As per experience and observation between our 3.2. Bt-50 and 2.2 xlt AT ranger.... ( don't mean to contra duramax observation)
Medyo matipid ng konti ang 3.2 Mazda over our ranger on hi-ways. Made some trips out of town (Bicol) trips with the two vehicle. Our consumption are as follows:
* bt-50 ave 12.8kms/L while the ranger only gave us 10.6kms/L.
*was not able to compare it in city driving, Kasi don't use them much in city. More convenient to use our small cars :-)
Things to consider;
Maybe because mas malaki machine bt-50 kaya madali mag accelerate and d masyado babad sa low gears.
Tires of bt-50 is 17 with nitto terra grappler while ranger has 20 shoes.



Reply With Quote
