Results 41 to 50 of 266
-
July 9th, 2003 07:05 PM #41
zanch:: i'll sell it for 300 bucks. half the price of bnew. mga 80% pa lang of the cleaner and oil yung nagamit ko.
mojako:: i got my finer filter from RATS 4X4 in alabang
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Posts
- 124
-
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2002
- Posts
- 194
July 11th, 2003 09:08 PM #44happy_gilmore,
I had mine installed by Karplus in Makati, costs me Php 2,200 all in (simota kit plus labor included).
-
Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Posts
- 3
July 29th, 2003 07:44 PM #45hi my first post here
based on the replies on this thread i have to choose between k&N or simota
Originally posted by Karding
yan na nga ba ang sinasabi ko, gaya ng post ni happy_gilmore. SYMBIOTIC RELATIONSHIP between I/H/E. Intake alone wont benefit you much. Kailangan may ka-akibat na performance mods.
I means intake right guys?
-
-
July 30th, 2003 12:48 AM #47
uhmm...installing those aftermarket filters voids the car's warranty right?
or would one just replace back the stock filter when the time to have the car undergo PMS para "under warranty" pa rin...
-
July 30th, 2003 12:50 AM #48
yup, it voids your warranty... dunno kung di nila malalaman kung binalik mo sa stock pag PMS mo na... pero hassle yun eh!
-
July 30th, 2003 07:16 AM #49
it would void your warranty ONLY if the main cause of the engine failure will be PROVEN to be the added mods you did in your car. I've had I/H/E and when my radiator broke, the dealership replaced it with no question. Same goes with my brake master cylinder, no questions asked. Now, if you replaced your springs to make ur ride lower, then your OEM shocks leaked, you know better not to ask for a warranty :lol:
-
August 1st, 2003 03:05 PM #50
ok, how about this comparo. which would make the engine breathe easier (considering m looking more for fuel efficiency and less of the added performance, if any). it's for a 2002 2.0L Camry AT btw.
1. K&N drop-in filter
2. K&N cone type filter with stainless steel tube
i would think hands down in terms of air taken in, the cone type would be the more free flowing alternative. however, what if we factor in the temp. of air that the cone type with stainless steel tube would be taking in vs. that of the stock plastic intake? would it be that much hotter thus negating the air intake advantage with hotter air? or, whether or not it is hotter, will the effect still be noticeable?
thanks.
Na lock ang Gcash ko, need verification pa and kasama sa list nila ang philsys ID paper, but when I...
National ID Law