. [emoji23]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[chronicle]

^
Pati email at phone number.
Well, it is their country, so they can do anything they want.

Kung wala namang masamang ginawa, wala naman sigurong dapat ikatakot.

Sent from my BLL-L22 using Tapatalk