you can't make a player (or any employee/applicant) do that according to the law, you'll be discriminating an employee based on health which is illegal. If that pushes through (DNA testing), you'll be setting a precedent for cancer patients, HIV patients, and other long term, inheritable diseases for not getting a job or not being treated fairly by employers.
It'll NEVER happen DNA testing.
If Curry was indeed diagnosed with some sort of an in-born disease that may kill him, what if the symptoms didn't kick in until he retired and what if he performed like an all star from this year till he's 35 or something?
It simply isn't a legal thing to do and will never be allowed without A LOT of court cases to follow.
If that is true, then they should void all contracts of players who have had life threatening injuries or diseases.
What the Bulls (or Knicks) can do is to suspend his contract until he's given a clean bill of health by team doctors to suit up.
Any player can die due to illness, just ask Zo and Sean Elliot with kidney problems, but once the doctor(s) give a go signal and the player himself says yes to it. What right does the league/team have to deny him of employment?
Now if Curry's health is CONFIRMED to be life threatening, then that's another issue altogether.
DNA testing will only prove whether he's had that problem through hereditary means or not. It'll not prove the severity or his lifespan.
The issue here is that Curry doesn't want to take a test HIMSELF to confirm the situation. The league cannot FORCE him to take it as a mandatory test.
Like what the article said, the league can penalize the team for letting him play, but you can't force a player to mandatorily take a DNA test.


Reply With Quote


