Massive scale corruption exposed/unfolding

**macsd** · August 8th, 2015 09:23 PM

3rd, last batch charged for pork in NGOs of Napoles | Inquirer News

The NBI recommended the prosecution for malversation, bribery and graft nine incumbent and former lawmakers and 31 others, including Sen. Gregorio Honasan II, Cagayan de Oro Rep. Rufus Rodriguez, Technical Education Skills and Development Authority (Tesda) Director General Joel Villanueva, La Union Rep. Victor Ortega, Manila Rep. Amado Bagatsing, incumbent Abono party-list Rep. and former Pangasinan Rep. Conrad Estrella III, former Abono party-list Rep. Robert Raymund Estrella, former La Union Rep. Manuel Ortega, and former Zamboanga representative Isidoro Real Jr.

I remember when this mader facker Joel Villanueva was still in congress for CIBAC whose crusade is anti-corruption. And here he is now in the list of what he is crusading for. Let me guess, his a firm believer of "if you cannot beat them, join them". What can Juan dela Cruz expect from this mader facker who's only vote comes from JIL, nothing but all lies in thin air. Tax free na nga ang racket ng secta nila, pati tax ng bayan tinira pa. Mabulok sana ang putanginang ito sa kulungan ng mga buwaya.

Little by little the LP senatorial line up are being filled up by persons of ill repute. Cguro ang battle plan ng yellow army, kung meron magnanakaw sa UNA, meron din ang LP.

**macsd** · August 11th, 2015 04:43 PM

Joel Villanueva: Some LP forces want me out of admin loop | Inquirer News

Who ever told this mader facker his welcome?

**Monseratto** · August 18th, 2015 02:34 PM

Dahil more than 70 yo++ na si tanda, na grant ng bail daw...

BREAKING: SC grants Enrile bid for bailâ€”sources | Inquirer News

**macsd** · August 18th, 2015 07:52 PM

Can the lawyers in the house please help to explain. I am totally at a loss :twister3:

**170kphlang** · August 18th, 2015 08:35 PM

so kapag 69 ka na and a few days shy away of your birthday, gawa ka na krimen..

**chua_riwap** · August 18th, 2015 08:43 PM

Originally Posted by macsd

Can the lawyers in the house please help to explain. I am totally at a loss :twister3:

Why? PM atty JM.

**cast_no_shadow** · August 18th, 2015 09:51 PM

Originally Posted by chua_riwap

Why? PM atty JM.

He's talking about ata sa granting ng bail kay manong johnny

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

**Monseratto** · August 19th, 2015 08:15 AM

Under Article 13 of the Revised Penal Code, one of the circumstances which may mitigate criminal liability is when “the offender is under 18 year of age or over 70 years.”

As such, the corresponding jail penalty may be suspended based on the discretion of the court or waived by virtue of executive clemency by the President, according to a Sandiganbayan justice.

The Supreme Court however clarified in a recent ruling that old age is not applicable as a mitigating circumstance if the offender was not yet 70 years of age at the time the crime was committed.

In a 2010 ruling, the tribunal reversed a Sandiganbayan ruling granting the mitigating circumstance of advanced age after it calculated that the offender was only 63 years old at the time of the commission of the crime. As such, “petitioner was not entitled to such mitigating circumstance,” the ruling said.

Thus, Enrile may cite his advanced age as mitigating factor in case of conviction and his jail penalty could be waived by the court – in this case the Sandiganbayan.

But while the case is pending, Enrile could not cite old age to avoid spending time in jail. So far, there is no jurisprudence that could favor him, according to the veteran lawyer.

90-year-old Enrile may still spend time in jail

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Under Article 13 of the Revised Penal Code, one of the circumstances which may mitigate criminal liability is when “the offender is under 18 year of age or over 70 years.”

As such, the corresponding jail penalty may be suspended based on the discretion of the court or waived by virtue of executive clemency by the President, according to a Sandiganbayan justice.

The Supreme Court however clarified in a recent ruling that old age is not applicable as a mitigating circumstance if the offender was not yet 70 years of age at the time the crime was committed.

In a 2010 ruling, the tribunal reversed a Sandiganbayan ruling granting the mitigating circumstance of advanced age after it calculated that the offender was only 63 years old at the time of the commission of the crime. As such, “petitioner was not entitled to such mitigating circumstance,” the ruling said.

Thus, Enrile may cite his advanced age as mitigating factor in case of conviction and his jail penalty could be waived by the court – in this case the Sandiganbayan.

But while the case is pending, Enrile could not cite old age to avoid spending time in jail. So far, there is no jurisprudence that could favor him, according to the veteran lawyer.

http://www.rappler.com/nation/50901-enrile-time-jail

**kinyo** · August 19th, 2015 11:34 AM

bigla na lang mawawalan ng sakit yang si tatang ... mangangampanya para kay nognog

**macsd** · August 19th, 2015 02:51 PM

Seem's like the lawyers in the house are also at a lost.

Here's my best guess on how tanda could have been granted. It's likely all tied up and related to the Corona impeachment as all those who voted for the bail issuance were all GMA hold overs except for Carpio. I think everyone just paid their "utang na loob" to tanda who was then the presiding officer in the impeachment trial.

I don't believe this is a matter of law, it's a matter of something fishy. How can SC come ahead of the Sandigan Bayan in issuing a decision on bail when the bail hearing is still going on for already a year. This is a grand scheme , a plunder case has been filed and the court is hearing on the request for bail after already a year, not even the plunder case proper.

FISHY??? FISHY ??? FISHY ???