Is WWIII inevitable?

[jick.cejoco]

Kawawa China nyan. Weak ang navy nya, after the allies sink their ships paano na.

Sinong maaawa sa abusadong bully?

[b_9904]

Sinong maaawa sa abusadong bully?

The vodka guys?

[b_9904]

First
Learn how to use the weapon
Second
Learn how to maintain it
Third
Learn corrective action if it fails when you need it
Fourth
Learn weapons retention otherwise the person at the opposite end of the weapon use it against you
Fifth
Learn weapons discipline and weapons capability
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rifl...note-Lejeune-1

Thanks bro.

This is almost the same as the prepper stuff I am into.

I especially like Jeff Cooper's book. which goes into the psyche of the person.

You have to add at least some basic outdoors topics as well. Throw in some principles of guerrilla warfare and you got yourself someone who MIGHT be an asset in a war.

Conversely, someone who did not prepare for war might actually be the war hero we deserve. Ohhh... life.

[b_9904]

Seven Reasons China Will Start a War By 2017
by David Archibald April 30, 2015

At least he got the last part right.

"It will be one of the most pointless, stupid and destructive wars in history, but that is what is coming."

He should have added pollution.

If the article is correct, then China is doing a WW2 Germany - that is depending on stockpiles until they secure wells. Which is a gambit really. But, if it strikes a huge deposit of natural gas or oil in the coast of Vietnam then it will be a cold day in hell for the rest of us. If Russia enters the war then we are ALL fracked.

War is fought with resources, not necessarily materials (men and machines). If your materials run out of resources to run them then they are useless in war.

So does China have enough food and can it produce enough food to sustain a short war?

Does it have enough oil (read: all oil products) to sustain it machines?

Can it replace those machines fast enough during war?

Does it have enough EXPERTS and TRAINED people?

Can it train people to replace those they lost?

Does it have the ability to move supplies, men and machines to its fronts fast enough?

Clearly, I am insinuating something here but these are the questions worth asking.

[e2romo]

If WW3 erupts nukes will definitely be used. Those who are equipped with nukes and is loosing the war will use them as a last ditch effort.

[jick.cejoco]

Partial annihilation of the overpopulated human race.

[dreamur]

Partial annihilation of the overpopulated human race.

Nature's unnatural way of controlling the earth's population.

[ClaNker]

Sinong maaawa sa abusadong bully?

Russia, then magiging kawawa din ang Russia.

[Ry_Tower]

Russia, then magiging kawawa din ang Russia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



Russia, then magiging kawawa din ang Russia.

Ayus yan.

[Morz]

I think It may not be a full war but may just be a naval and air force war in the south china sea. Objective is to push them out and put them in their place. Attacking china in their homeland will not be advisable as Allies will loose world support and china will be forced to use nukes.

[kisshmet]

^next is the unthinkable, nuclear escalation

[ClaNker]

I think It may not be a full war but may just be a naval and air force war in the south china sea. Objective is to push them out and put them in their place. Attacking china in their homeland will not be advisable as Allies will loose world support and china will be forced to use nukes.

If China will resort to nukes then you can bet you bottom dollar they will be destroyed by allies with impunity.

[jick.cejoco]

If China will resort to nukes then you can bet you bottom dollar they will be destroyed by allies with impunity.

Hit their nuke silo with a bunk buster munition after it is armed just before launch, that way, the u.s. Is not to blame and the Chinese over population is reduced

[Horsepower]

I'm okay with US nuking China. Except HK. I like the place and the people there.

[Newcomer123]

Using nukes is MAD - Mutually Assured Destruction. I hope any confrontation will not resort to using nukes, as it also kills the land, reducing habitable or arable locations.

Mag combat na lang ala- Achilles vs Hector, o virtual fight sa Counterstrike with nations at stake. To the winner- all the unspoiled resources.

[safeorigin]

World War III is an economic war.

Nukes and armies are merely pawns in the grander scheme of things. Going for the purse has far more devastating effects than standing armies.

Fiat currency system being challenged by the looming gold standard system

And whatever sh*t happens in Greece will spread like wildfire.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

World War III is an economic war.

Nukes and armies are merely pawns in the grander scheme of things. Going for the purse has far more devastating effects than standing armies.

Fiat currency system being challenged by the looming gold standard system

And whatever sh*t happens in Greece will spread like wildfire.

[Monseratto]

With all the rhetorics and sabre rattling in media, China and the US has more mutual concerns to talk about than just the reclamation of the South China Sea. And PNoy is not invited, only two superpowers allowed.

US to host 'strategic and economic' dialogue with China to resolve disputes - The Economic Times

[safeorigin]

In the mean time, Greece is seeking out Russia's help monetarily while Ukraine is looking towards IMF.

[ninjababez]

In the mean time, Greece is seeking out Russia's help monetarily while Ukraine is looking towards IMF.

Ano meron sa greece, huli nanaman ako sa balita.

[_Cathy_]

Ano meron sa greece, huli nanaman ako sa balita.

Alam ko lang they might exit the eurozone.