Pag FC , sure winner ang diesel so Accent ang panalo.
For your other criteria, City ang panalo IMO.
But overall, I'd go for the City or like what XTO recommended, Vios para bagong bago![]()
Pag FC , sure winner ang diesel so Accent ang panalo.
For your other criteria, City ang panalo IMO.
But overall, I'd go for the City or like what XTO recommended, Vios para bagong bago![]()
biased ako sa Honda City since I chose this over other sub-compact cars lately
For me it's accent. I am a CRDI fan especially hyundai and kia. They got all the jiuce you need. Plus the fuel savings that the TS is looking for. Whether fully loaded or driving it alone. Just the fun of driving that crdi engine is enough for me to choose this against any competitors. Di bale na wala masyadong toys sa loob as long as powerful and economical naman ito. Sa mga toys you could always install aftermarket toys.
I suggest you test drive the 2 cars and for sure if you are hungry for power and speed hindi ka na magiisip pa. Accent ka na.
boss sorry to disagree, dami ako nakikita kia picanto, hyundai eon, and other small engine cars na umaakyat ng baguio. i have a vios 1.3 lang sya pero di naman ako binitin sa tagaytay, i think tamang driving habit at ika nga nila "know your car well".
honda city and accent are both good cars, IMHO.
Yes I have the manual version....Hindi sya matagtag and hindi sya maingay....
My 2nd car is a 2007 Lancer 1.6.. and ayaw ko ng i drive to..Si misis na lang nag dadrive nito... Iba talaga ang Accent.. Power and Fuel efficiency...
Test drive both.. Maganda din ang City, actually yan ang gustong ipalit ni Misis sa Lancer...Pero ako.. Accent all the way.. he he he
vios naman pala sa iyo e hindi honda. iba po ang makina ng toyota sa honda. honda engines are high revving, develops peak torque at very high rpm. toyota engines have peak torque at low to medium rpms, thereby delivering better climbing ability and better city traffic experience.
sabi mo nga know your car well. but you don't know the honda city do you? i have driven 2 hondas (test drove the city and civic) and in both cases i found the engines anemic and torque-less. mas malakas pa hatak ng old 1.3 liter mazda 323 ko nuon kesa sa 1.8 liter honda civic e.
here's the latest comparo between vios and city from topgear >>>
Sedan options: Honda City vs Toyota Vios - Wrong Car/Right Car Online
Honda City 1.3 user ako sir, so far wala naman problema ung auto. FC ko naglalaro sa 12-13KM per liter (City driving) 16-17KM per liter (Highway drving). Ung cabin space at trunk space talagang malaki if icocompare niyo to other subcompact sa market. Dinala namin sa Baguio 5 pax then puno ung trunk(as in puno) hindi naman bitin ung hatak sa Kennon Rd. as long na may bwelo.
Between Honda City/Hyundai Accent, kung plano niyo i keep ung auto for 8-10 years, Honda City nalang, mas mura maintenance and parts ng gasoline engine if icocompare niyo sa diesel engine, un nga lang mas mura naman ang diesel ng 10 pesos per liter. If plan niyo naman i keep ung auto for about 5 years Hyundai Accent na sir![]()
Thinking reliability and durability you will never go wrong with honda. Had some durability issues with new hyundai ownership. They are getting there yesbit not quite at par with the japs.
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk 2
Thank you mga Sir sa lahat ng sinabi nyo.
Although lalo ako naguluhan kung ano tlga ang pipiliin ko, at least may idea nko kung ano pro's n con's ng bawat auto. By the way I'm a new driver lang din kase. Do you think I start with low torque cars e.g Honda City 1.3S para iwas sa temptation ng pagiging speed devil?![]()
For me, di naman ako nabibitin kapag magooovertake.Di naman din ako speed maniac kaya siguro di ko napapansin sir ung sinasabi na bitin ung hatak. (BTW manual tranny pala ung City ko) Pero kung icocompare mo siya sa Accent CRDi, lamang po talaga Accent since CRDi makina nun. Un kasi advantage ng diesel engine.
Eto pala sir, review ni sir Niky sa Honda City.
Review: Honda City 1.5 EL AT - Drives
Ahh ganon ba idol, eh napakaexage naman ng case mo eh na wala kang nakikitang honda city na umakaakyat ng baguio eh ako nga nakakakita ng cd5, eon and etc. Na mas maliit engine sa city na madalas umakyat ng baguio. So sa tingin ko hindi paper detail ang sagot sa disagreement ko sayo, pakicorrect na alng na honda city has enough torque at high rpm. Madami ka palang honda na sasakyan dagdagan mo pa.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Last edited by brainmafia_310; June 12th, 2013 at 04:53 AM.
I would pick the Honda City, my experience with Honda is that prices of parts or servicing is reasonable. In the long run it may be easier and cheaper to get maintenance/repairs done.
in my opinion, i can say the same with my toyota.. heh heh. each to his own..
koreans? none of my acquaintances who own koreans, have good words to describe their service.. but that's just them..
my last experience with koreans was in 2005, and i do not remember unhappy thoughts with them then.
Last edited by dr. d; June 12th, 2013 at 01:47 PM.
My dad was lent a City 1.3 AT for a week
lets just say he was completely underwhelmed by its performance in the highway (the fastest they got it was 140 ish.... downhill in actex)
I tried it myself, it wasnt so bad... But if you are used to powerful suvs or bigger engined sedans, you will be disappointed
But forget what i just said, its your first car, reliability and safety are paramount
If you decide to bring it to Tagaytay, just don't overtake much, you will probably not lose more than 20 minutes on the trip
para sakin, city is my pick. crdi engine is great but having an experience with a starex crdi... When the crdi broke down, it would cost an arm and a leg.
The car was a 2009, it was a company fleet car so it may have not been well taken care of, and that was driven in a fairly busy highway so gaps arent big
In two lane highways we tend to slow down when passing, you never know when they might change lane, actex only has 2 lanes
small 1.3 cars tend to struggle above 150,
to OP
everything I said is irrelevant, the city ir a vios are very good cars in all guises