New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    552
    #1
    Hi need you opinion and kung sino na naka try. Size is 205 70 R15 for my Crosswind.

    Ano ang mas durable and better ride comfort? MIchelin XM2 or Goodyear HP AW?


    I already checked the price and its almost the same.


    Thank you

  2. Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    552
    #2
    By the way gamit ko now Goodyear Fortera. Used it for 5years. Phase out na daw and I think the goodyear HP AW is the replacement kasi it looks the same.

  3. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    17,338
    #3
    I also liked the Forteras before so we used Wrangler HP on a Ford Escape. So far so good but its only a few weeks old to date.

  4. Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    552
    #4
    I'm also satisfied with the fortera, taka nga ako bakit phase out ng good year. in terms of ride comfort and durabiltiy.

    if yung michelin XM2 mas matagal mapudpod puedeng replacement. pero parang pang light duty lang siya thats why

    I need insights kung sino na nakagamit.


    thanks

  5. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,702
    #5
    Are XM2s rated for truck use?

    I'd rather get HPAWs. Better performance. I tried them out at the Goodyear launch, and the performance was pretty darn good. Not as good, mind you, as Advan STs, but really good for a truck tire. XM2s are fuel savers, which sacrifice some grip for fuel economy... not a big deal, since the Crosswind is not a performance vehicle, but I've never been comfortable with the braking abilities of the Michelin Energy series (and I've had the XM1s on one of my vehicles) whereas the HP AWs have excellent braking grip.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

  6. Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    25,276
    #6
    Quote Originally Posted by niky View Post
    Are XM2s rated for truck use?

    I'd rather get HPAWs. Better performance. I tried them out at the Goodyear launch, and the performance was pretty darn good. Not as good, mind you, as Advan STs, but really good for a truck tire. XM2s are fuel savers, which sacrifice some grip for fuel economy... not a big deal, since the Crosswind is not a performance vehicle, but I've never been comfortable with the braking abilities of the Michelin Energy series (and I've had the XM1s on one of my vehicles) whereas the HP AWs have excellent braking grip.
    Yes there is a an issue with grip and braking performance of energy conserving tires. Since a crosswind is already economical, get the HP AW's na lang TS.
    Fasten your seatbelt! Or else... Driven To Thrill!

  7. Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    8
    #7
    sir, how about bridgetone dueler 684, it has also 205/70r15

  8. Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    552
    #8
    Okay so the issue is the braking capabilities of the XM2, they market XM2 as a fuel saver.

    for me priority also is the braking ability of the tire , parang mas light duty itong XM2 for the crosswind.


    So your saying that a better tire is the ADVAN ST, yokohama ito di ba? from what I've observed from my friends vehicles
    and also from their feedbacks mas mabilis daw mapudpod ang yokohama. Is this true?

  9. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    17,338
    #9
    Quote Originally Posted by rhy_84 View Post
    sir, how about bridgetone dueler 684, it has also 205/70r15
    The Bridgestone HTs have usually been crap per my experience (poor wet performance, poor threadwear and we blew up two on our Land Cruiser under normal circumstances).

    Aside from the Goodyear HTs, i'd also recommend the Yokohoma Geolandars (and its made locally at Clark so you support our local industry).

  10. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,702
    #10
    Advan STs will definitely wear out faster than your typical Dueler HT or similar tires. Performance tires always do. And they're available in medium and low-profile only, I only included them for reference.

    HP AWs aren't straight performance tires, they're comfort touring, but with an extra edge of grip and proven better braking performance than the Dueler HTs (we tested this when they launched the tire). Like Vinj, I hate the HTs, have had them on a couple of vehicles and I've had nothing but bad experiences with them.

    I replaced the HTs on the CR-V with Kumho Ecsta SPX, but those are like Advan STs... lots of grip, tread wear not quite as good as an HT tire, and tire noise pretty bad, especially once they start wearing down. On the Crosswind, we replaced the HTs with Kumho SPTs, which have good tread wear, quieter running and life that seems similar to the HTs.

    If I had the money or the source, I would have gone for the HP AWs instead of the Ecsta SPX, but I like my SPTs. They're sufficient for my needs on the Crosswind and pretty cheap.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

  11. Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    7,119
    #11
    You might want to look at the Pirelli P4's, they're pretty cheap compared to the xm-2's. Tread looks very grippy.

  12. Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    552
    #12
    Might be that Pirelli's might not be as durable as tires built for hot climates. Maybe if budget problems I'll try kumho APT instead

    of goodyear HP Aw or XM2.

  13. Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,605
    #13
    I've used the XM1 on a minivan. Inflated with nitrogen. One blew out, side wall failed, at about 3 years and 30,000 kms. My dad's E150 also had 2 Michellins blow. So I'm wary of that brand.

