Thank you sa mga inputs![]()
Sharing my WiFi story...
Through the years, I've gone through at least half a dozen different commodity and enterprise wireless routers and/or access points.... D-Link, Asus, TP-Link, Linksys, and Cisco.
We've had WiFi at home since about the early to mid 2000s, during the time when we first got our DSL connection. Back then, only my work laptop with its WiFi PCMCIA card was able to connect to it. All the rest, mostly just PCs, used a wired LAN connection.
But when the mobile revolution started (circa late 2000s to early 2010s), almost every family member started owning an Android or an iOS device. Not to mention WiFi-capable laptops. Aside from occasionally overheating or running out of RAM, necessitating a reboot, the D-Links served us well. Our WiFi client count has increased to around 15 devices.
To accommodate the increase in devices, I then bought used enterprise-grade Cisco Aironet 1230 series APs.... two of them. They worked for several years but since these are just 802.11a/b/g, newer WiFi clients couldn't take advantage of their built-in 802.11n performance. Also, even these APs were dropping connections when the number of connected clients went past 25. These were old generation APs, anyway, that were designed before mobility started to become a thing. During this time, we already have around 30+ wireless devices.
Finally, I upgraded again to Ubiquiti UniFi (UAP-AC-LR and UAP-AC-Pro) a few years back. I've never had a problem since. Even when I ventured into smart home devices and IoT earlier this year, which pushed our WiFi count in excess of 60 devices, the Ubiquitis didn't even break a sweat.
This screenshot I took just a few moments ago.
Now that we're on PLDT Fibr, it makes more sense to have a stable WiFi connection all around the house. I never liked the idea of WiFi repeaters or even powerline adapters. My philosophy now is that, if WiFi coverage is required in a certain area, it has to have an AP wired to it.
Anyway, I'm so satisfied with Ubiquiti that I'll probably run these to the ground before I replace them. And if you think they're expensive, they're actually not. If you buy them from Amazon and have somebody brought them here (if you don't have a courier), they're probably even cheaper than those "boutique" wireless routers from Asus, Netgear, Linksys, or D-Link.
if you have multi-storey structure and wish to extend wifi signal up to the upper floor you'll need not just use a higher gain antenna, but an AP with WDS (bridging capability)
most modem-routers from the service provider have internal antennas which broadast relatively weaker wifi signal. initially to boost the signal attach an AP with an external antenna to the ethernet port of service provider modem-router.
the signal from the AP can be further extended with another AP with bridging or WDS function
bridging works like a chain, each AP attached to the network links to the nearest AP to have a strong signal in every floor. when the link in between fails, the link further away from the root router lose internet connection
for a 3 storey with roof-deck set-up where the root router is located on the 3rd floor. i linked the 2nd floor to the 3rd floor then i linked the roof-deck to the 3rd floor
if the root router is located on the ground floor, ill link the 2nd floor AP to the root router, then the 3rd floor AP will be linked to the 2nd floor AP, then the roof-deck AP will be linked to the 3rd flr AP
ill always pick a bigger antenna device for high gain for a strong radio signal beause radio fade is the biggest drawback of a pure wireless network set-up
Sent from my ASUS Chromebook C202SA using Tapatalk
Last edited by kisshmet; October 1st, 2018 at 09:57 PM.
Might spring for the UAP-AC-LR. I've been trying to decide between the boutique offerings you mentioned but I'll give this brother-of-EVE thingamajig a try.
JW Summit on Lazada is selling this for PHP5790. Pretty close to the USD101 it's going for on Amazon at current exchange rates.
I have been using ubiquiti products as well. Matibay at malakas signal, medyo mahal sa umpisa at may learning curve but once set up ok na. But ang pinaka gusto sa ubiquiti is it can block youtube and facebook dito sa house :-)
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
^
Over the counter routers can also block yt and fb.
Sent from my BLL-L22 using Tapatalk
I stuck with Ubiquiti for what they are good at... WiFi.
VLANs are handled by a Cisco switch.
For UTM, I use Untangle HomePro.
That works but with each jump, you lose half the bandwidth so I wouldn't be surprised if the last link on your uppermost floor performs poorly. I only use WDS or repeaters at the ends of a network and never in between as a link to more nodes. For your setup just use powerline networking to leverage your home's wiring. It's cheaper and more reliable than wireless bridging. Less latency too!
Most over the counter router has limit on the number of websites you can block. Facebook has a lot of web address, if you register it in a router it might reach is limit. Also if you turn on block websites most over the counter routers will be very slow.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
I have blocked fb and yt on a time based access previously and noticed no decrease in router perf. You dont need to block the whole ip range though. Fb and yt resolves to different ips yes but still the name fb and yt can be used as a catch all.
But i do agree that some firmwares are not that great and may introduce slowdown once you activated a feature.
Tomatoing the router would be the next best thing.
Sent from my BLL-L22 using Tapatalk
I have a "Kids" SSID/VLAN where access schedules are enforced. Filtering is also applied, not just by using URL blocking (which is insufficient), but also by category, protocol and application.
My sons' school has a Ubiquiti router in each classroom. That's at least 10 sections each level for 12 levels.
Does blocking website like facebook in huawei router will block also the access through their fb app?
It seems to me it’s not working because i’ve scheduled to block facebook during daytime but still our household members keep scrooling up and down in their fb app…
Or mali pagkagawa ko….
FB really makes you inefficient…tutok lagi sa phone! Arrrghhh!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You need to block the FB app’s web services in your router.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Done already the easy part… kinausap ko na ng maayos…kulang na lang mag pirmahan sa brgy. Kidding aside! Seriously, ive talked to them na several times..
Actually, i set a time interval pero yung time interval na ni set ko pansin ko panay pa rin scroll down… now im wondering…
App web sevices is ip address of the fb app? Iba yung ip ad sa url ng fb? Ginawa ko is during those interval time, blocked yung facebook.com…
Im done requesting them to refrain from using smartphone on a certain time kaya ang pinaka drastic plan move ko is to cut their internet accesss through mac address all day, 8pm till 6am lang sil pwede if ayaw pa din nila…
Pero if blocking the app web services will do during the time interval na ni set ko, much better…
Thanks guys.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dito ako nag set sa parental control menu ng router…
Allowed sila mag surfing sa ganun na oras pero bawal ang fb… pero hindi gumana…
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk