Is WWIII inevitable?

[shadow]

seriously...

i think this war is gonna get bigger

NATO will get pulled in

sana mali ako

Dapat lang to finally stop Putin. Dapat mas maaga sila pumasok they shouldn't wait na marami na nasira at namatay.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kisshmet]

Russian shelling of civilians in Obolon district, Kyiv.Attachment 41011Attachment 41012Attachment 41013Attachment 41014

Sent from my ASUS_Z017DA using Tsikot Forums mobile app

ukranian army refuse to be annihilated alone in an open field so they blend with the civilians

remember zelensky made civilians combatants by distributing weapons

snipers are positioning themselves in those apartment complexes and shooting at russian foot soldiers

Sent from my SM-A520W using Tsikot Forums mobile app

[Mr. Witcher]

Imagine kung wala nuclear missiles ang russia. Ganito pa din kaya ang position ng NATO.

[Egan101]

Imagine kung wala nuclear missiles ang russia. Ganito pa din kaya ang position ng NATO.

Kung Wala nukes yung Russia, binanatan na kaagad ng NATO yan. Just take the case of Serbia before.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kisshmet]

Dapat lang to finally stop Putin. Dapat mas maaga sila pumasok they shouldn't wait na marami na nasira at namatay.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

mas madaming mamamatay sa WW3

Sent from my SM-A520W using Tsikot Forums mobile app

[kisshmet]

seriously...

i think this war is gonna get bigger

NATO will get pulled in

sana mali ako

zelensky wants WW3 by goading NATO to implement a NO FLY ZONE coz their airforce and navy are already decimated

thats inviting WW3..im not for WW3 coz i know what the aftermath will be

Sent from my SM-A520W using Tsikot Forums mobile app

[kisshmet]

Kung Wala nukes yung Russia, binanatan na kaagad ng NATO yan. Just take the case of Serbia before.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

serbia is a lot WEAKER than russia

it will be a great fight between russia and NATO on a conventional level

US stealth technology vs russian air defense

russian ground troops are not scared of casualties engaging americans who are casualty conscious and air support reliant

US navy aircraft carriers vs russian cruise missiles

russian attack submarines vs US hunting each other

those scenarious are quite interesting

Sent from my SM-A520W using Tsikot Forums mobile app

[uls]

zelensky wants WW3 by goading NATO to implement a NO FLY ZONE coz their airforce and navy are already decimated

thats inviting WW3..im not for WW3 coz i know what the aftermath will be

Sent from my SM-A520W using Tsikot Forums mobile app

yes Zelensky begging the west to intervene (no fly zone, fighter jets)

British parliament



next is US congress



sooner or later Western decision-makers will give in

[shadow]

It's about time na tapusin na yun pag hostage ni Putin sa mundo.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Flipo]

Amir Tsarfati
BREAKING: Parliament of NATO member Estonia has voted in favor of a no-fly zone over Ukraine.

Sent from my ASUS_Z017DA using Tsikot Forums mobile app

[kisshmet]

yes Zelensky begging the west to intervene (no fly zone, fighter jets)

British parliament



next is US congress



sooner or later Western decision-makers will give in

biden wont and trump wont order a NO FLY ZONE and conflagrate WW3

they will keep it conventional in order to observe russian military operational capabilities and endurance

ukraine is just a testing ground to the west

Sent from my SM-A520W using Tsikot Forums mobile app

[kisshmet]

It's about time na tapusin na yun pag hostage ni Putin sa mundo.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

be careful what you wish for..putin isnt joking

Sent from my SM-A520W using Tsikot Forums mobile app

[kisshmet]

Amir Tsarfati
BREAKING: Parliament of NATO member Estonia has voted in favor of a no-fly zone over Ukraine.

Sent from my ASUS_Z017DA using Tsikot Forums mobile app

estonia doesnt have a credible airforce that can enforce a NO FLY ZONE against russia

they will rely on US and other wealthy european nations aircrafts which they wont allow to happen coz it will conflagrate WW3

they will not engage russian aircrafts in ukrainian airspace only on NATO airspace


Sent from my SM-A520W using Tsikot Forums mobile app

[toast]

Eto naman cluster bomb attack ng ukraine sa center donetsk. Both sides kawawa talaga civilians.

