Sogie bill

**Ry_Tower** · March 24th, 2018 11:24 AM

Originally Posted by carwhacko

I agree. Hindi ba maintindihan ng church yun? Na may separation ng State and Church.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Alam nila yan, nagproprotest lang naman pero wala naman magagawa kung may batas na. Parang death penalty lang din, depende lang sa nakaupong presidente.

**dr. d** · March 24th, 2018 11:26 AM

Originally Posted by carwhacko

I agree. Hindi ba maintindihan ng church yun? Na may separation ng State and Church.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

they know.
but they probably feel it is a sin of omission, if they did not raise a protest.... i would!

**Vodka** · March 24th, 2018 11:27 AM

Originally Posted by carwhacko

I agree. Hindi ba maintindihan ng church yun? Na may separation ng State and Church.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

back then the church WAS the state

so now they're doing everything to preserve their power and influence

**carwhacko** · March 24th, 2018 07:34 PM

Pass or not naman wala naman magbabago, IMO.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

**_Cathy_** · March 26th, 2018 01:26 AM

They are discussing the bill at "diyos at bayan". The topic is: "What are the dangers of the sogie bill?"

I came from a traditional and conservative Roman Catholic family, but these people take bigotry at a whole new level

Napunta na sa bestiality e

Grabe naman tingin nila sa homo***uals.

**falken** · March 26th, 2018 08:50 AM

Originally Posted by _Cathy_

They are discussing the bill at "diyos at bayan". The topic is: "What are the dangers of the sogie bill?"

I came from a traditional and conservative Roman Catholic family, but these people take bigotry at a whole new level

Napunta na sa bestiality e

Grabe naman tingin nila sa homo***uals.

Catholic here. Some of these people would say anything just to get what they want. And I don't have any respect for them.

**kreme** · March 27th, 2018 11:14 PM

Ang palaging argument ng church is majority christians daw ang Philippines, e ano naman. Dapat isupport parin ng govt yung minority, anjan na yung homo***uals e. So either isabatas ni govt na crime ang homo***uality para di na nya kelangan gumawa ng batas to help homo***uals or iaccept nya si homo***uals and create law to support them.

Wag dapat makialam si Church di naman ibigsabihin na mas dadami pa ang homo***uals pag pinasa yung bill. Ipasa or hindi, dadami parin yan.

)

**kagalingan** · August 16th, 2019 02:22 PM

dito nyo paglaban yung comfort room ng mga bading.

nakakanangbuhay talaga yan. National interest saan magccr si mamah!!!

dapat tinawag na lang na syoke bill.

**KingoftheNorth** · August 16th, 2019 04:33 PM

What I don't understand is:

1. Was the trans denied the use of the CR altogether or merely prevented from using the ladies' CR? IMHO, denying the trans the use of a CR , not necessarily the ladies' CR is discrimination.

2. Why is there an assumption by the LGBT community that using the men's CR by any trans will result in harrassment or harm? What if a business in QC designated the men's room as the CR for LGBT? Paparusahan pa rin?

3. Why do women who identify as men insist on using the ladies' CR as well?

We were all taught (at least in my generation) that your genitals determine your s3x and that is the basis for the classification of who gets to use the CR. That classification is BASED on science and not preference. Unless the trans has undergone s3x change surgery.

Sorry but I'm with shadow. Masyado pinapalaki ang issue. It's not as if the janitress threw the person out of the premises for being a trans.

Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk

**chronicle** · August 16th, 2019 05:04 PM

http://=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/...ison-***ually]

Eto ang iniiwasan na mangyari ni janetress sa farmers.
Mga rougue trans.

Palitan nyo na lang ung asterisk ng word na s3x. Filtered message.
Sent from my BLL-L22 using Tapatalk