New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Results 1 to 20 of 82

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    53
    #1
    Quote Originally Posted by minicarph View Post
    mUx PMS at 1.5T km - P3500
    Mux PMS at 5k - ganun din daw pag balik ko

    Ranger PMS at 5k - almost 9k ata

    So san diff? Sa oil. ford only run fully synthetic, while Isuzu use regular isuzu oil

    Dyan talo ng Isuzu ang Ford sa oil lang, others oil filter, air filter siguro difference of P300 mas mahal Ford

    In terms of FC, I average 9.2km/liter on the Wildtrak while 12.3km/liter on the bluepower. Considering that ford uses FA oil mas matipid pa din regular oil ng Isuzu. The figures I posted are from my computer trip meter. I dont bother manual compute na since kaya nga diesel na para wala na feel feel ba para ka naka - taxi metro sa fc lol

    Ang problema ko ngaun eh yun Ford Explorer ko, kasi average of 35km / 100L , that's like 3km/liter. Tsk tsk eh kasi naman sa gulong sinalpakan ko ng stock tires ng FJ Cruiser, nagka 2 inch lift ako sa rubber pa lang, Dati kasi average ako ng 16km/100L or roughly 6km/liter sa stock tires.

    But I tell you these diesels today no match talaga sa Ford V6 even of yesteryears in terms of arangkadahan .

    -----

    In terms of maintenance outside warranty / casa, Ford is not expensive. In. fact mas expensive pa nga Honda . my Ford Explorer eddie bauer is one of the cheapest maintenance cars ko , tipong 3k/year or every 10Tkm .

    The one that thing I noticed is even more than 10 years ago, solid ang suspension design ng mga Ford. Solid na comfy pa. Unlike with the Japs, solid nga tagtag naman .

    Both my ranger and explorer, sarap sumakay and hindi takot salubak
    Thanks Bro for sharing your thoughts. At least di biased kc you highlighted both the good and the bad for each. I believe sa Fuel Consumption nararamdaman un configuration ng MUX sa makina nila kc understressed cya. 2.5 cya pero it has lower HP than everest na lower displacement at 2.2. Eto din daw according to ISUZU is their way to prolong engine life. Try reading B10 certification ng ISUZU engine for MUX...

  2. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,624
    #2
    Quote Originally Posted by bolog View Post
    Thanks Bro for sharing your thoughts. At least di biased kc you highlighted both the good and the bad for each. I believe sa Fuel Consumption nararamdaman un configuration ng MUX sa makina nila kc understressed cya. 2.5 cya pero it has lower HP than everest na lower displacement at 2.2. Eto din daw according to ISUZU is their way to prolong engine life. Try reading B10 certification ng ISUZU engine for MUX...
    stress? nanaman? di na uso yan sa new crdi technology

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

  3. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #3
    Quote Originally Posted by StockEngine View Post
    stress? nanaman? di na uso yan sa new crdi technology

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
    Newer engines are getting lower displacements yet they produce more output.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Tags for this Thread

4x2 MUX or 4x2 Everest