New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 169
  1. Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    944
    #41
    How about if you will compare these cars not as driver but as second row passenger, how will you rank or describe each one.

    Please share your personal experiences.

    Thanks again to those who have already shared thus far.

  2. Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6,235
    #42
    Our 2011 Santa Fe has a generous 2nd row. No problems with headroom since there are no ceiling mounted air vents. Legroom is good though by no means limousine-like. The leather seems durable and not very prone to scratches. I would've appreciated softer cushioning though.

    Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

  3. Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,513
    #43
    The trailblazer is really spacious on the 2nd row..nakaka dekwarto pa ako..

  4. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,702
    #44
    In terms of size, the TBZ and MU-X are tops (in the ladder-frame class).

    The Santa Fe, on the other hand... runaway leader in terms of ride comfort in the back row. Not as truckish as the MU-X and TBZ.

    The Montero's ride is, if I recall right, still smoother than the TBZ, but the rear seat is narrow and having the wheel well intrude into the seat back sucks.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

  5. Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    944
    #45
    Quote Originally Posted by niky View Post
    The Santa Fe, on the other hand... runaway leader in terms of ride comfort in the back row. Not as truckish as the MU-X and TBZ.
    Thanks niky. Would you say the same for Santa Fe's platform twin Sorento in terms of ride comfort?

  6. Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6,235
    #46
    I've a friend who drives a 5 seater 2011 Sorento 4x2 CRDi. I personally find it bouncier than our Santa Fe. Road imperfections are quite pronounced.

    Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

  7. Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    944
    #47
    Quote Originally Posted by GTi View Post
    I've a friend who drives a 5 seater 2011 Sorento 4x2 CRDi. I personally find it bouncier than our Santa Fe. Road imperfections are quite pronounced.

    Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
    Great! Good to know. Thanks GTi.

  8. Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,219
    #48
    Quote Originally Posted by niky View Post
    In terms of size, the TBZ and MU-X are tops (in the ladder-frame class).

    The Santa Fe, on the other hand... runaway leader in terms of ride comfort in the back row. Not as truckish as the MU-X and TBZ.

    The Montero's ride is, if I recall right, still smoother than the TBZ, but the rear seat is narrow and having the wheel well intrude into the seat back sucks.
    and thats why the NVH of rear wheels of montero is comparable to owner type jeep... worst, you can loudly hear even the small splash of water.

  9. Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,219
    #49
    on drag race for these SUVS who do you think will win? 0-100, 100-140, 140-170, 170-200?

  10. Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,513
    #50
    Quote Originally Posted by 3GEMS View Post
    on drag race for these SUVS who do you think will win? 0-100, 100-140, 140-170, 170-200?
    100-170kph
    sa tingin ko 1st ang sta fe because it is lighter
    2nd ang trail blazer 2.8..

    hula ko lang yan ha...

    maganda siguro masubukan... any volunteers.. he.he..

  11. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    4,456
    #51
    How about reliability?

  12. Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    4,447
    #52
    Quote Originally Posted by 3GEMS View Post
    on drag race for these SUVS who do you think will win? 0-100, 100-140, 140-170, 170-200?
    Sta fe/sorento more likely. Very powerful engine and light body

  13. Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    397
    #53
    Yiz. The speed goes to korean cars. However some of them are front drives. scary for me.

  14. Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6,235
    #54
    A stock Montero VGT is very sluggish off the line (based off experience with the Strada GLS-V, seconded by Montero GLS-V owners). It only starts accelerating in earnest once it hits 2k rpm from which it delivers excellent midrange acceleration which just keeps going before losing steam at around 170-180.

    I haven't had the opportunity to "properly" thrash our Santa Fe yet. But from what I've experienced, it accelerates hard almost immediately off the line exhibiting how a variable geometry turbo is really supposed to work. I personally find the 4D56 VGT to have more "brutal" midrange punch as compared to the Santa Fe's more linear acceleration.

    Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

  15. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    6,385
    #55
    Quote Originally Posted by GTi View Post
    I've a friend who drives a 5 seater 2011 Sorento 4x2 CRDi. I personally find it bouncier than our Santa Fe. Road imperfections are quite pronounced. Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
    Di naman kaya overinflated tires?

  16. Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6,235
    #56
    Quote Originally Posted by IMm29 View Post
    Di naman kaya overinflated tires?
    I've thought of that too. Might be the case. Can't ask him though. My friend knows next to nothing about cars except driving them, and that is their family "coding vehicle" . The car's got 17s as compared to our SF's 18s which, theoretically, should give it an advantage in terms of ride comfort. We inflate to 35psi on all corners, by the way.

    Compared to modern ladder frame SUVs, I personally don't find our SF THAT much more comfortable as their different platform types might suggest, though it is noticeably less bouncy.

    Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

  17. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,702
    #57
    Quote Originally Posted by 3GEMS View Post
    on drag race for these SUVS who do you think will win? 0-100, 100-140, 140-170, 170-200?
    1. Trailblazer 4x2/Sorento 5 seater /Santa Fe/Montero Sport V6 4x2 >>>> Trailblazer 4x4 > Montero Sport >>> everything else.

    Of the four, the Sorento and Santa Fe have the potential to hit 100 under 9 seconds... but the new Santa Fe feels slower and heavier.

    Good luck finding the five people in the country who actually bought a V6 Montero Sport to test it out.

    2. Sorento / Santa Fe > Trailblazer >>>> everything else.

    3. Same.

    4. Pointless. All of these cars have speed limiters. And drag racing on the streets is illegal, don'cha know.

    Quote Originally Posted by frostmourn View Post
    Yiz. The speed goes to korean cars. However some of them are front drives. scary for me.
    Front-wheel drive is much, much, much safer at highway speeds than rear wheel drive. Any deflection of the direction of travel due to hydroplaning (over the puddles that form on the fast lane at the SLEX during heavy rains) is easy to control... just have a firm grip on the wheel. In a rear wheel drive car, if you start hydroplaning when the car is under power, the momentary imbalance of torque at the rear axle will cause the rear end to "step out" (ergo - drift)... which you need to counter after the fact with a quick application of countersteer. If you lift off the gas or hit the brakes in panic, it will simply make the slide worse.

    Quote Originally Posted by Djerms View Post
    How about reliability?
    Ikaw na sumagot diyan in five years.
    Last edited by niky; October 27th, 2014 at 09:04 AM.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

  18. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #58
    Quote Originally Posted by niky View Post
    Good luck finding the five people in the country who actually bought a V6 Montero Sport to test it out.
    Is it true? Only 5 people bought the V6 Montero Sport petrol model? Is this the Montero Sport GLS SE model?

  19. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,314
    #59
    Quote Originally Posted by Egan101 View Post
    Is it true? Only 5 people bought the V6 Montero Sport petrol model? Is this the Montero Sport GLS SE model?
    This was the 3.0 V6 lifted from the Outlander that made 200 hp, released sometime in 2012 for about 1.4M.

    It was Mitsubishi's way of countering the 2.7G Fortuner. Unfortunately, the phrase "3.0 V6" scared away people more than it enticed them 😂


    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

  20. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,702
    #60
    Quote Originally Posted by Egan101 View Post
    Is it true? Only 5 people bought the V6 Montero Sport petrol model? Is this the Montero Sport GLS SE model?
    I could be wrong... it could be less.

    But seriously... who's going to buy a V6 Montero Sport? With the soft suspension and very slow steering, it's not a sports car... so why would you want all that gas guzzling power? Especially when the 2.5 is already quicker than most people need?

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

COMPARO: Mid-size 4x2 AT Diesel SUV (Mu-X, TBZ, Montero, Fortuner, Everest, Sta Fe...