andaming na release na mu-x dito sa cagayan valley yung isang nakasalubong ko habulan sila ng tbz
andaming na release na mu-x dito sa cagayan valley yung isang nakasalubong ko habulan sila ng tbz
Got mine last Saturday 4x2 AT through Bank PO. Waited for 2.5 months but sulit na sulit ang paghihintay.... Balita ko may lalabas pa ulit next week.
Tyaga lang mga bro at dadating din
Ganun ba? Pinangakuan ako december daw dadating unit ko. Anyway, kung wala nasa akin pa naman old unit ko. Thanks for the info bro.
Kung di rin ako tatawagan kanila na unit nila. Try ko maginquire sa ibang dealership.
lipat na kayo sa ibang brand, though malabo lang image pero nakuha ko ang sinasabi ng MUX na 18KM/liter sa the same 4X2 AT na SUV. wag kayo papaloko sa hot items, palamigin nyo muna bago kayo magdecide kung kukuha talaga kayo ng MU X. ako bye bye na since last week at hapi me sa bago kong unit, pareho pa ng presyo ng MUX, libre pa TPL, LTO, seat cover, rain visor at standard freebies.
Nyek, eh instantaneous consumption naman yan.
Kung 18 km/L based on average consumption na full tank method, saka ako maiimpress.
nope, tanungin nyo Mitsubishi dealer sa MS GLS V, i started the reset at Toll Plaza balintawak til Sn. Fdo toll gate and that is the result. I will pose the FT-FT method later. MS GLS V has no intantenous reading ng fuel efficiency. sa MU X nung nag test drive ako, 2 ang fuel efficiency reading, one is instantenous the other one is average.
This only proves that what the MU X can do sa fuel efficiency reading is misleading. This can be achieved also by other brands. I have no qualms over sa MU X if they say they can beat the other competitors sa FC, but I still believe that engine technology is just a minor factor for fuel efficiency. Major factor pa rin ang driving habits, road conditions, vehicle weight, engine displacement and other factors.
I will just further say that don't be coyed by their Fuel Efficiency rating just to buy MUX. If you feel that you want to buy MUX dahil yun ang nasa sa puso mo then do so and also if you are a fan of Isuzu. For the others, it's better to read further sa ibang site for the review of your choice of SUV, pag aralan mabuti. yun lang.
Mas matipid talaga ang isuzu vs the montero. I owned both the strada and now the dmax. The dmax having a bigger engine is more fuel efficient. Pero kung sa fuel efficiency lang, mas matipid ang ranger. Tho it has a 2.2 engine.
ikaw na rin nagsabing nasa driving habits etc. kung kayang bumili ng milyones na sasakyan mas kaya naman nilang magkarga ng krudo at saka por dyos por santo kaya ka nga bumibili ng sasakyan para sa comfort mo kung fuel efficiency na lang lagi ang pinag-uusapan malamang puro micro cars na lang makikita mo sa kalsada.
Amen! Thats why i bought mu-x coz i love the car and its my money.di ko alam kung bat nya binuboyo yung iba na mag back out.baka S.A. ng mitsu?mu-x is the new model unlike monty is an old one.maybe a year may all new monty na eh luma na agad yong car nya.na launch na all new strada,malamang new monty na susunod.
Yes, it is. But it's the same for all the trucks. Buuut... in my testing where I've done full tank to full tank, I've seen similar numbers. The MU-X can really do over 20 km/l... point-to-point... basta highway only.![]()
Vehicle weight, when both vehicles are between 1.9 to 2.0 tons, minor.
Good driving habits? Good driving habits on a more efficient car will give you spectacular economy.
Engine displacement alone doesn't mean anything. The Mirage 1.2 is more efficient than a lot of 1.0s. It's only the 800s that actually do better (in the city), but that's already a nearly 50% downgrade in size! From 2.5 to 3.0, there's little size difference... and a 3.0 tuned for fuel economy will trounce a 2.5 tuned for power.
Quite true. But the MU-X has other benefits besides economy.
The MS still beats it in terms of ride comfort (depending on tires and variant) and power, but for those who don't care about "rezing rezing", there's a lot to like about the MU-X.
In traffic, maybe... I still want to do an Eco-run between the D-Max and Ranger 2.2. Though apparently the new "low power" D-Max 2.5 is really economical. Don't think the 27 km/l they claim is realistic, but I'd like to see how far over 20 it does get.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...