All New Isuzu MU-X // Alterra Next Generation

[LancerA174A]

Compared kasi sa higher output vehicles in its class with same engine displacement. Conservative tuning kasi talaga ang isuzu kaya lower (but not under) power siya.

Ry_Tower, may maipagmamalaki ka pa sa Pajero na yan. Lumalamon ng dumi yan. Walang pinipiling fuel. Inaawitan ko nga ang FM pajero ng friend ko eh. Ayaw ibigay. Sobrang reliable daw.

I really don't get how people (even journalists na hindi pa nga na ttest drive) nag cclaim na underpowered yun.

They think they know better than Isuzu themselves when the company has been in the powertrain industry for decades already? How about the Elf, Giga, Gala? Underpowered din ba yang mga yan?

[GTcervan]

I really don't get how people (even journalists na hindi pa nga na ttest drive) nag cclaim na underpowered yun.

They think they know better than Isuzu themselves when the company has been in the powertrain industry for decades already? How about the Elf, Giga, Gala? Underpowered din ba yang mga yan?

Pati mga Crosswind at HiLander ba kasama din sa sinasabi nilang underpowered?

[HUMABOL KA]

they say underpowered daw ang mux 2.5, but based dto sa video na ito ng 2.2 everest which is rated at 160 ps and 385 nm of torque parehas lang naman ng 0-100 km/h sprint ng 2.5 vgs ng mux. 0-100 kmh of 2.2 everest took 13+ seconds din

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEpAfM8ej2M

[HUMABOL KA]

.............

[Ry_Tower]

Compared kasi sa higher output vehicles in its class with same engine displacement. Conservative tuning kasi talaga ang isuzu kaya lower (but not under) power siya.

Ry_Tower, may maipagmamalaki ka pa sa Pajero na yan. Lumalamon ng dumi yan. Walang pinipiling fuel. Inaawitan ko nga ang FM pajero ng friend ko eh. Ayaw ibigay. Sobrang reliable daw.

Baka daw kasi i-modify mo tapos inggitin mo siya.

I also remember yung punto ni dmac na isuzu publishes yung actual torque. Hindi yung computed torque. Kaya iba talaga feeling nung nasubukan mo idrive at yung spec sheets lang.

Plus yung published calim din nila na 500,000kms (B10) rating nanag engine, it shows na may dahilan bakit detuned siya. For reliability and efficiency talaga.

yes a 500Nm 200Hp SUV is nice to have but for its purpose, the MuX's hp and torque rating should not be a deal-breaker. Looks, driving dynamics, cabin space, gadgets and toys puwede pa kasi baka need talaga yun.

[Ry_Tower]

they say underpowered daw ang mux 2.5, but based dto sa video na ito ng 2.2 everest which is rated at 160 ps and 385 nm of torque parehas lang naman ng 0-100 km/h sprint ng 2.5 vgs ng mux. 0-100 kmh of 2.2 everest took 13+ seconds din

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEpAfM8ej2M

Even the top speed halos pareho lang sa suppossed na malalakas na SUV. Eh bakit ganun kung underpowered. hehehe


Croswind/hilander underpowered kung compared sa CRDi na innova. Pero during it's time in the 90's. Best in class yan. hehehe

[HUMABOL KA]

Even the top speed halos pareho lang sa suppossed na malalakas na SUV. Eh bakit ganun kung underpowered. hehehe


Croswind/hilander underpowered kung compared sa CRDi na innova. Pero during it's time in the 90's. Best in class yan. hehehe

yup most of the mid sized suv naman po ay naka pako na sa 180 kmh topspeed dahil mabilis na po un sa mga mid size suv, and tingin ko din parehas lang nilang maabot ang topspeed with the same span of time, although on paper mas mataas power figures ng everest mas mabigat naman ng d hamak to kaya wala din naman palang advantage in terms of real world performance against the mux 2.5 vgs.

sabi nga nila importante ang power to weight ratio.

[HUMABOL KA]

......................

[LancerA174A]

Even the top speed halos pareho lang sa suppossed na malalakas na SUV. Eh bakit ganun kung underpowered. hehehe


Croswind/hilander underpowered kung compared sa CRDi na innova. Pero during it's time in the 90's. Best in class yan. hehehe

Agree, compared sa modern Innova siguro oo pero for hauling and longevity hands down 4JA1 pa din.

I actually find our Hi-Lander better than our A/T mu-X when accelerating from standstill. Ang lakas pa din ng hatak. Hehe.

Medyo OT, now that they have a new small turbodiesel, no reason not to develop an Innova fighter na.

[Djerms]

they say underpowered daw ang mux 2.5, but based dto sa video na ito ng 2.2 everest which is rated at 160 ps and 385 nm of torque parehas lang naman ng 0-100 km/h sprint ng 2.5 vgs ng mux. 0-100 kmh of 2.2 everest took 13+ seconds din

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEpAfM8ej2M

Walangya....ambigat na nga ng everest, heavyweights pa yung mga nag test ng 0-100 hihihihi.

[HUMABOL KA]

Walangya....ambigat na nga ng everest, heavyweights pa yung mga nag test ng 0-100 hihihihi.

hahahaha oo nga eh

[HUMABOL KA]

Walangya....ambigat na nga ng everest, heavyweights pa yung mga nag test ng 0-100 hihihihi.

..........................................

[Airbus380]

Mu-x 2.5 vs montero 2.5 vs fortuner 2.5 compared
https://youtu.be/Dn-j8p0ne6Y

[R0TC1V]

Ano kaya't lagyan ng 3.0 emblem at chrome spoiler un 2.5?

[x-wind]

Sa mga nag additional for tint mag kano additional nyo for front windshield?

[wonderloo]

They were asking for 2100 sa isuzu cavite for a full front tint. I declined. Pagawa ko nalang sa iba.

[Ry_Tower]

Ano kaya't lagyan ng 3.0 emblem at chrome spoiler un 2.5?

Huwag sir. Baduy yan.

Sent from my LG-H818 using Tapatalk

[mesami]

DON’T BIGGER ENGINES USE MORE FUEL?

A common misconception is that a bigger engine means you are using more fuel. In fact, for MU-X, the opposite is true. The larger 3.0L engine capacity means the MU-X can generate more power when you need it, without over-stressing the engine. This makes the MU-X more fuel efficient as well as more reliable.

[mesami]

True or False?

[PJ Sinohin]

Hindi pa kasi nila na-drive...brochure buyers sila kaya puro satsat. Yung nagsasabing underpower, usually sila din yung wala naman pambili. 😹😹😹

boom
ok lang na underpowered, hindi naman stressed ang makina kaya tumatagaaaaaal!