COMPARO: Mid-size 4x2 AT Diesel SUV (Mu-X, TBZ, Montero, Fortuner, Everest, Sta Fe...

[jut703]

YTD 2014 Jan-Sept
Fortuner 11xxx
Montero 106xx
Everest 24xx
TBz 22xx
Mux 1xxx (after 2 months)
Isuzu 2015 MUX target is 8000+units

Palink ng source bro. Interested to know the sales of other segments too.


Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

[StockEngine]

Sent you the link. Everest numbers are higher coz of an october update

[StockEngine]

two reviews of the Chevy TBZ LTX 4x2 indicates 7.xkm/L Fuel consumption in the city. POWER in traffic

Review: 2014 Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.8 4x2 A/T | ************ - Philippine Car News, Car Reviews, Auto Features, and Car Prices

7.35 km/L in the city

2014 Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.8L 4x2 LTX - Honest Car Reviews Philippines

logged about just over 7 km/liter (sugar coated version: just under 8km/l) in moderate to heavy city traffic

[ano727]

Sent you the link. Everest numbers are higher coz of an october update

Pa-send din ng source link bro. Thanks a lot.

[ano727]

Among these SUVs, which one will be most fuel efficient at 100% city driving na laging may traffic?

I only know Montero based on my experience, 7km per liter pag bumper to bumper city traffic.

How about the other cars here?

Thanks!

[jmpet626]

Getting 9km per liter pag heavy traffic sa santa fe gen 2 crdi.

[niky]

MU-X 4x2 LS-M is actually pretty good, though I haven't tried the 4x2 LS-A yet. The 4x4 is just okay.

[jut703]

I bet the upcoming Everest will be thrifty.

Lowest I've ever got with my Ranger is 8 km/L and that's on pure EDSA rush hour driving. My overall average over 20,000 km is 10 km/L. This is with a 2.2 MT that's always driven hard.

[victorevolution]

two reviews of the Chevy TBZ LTX 4x2 indicates 7.xkm/L Fuel consumption in the city. POWER in traffic

Review: 2014 Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.8 4x2 A/T | ************ - Philippine Car News, Car Reviews, Auto Features, and Car Prices


2014 Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.8L 4x2 LTX - Honest Car Reviews Philippines

tbz lt at. 4x2 2.8 2014 owner here... HA? based on my experience from day one we bought the vehicle using full tank method my km per liter is 10km per liter- traversing intramuros-taft-lasalle-pasay-(heavy traffic) then slex to alabang(driven hard but not above the speed limit even when over taking)- back and forth, sometimes it even reached 11km per liter(using seaoil) - sa computer nga 12 eh km per liter.

also own 2014 2.8 at ltz 4x4 - ito ang 7 km per liter minsan pa nga 6 eh pero no suprise it's heavier and ala pang one month unike sa 4x2 na 5 months na- traversing the same route.

[machinepistol]

I get 7.5 to 8.3 km per liter in heavy traffic city driving with my TB LTZ.

[ano727]

What levels of discount are offered now especially for those ageing models (Fortuner, Montero, outgoing Everest, etc)?

[dct]

100+k for montero and everest. Maliit lang sa fortuner afaik

[raiden69]

100+k for montero and everest. Maliit lang sa fortuner afaik

that is correct, Fort daw 70K, TB wala raw. kung wala ang TB at twin nya ang MUX, malamang maghahati lang sila sa market share nilang dalawa.

[raiden69]

here is my opinion:

1. If you are looking for fuel efficiency with good price, go for the MU X. But definitely, the trade off is design.
2. If you are looking for power, go for the Trailblazer. It does not have the ammenities for the low price SUV segment.
3. If you are looking for good resale value, go for the Fortuner. It has neither a low price nor a fuel efficient SUV.
4. If you are looking for both low price and next fuel efficient, go for the Montero. It is next to Fortuner on resale value and next to MU X for Fuel Efficiency.
5. If you are looking for the luxury, go for the Sta Fe. It is quite expensive for this SUV.
6. Everest? Well, let's wait next year.....

[JR318]

here is my opinion:

1. If you are looking for fuel efficiency with good price, go for the MU X. But definitely, the trade off is design.
2. If you are looking for power, go for the Trailblazer. It does not have the ammenities for the low price SUV segment.
3. If you are looking for good resale value, go for the Fortuner. It has neither a low price nor a fuel efficient SUV.
4. If you are looking for both low price and next fuel efficient, go for the Montero. It is next to Fortuner on resale value and next to MU X for Fuel Efficiency.
5. If you are looking for the luxury, go for the Sta Fe. It is quite expensive for this SUV.
6. Everest? Well, let's wait next year.....

You are ABSOLUTELY RIGHT...my husband tried to convince me to choose Mu x or trailblazer but i keep on insisting Sta fe...and now we're happily driving our SF3.

Fuel efficiency of sf3 di naman nalalayo sa mu x.

[dct]

here is my opinion:

1. If you are looking for fuel efficiency with good price, go for the MU X. But definitely, the trade off is design.
2. If you are looking for power, go for the Trailblazer. It does not have the ammenities for the low price SUV segment.
3. If you are looking for good resale value, go for the Fortuner. It has neither a low price nor a fuel efficient SUV.
4. If you are looking for both low price and next fuel efficient, go for the Montero. It is next to Fortuner on resale value and next to MU X for Fuel Efficiency.
5. If you are looking for the luxury, go for the Sta Fe. It is quite expensive for this SUV.
6. Everest? Well, let's wait next year.....

I disagree with the power. I'll give it to sta fe. Sa paper specs 3 hp lang agwat nila ng TB. Pero napakagaan naman kaya ang bilis umarangkada. Smoother engine rin at hindi maingay gaya sa TB

Anyway, parang mali rin na i-compare sila kasi puro ladder frame ang topic. Monocoque naman ang sta fe

[Djerms]

Sta fe okay lang kung sa city and highway lang. Pero kung off beaten track, patay na...weak suspension.

[dct]

Sta fe okay lang kung sa city and highway lang. Pero kung off beaten track, patay na...weak suspension.

Ayun lang. Hehe. At kung ang 3rd row ng mga MS, fort, TB ay masikip, sa sta fe ay sobrang sikip

[soul12]

here is my opinion:

1. If you are looking for fuel efficiency with good price, go for the MU X. But definitely, the trade off is design.
2. If you are looking for power, go for the Trailblazer. It does not have the ammenities for the low price SUV segment.
3. If you are looking for good resale value, go for the Fortuner. It has neither a low price nor a fuel efficient SUV.
4. If you are looking for both low price and next fuel efficient, go for the Montero. It is next to Fortuner on resale value and next to MU X for Fuel Efficiency.
5. If you are looking for the luxury, go for the Sta Fe. It is quite expensive for this SUV.
6. Everest? Well, let's wait next year.....

How about Sorento, any comment?

[victorevolution]

here is my opinion:

1. If you are looking for fuel efficiency with good price, go for the MU X. But definitely, the trade off is design.
2. If you are looking for power, go for the Trailblazer. It does not have the ammenities for the low price SUV segment.
3. If you are looking for good resale value, go for the Fortuner. It has neither a low price nor a fuel efficient SUV.
4. If you are looking for both low price and next fuel efficient, go for the Montero. It is next to Fortuner on resale value and next to MU X for Fuel Efficiency.
5. If you are looking for the luxury, go for the Sta Fe. It is quite expensive for this SUV.
6. Everest? Well, let's wait next year.....

according to the studies made by doe(department of energy yes doe) the most gas-diesel guzzling vehicle is the montero gls 4x2(vgt consumes more) followed by the suzuki apv.(top of the list is apv- petrol feed, montero-diesel feed)

the most fuel efficient vehicle is the suzuki celerio(forgot the diesel)

real world test, philippine conditions. plying the edsa and metro manila route done in december- forgot the year


fortunner(non vnt), everest and alterra where at the middle.

so where did you get your statistical data to arrive in such a conclusion???

we own a montero and an apv hence we can compare it with other vehicles- suprisingly enough the studied made by the doe is accurate

5-7 km/l ang montero(inclung heavy traffic) doe- report is 5-6