    No experience with the Good Year HP. But mos of our trucks (Elf aand Canters) use good yer. They last about 2 years. Better than the 1 year we used to get with Gagha. My city uses good year nct3, the stock tire, nothing great. But so far no problems after 2.5 years and 31,000 kms. Braking can be a lot better though.

  14. Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    77
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by niky View Post
    HP AWs aren't straight performance tires, they're comfort touring, but with an extra edge of grip and proven better braking performance than the Dueler HTs (we tested this when they launched the tire). Like Vinj, I hate the HTs, have had them on a couple of vehicles and I've had nothing but bad experiences with them.

    I replaced the HTs on the CR-V with Kumho Ecsta SPX, but those are like Advan STs... lots of grip, tread wear not quite as good as an HT tire, and tire noise pretty bad, especially once they start wearing down. On the Crosswind, we replaced the HTs with Kumho SPTs, which have good tread wear, quieter running and life that seems similar to the HTs.

    If I had the money or the source, I would have gone for the HP AWs instead of the Ecsta SPX, but I like my SPTs. They're sufficient for my needs on the Crosswind and pretty cheap.
    Question: Would it be safe to install the Ecsta SPT's on a Grand Vitara? Currently running on Dueller H/T's (don't like them) and need to replace them asap. I was considering Yokohama Geolanders (either H/t or A/T) or Federal Couragia S/U's but the Ecsta's were at least P2,000 cheaper than these.

  15. Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    552
    #15
    Hi for my crosswind I'm also considering Goodyear Assurance fuel max 205 65 R15 threadlife is 580 seems better

    than Wrangler HP AW 205 70 R15 440 threadlife. Michelin Xm2 is a little expensive but might have lower threadlife.

    yun nga lang mas 65 lang yung assurance. Any insights?


    thank you

  16. Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    32
    #16
    Quote Originally Posted by anthon05 View Post
    Hi for my crosswind I'm also considering Goodyear Assurance fuel max 205 65 R15 threadlife is 580 seems better

    than Wrangler HP AW 205 70 R15 440 threadlife. Michelin Xm2 is a little expensive but might have lower threadlife.

    yun nga lang mas 65 lang yung assurance. Any insights?


    thank you
    Bro, yung Sportivo ko 2007, with Isuzu-supplied Michellin , 4 years na.And I travelled a lot in Mindanao roads!If you know what I mean. But of course since day one to date ...I pumped in Nitrogen instead of usual air on all the tires including spare. Honestly, it makes sense and very rewarding, take it from me. Good luck!

  17. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,702
    #17
    Quote Originally Posted by TomE View Post
    Question: Would it be safe to install the Ecsta SPT's on a Grand Vitara? Currently running on Dueller H/T's (don't like them) and need to replace them asap. I was considering Yokohama Geolanders (either H/t or A/T) or Federal Couragia S/U's but the Ecsta's were at least P2,000 cheaper than these.
    Check that the combined load rating of the tires equal the gross vehicle weight rating of the Grand Vitara... If it's just a little lower, just don't load the car to capacity.


    Quote Originally Posted by userfriendly View Post
    I've used the XM1 on a minivan. Inflated with nitrogen. One blew out, side wall failed, at about 3 years and 30,000 kms. My dad's E150 also had 2 Michellins blow. So I'm wary of that brand.

    No experience with the Good Year HP. But mos of our trucks (Elf aand Canters) use good yer. They last about 2 years. Better than the 1 year we used to get with Gagha. My city uses good year nct3, the stock tire, nothing great. But so far no problems after 2.5 years and 31,000 kms. Braking can be a lot better though.
    Might actually be due to not checking inflation pressures. When you use nitrogen, you're still supposed to check the pressures regularly... At least every week, considering the poor condition of the roads here.

  18. Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    77
    #18
    Quote Originally Posted by niky View Post
    Check that the combined load rating of the tires equal the gross vehicle weight rating of the Grand Vitara... If it's just a little lower, just don't load the car to capacity.
    Thanks for the reply Sir!

    Just one more question for reassurance. I googled the required load index & speed ratings of the Grand Vitara & the specs of the SPT's. I saw two different requirements for the GrandVit, one was 99T, the other said 100H. Since the SPT's ratings are 104V, am I right to assume that they meet, or even surpass, the minimum requirement?

  19. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    17,338
    #19
    Quote Originally Posted by TomE View Post
    Thanks for the reply Sir!

    Just one more question for reassurance. I googled the required load index & speed ratings of the Grand Vitara & the specs of the SPT's. I saw two different requirements for the GrandVit, one was 99T, the other said 100H. Since the SPT's ratings are 104V, am I right to assume that they meet, or even surpass, the minimum requirement?
    You are correct.

  20. Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    38
    #20
    Try Michelin Agilis instead of XM2 for your Crosswind. Rated for truck use. Higher load index, much stronger tires.

Which is better for Crosswind XTO Michelin XM2 or Goodyear Wrangler HP AW?