Mazda CX-5 2.5l AWD vs Subaru Forester XT

**hoover** · June 18th, 2013 05:27 PM

Hi, I've been reading most of the comparisons here but I still just had to start my own topic.

I am very much interested in both the cx5 and the forester. Both have their own pros and cons and I'm willing to adapt to either PROVIDED the RELIABILITY is there.

My main concern is therefore their reliability. I currently own a Pajero and I love it. It's a gas model, but I still like it because there are no hidden defects. Unlike when I had an 03 trooper, I hated the experience since I got the lemon. I got the unit which was releasing black, foul smelling smoke even after tuneups.

Which one has a more reliable track record? Better fit and finish?

Ummm... Since we're at it, let me know what your preference is regardless of the reliability factor and why 😄. Thanks!

**hoover** · June 18th, 2013 05:36 PM

Naging Forester vs Fortuner na kasi yung isang thread, wanted sana to confine discussions to the CX and the Forester.

**c_cube** · July 15th, 2013 11:17 PM

Im with the same dilemma as the TS

CX5 or Forester XT both AWD
1.685M vs. 1.868M

i know both have pros and cons but im hoping for your inputs guys and gals..

TIA

**leodawesome** · July 15th, 2013 11:23 PM

As per SA told me, yung Yojin3 Total care ng mazda covered daw ultimo change oils. Yun nga lang 60k or 3 yrs whichever comes first. Parang ndi justified yung 150-200k price premium nya. But hell, its a mazda. If I were you, I'd get the newer engine technology in mazda.

**Egan101** · July 16th, 2013 12:39 AM

Both models are quite new since they were just recently introduced in the world market. Reliability questions on both models can only be answered 2-4 years from now after they have been used considerably by their buyers. At the mean time, it's a matter of how good the local dealers (Berjaya for Mazda and MotorImage for Subaru) will be able to service both models.

The new Forester topped the most recent crash tests in the US among compact utility vehicles. The Forester XT is rated among the best in terms of its performance with its powerful 2.0L turbo engine and its quick stride coupled with Subaru's proven AWD capability. On the other hand, the CX5 topped the comparison among the non-turbo compact SUV' (CRV, RAV4, Forester NA, etc).

Please refer below to local articles regarding both cars.

************ - Philippine Car News, Test Drives, and Prices: Review: 2013 Subaru Forester XT

************ - Philippine Car News, Test Drives, and Prices: First Drive: 2013 Mazda CX-5 AWD Sport and Mazda6

The author (Ulysses Ang) did mention these words when asked which is the better CUV, "It depends on what you're after. It would be very wrong to compare the Forester XT to the CX-5 AWD Sport even if the prices are very close already. The XT still feels like the sports car of the crossover world, while the CX-5 is more of a sports sedan. If I had the money, I'd still get the XT...I'm kinda biased towards the turbo performance as well as the Subaru tech (it's AWD is still better than the one in the CX-5). That said, the CX-5 is not a bad choice as well."

**c_cube** · July 16th, 2013 09:38 AM

thanks for the links *egan

im really thorn between the 2..

Just having second thoughts because of the 200K price difference, is it worth the extra squeeze?

**JohnM** · July 16th, 2013 09:54 AM

Originally Posted by c_cube

Just having second thoughts because of the 200K price difference, is it worth the extra squeeze?

I'm biased towards the Mazda for roads with lots of curves. Nothing beats the kick of a turbo though

**Ponkan** · July 16th, 2013 11:56 AM

sa pormahan parang mas maganda un CX5 saka bagong tech sympre Skyactive, para kasing mas maganda un porma nun older version ng XT, pero sympre performance mas lamang un may Turbo, best nyan sir test drive both

**foresterx** · July 16th, 2013 11:59 AM

Originally Posted by c_cube

thanks for the links *egan

im really thorn between the 2..

Just having second thoughts because of the 200K price difference, is it worth the extra squeeze?

depends on what you want. if you want raw power and performance none of the XT's competitors can compete against it. i haven't driven the cx-5 awd but from what i've read and heard the cx-5 awd is more comfortable and has better fc compared to the XT. i'd be happy with any of the 2, those are my top choices if i was in the market for a small suv, i'd rather own a cx-5 or xt than a rav4, tucson or cr-v.

**tr1ck5h07** · July 16th, 2013 12:12 PM

Those are 2 excellent choices. I'd suggest listing all the pros and cons of both vehicles and assigning a weight or priority based on your needs.

Good luck!

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4 Beta