[kisshmet]

^if the ukranian army wont mix with civilian areas they wont be targeted

those russian combatants will head straight to kiev but had to secure their flanks due to resistance offered by ukranian army and militias

Sent from my SM-A520W using Tsikot Forums mobile app

[tsupermario]

it will be a great fight between russia and NATO on a conventional level

US stealth technology vs russian air defense

russian ground troops are not scared of casualties engaging americans who are casualty conscious and air support reliant

US navy aircraft carriers vs russian cruise missiles

russian attack submarines vs US hunting each other

those scenarious are quite interesting

Sent from my SM-A520W using Tsikot Forums mobile app

the russian military is losing alot of its prestige and perceived strength as the war drags on. in a conventional war, the us military will be very difficult to defeat. but with tactical nukes, russia possesses a great equalizer against the us military

On Tuesday, senior U.S. intelligence officials said they assessed that 2,000 to 4,000 Russian soldiers have been killed, while adding the caveat that they have “low confidence” in those numbers based on the limited information they have.

Even the lower American estimate would mark an extraordinary loss of life for the Russian military, which was expected to overwhelm Ukrainian forces. During the entire 20-year U.S. war in Afghanistan, 2,461 U.S. troops died. About an additional 4,500 U.S. troops were killed in the U.S. war in Iraq from March 2003 to December 2011, according to Defense Department statistics.

Michael Kofman, director of Russia studies at CNA, a think tank outside Washington, said the U.S. figure probably is closer to the truth than the Ukrainian one, which he said appears to be exaggerated. Still, he said, that scale of loss is significant — especially when coupled with the loss of hundreds of vehicles, including about 160 tanks, according to open-source reporting he has reviewed.
…

The past two weeks have shown that just because Russia has the tools of war, that does not mean commanders know how to effectively use them.

François Heisbourg, a French political analyst who used to advise President Emmanuel Macron on national security, said the Russian advances have been strikingly limited.

“They’ve only taken one regional capital out of the 26 which were free of Russian influence before Feb. 25,” Heisbourg said.

And with a fight looming against dug-in Ukrainian troops in each of the cities that remain, it is unclear whether Russia has the capacity — or the will — to succeed.

“The logistics are pathetic. The soldiers are definitely not motivated,” he said. “It’s not what you would call a steady advance. There is actually very little terrain occupied.”
…

Malcolm Chalmers, deputy director general of RUSI, a London-based think tank, said he’s been surprised at the “very poor performance” of the Russian air force, which has yet to knock out all Ukrainian air assets and defenses — something he had thought would take a matter of days.

The Russian air force, although old, consists of several hundred high-end fixed-wing aircraft that are roughly equivalent to their Western counterparts. But the Russians, he said, “don’t seem to be able to coordinate the use of them together, and deconflict them and ensure they aren’t shooting each other.”

After more than two weeks of war, the Russian military grinds forward at a heavy cost
Russia has gained only limited territory, while suffering substantial losses in both personnel and equipment

https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...ield-progress/


but an f-22 raptor or f-35 going against a sukhoi su-57 or s400 is indeed interesting

[uls]

[uls]

from a local facebook group

may demand na

naghahanda na for nuclear war

[shadow]

Official says Russian troops take 5 hostage - SUNSTAR

Dapat na talaga pumasok NATO. enough is enough.

Ako talaga feeling ko facade na lang yan vaunted military power ng Russia. That's what putin want the world to believe pero wala na yan siguro.

Parang sa Iraq lang na dami sinasabi na ubusin ang mga US pag pumasok supot naman pala.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Egan101]

Official says Russian troops take 5 hostage - SUNSTAR

Dapat na talaga pumasok NATO. enough is enough.

Ako talaga feeling ko facade na lang yan vaunted military power ng Russia. That's what putin want the world to believe pero wala na yan siguro.

Parang sa Iraq lang na dami sinasabi na ubusin ang mga US pag pumasok supot naman pala.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Iraq didn’t have nukes though. The US and NATO are cautious. Iraq didn’t have the capability to hit the major cities of the US and NATO.

Russia has both strategic and tactical nukes. Tactical nukes which can be deployed in artillery shells and bombardment rockets can be catastrophic if used in Europe. Even low-yield devices between 10 to 50 kilotons could wipe out major cities within conflict zones (Kyiv, Lviv, etc). Hiroshima was hit by a 20-kiloton device and it was already horrific.

'Limited' Tactical Nuclear Weapons Would Be Catastrophic - Scientific American


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk