Personally, I am in favor of LGBT marriage... I think twice na may pumunta sa house selling us properties/cars/appliances etc yung partner kasi may sakit and gusto nya na cash ang iwan sa gf/bf nya para wala nang habol mga kamag anak nya.
If "kasal" sana sila... Di magmamadali magbenta yung tao... (May sakit)
As for the "wedding with gown etc" for sure di papayagan ng church yan... Pero kung private party with a Judge(etc), why not? It's a private event and pwede nila gawin kahit anong gusto nila.
Sent from my ASUS_Z017DA using Tapatalk
High tech na talaga ang mundo. Marami ng pabor. Baka sa susunod ang anak pwede ng asawahin ang ina, ang tatay pwede na ring asawahin ang babaeng anak.
Epekto kaya to ng maitim na bugang usok ng non euro 4 cars.[emoji23]
Sent from my VTR-L29 using Tapatalk
Kung ayaw ng Church eh di huwag. Wala naman plano mga Third *** na magpakasal sa simbahan, Maybe they can call it legal union or something and not "marriage" para wala ng satsat simbahan.
As long magkaroon sila ng same Rights as straight couples sa mga conjugal properties ok lang yan.
Unfair naman talaga eh.
But heres the thing people respects their rights but they should also respect if people still feel uncomfortable around them and not used it against them.
I support you wacko. Macho Macho mo na ha.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
after all it is a law we are talking about not church doctrine. same as with the divorce law. wala naman magagawa ang church kung magkaron ng same *** marriage and divorce sa pinas. and it is actually already late, dapat nuon pa meron na both laws. lalo na ang divorce.
Pass or not naman wala naman magbabago, IMO.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They are discussing the bill at "diyos at bayan". The topic is: "What are the dangers of the sogie bill?"
I came from a traditional and conservative Roman Catholic family, but these people take bigotry at a whole new level![]()
Napunta na sa bestiality eGrabe naman tingin nila sa homo***uals.
Ang palaging argument ng church is majority christians daw ang Philippines, e ano naman. Dapat isupport parin ng govt yung minority, anjan na yung homo***uals e. So either isabatas ni govt na crime ang homo***uality para di na nya kelangan gumawa ng batas to help homo***uals or iaccept nya si homo***uals and create law to support them.
Wag dapat makialam si Church di naman ibigsabihin na mas dadami pa ang homo***uals pag pinasa yung bill. Ipasa or hindi, dadami parin yan.)
dito nyo paglaban yung comfort room ng mga bading.
nakakanangbuhay talaga yan. National interest saan magccr si mamah!!!
dapat tinawag na lang na syoke bill.
What I don't understand is:
1. Was the trans denied the use of the CR altogether or merely prevented from using the ladies' CR? IMHO, denying the trans the use of a CR , not necessarily the ladies' CR is discrimination.
2. Why is there an assumption by the LGBT community that using the men's CR by any trans will result in harrassment or harm? What if a business in QC designated the men's room as the CR for LGBT? Paparusahan pa rin?
3. Why do women who identify as men insist on using the ladies' CR as well?
We were all taught (at least in my generation) that your genitals determine your s3x and that is the basis for the classification of who gets to use the CR. That classification is BASED on science and not preference. Unless the trans has undergone s3x change surgery.
Sorry but I'm with shadow. Masyado pinapalaki ang issue. It's not as if the janitress threw the person out of the premises for being a trans.
Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk