Digong, The President

[Yatta]

may pyansa .para lang masabi na legal ang pag aresto at hindi mag mukang tanga ang mga DUTETE SUPOTer

If they thought it would shut up Trillianes, they are dead wrong. After a few weeks of quiet and Ompong/landslide news, they guy is again on TV and radio giving more interviews.

Sent from my SM-T825Y using Tapatalk

[Wh1stl3r]

Wala na. Ang mga batas sa atin parang road signs na suggestions na lang. Kung ano pumasok sa utak, yun na ang tama. Galing talaga ni katay.

[Ketib]

Sorry.....

Sent from my VTR-L29 using Tapatalk

[Yatta]

In other news...

DOJ rejects raps filed vs blogger Drew Olivar for insufficient documents | Inquirer News

Sent from my Mi A1 using Tapatalk

[Devastator]

In other news...

DOJ rejects raps filed vs blogger Drew Olivar for insufficient documents | Inquirer News

Sent from my Mi A1 using Tapatalk

As long as you kiss the prez's arse you are untouchable.

[minicarph]

dinalaw din ata nya yun Palparan na General na kakahuli lang lately nasa isang media report

so bale magkita muna siguro sila sa detention ngaun.

[2lits17]

In other news...

DOJ rejects raps filed vs blogger Drew Olivar for insufficient documents | Inquirer News

Sent from my Mi A1 using Tapatalk

oh no.... this is sad... pag ang admin nag hanap ng butas for sure may kaso at may paglalagyan. pero pag ang mga taga administration ang hinanapan ng butas maliwanag pa sa sikat ng araw ang ebidensya pero insufficient pa din.

mukhang nag OT si Mocha sa palasyo para ma abswelto. lodi talaga yan si Mocha. untouchable.

[dreamur]

A new low in Philippine democracy and shitty election campaign.

DURING THE OATH TAKING & INDUCTION CEREMONIES

“Kilala niyo na si Sec Bong Go?”

“Hindi!!!”

“Oh ‘wag na nating ituloy to....yung hindi nakakakilala kay BG walang PRC license”

Source: Twitter
The original uploader doesn't want his/her name posted. He/she wants to remain anonymous.

DURING THE OATH TAKING & INDUCTION CEREMONIES

“Kilala niyo na si Sec Bong Go?”

“Hindi!!!”

“Oh ‘wag na nating ituloy to....yung hindi nakakakilala kay BG walang PRC license”

Source: Twitter
The original uploader doesn't want his/her name posted. He/she wants to remain anonymous.

Tagging Professional Regulatory Commission Republic of the Philippines ano toh?????

Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk

[badkuk]

There's this article on Inquirer today, regarding the Pantaleon bridge reconstruction...apparently the weather-proof bridge was constructed only in 2011 by an Austrian firm. So why rehabilitate it now? Either the Austrians did shoddy work, or...something else. Since there really was not that much media buzz about the bridge having structural/safety issues, i'm leaning more towards the "something else".

The project is funded by China.

[_Qwerty_]

sabi sa articles, 9 years na yung bridge and weak na daw kasi double daw yung capacity na dumadaan.. and kaya nila gigibain eh papalitan nang mas matibay and from 2 lanes gagawing 4 lanes..

There's this article on Inquirer today, regarding the Pantaleon bridge reconstruction...apparently the weather-proof bridge was constructed only in 2011 by an Austrian firm. So why rehabilitate it now? Either the Austrians did shoddy work, or...something else. Since there really was not that much media buzz about the bridge having structural/safety issues, i'm leaning more towards the "something else".

The project is funded by China.

[dr. d]

There's this article on Inquirer today, regarding the Pantaleon bridge reconstruction...apparently the weather-proof bridge was constructed only in 2011 by an Austrian firm. So why rehabilitate it now? Either the Austrians did shoddy work, or...something else. Since there really was not that much media buzz about the bridge having structural/safety issues, i'm leaning more towards the "something else".

The project is funded by China.

is it possible, there's nothing really structurally wrong with that bridge?
are they rehabilitating the bridge, because of structural defects, or to widen it?
if the latter, then the timing really sucks. big time.

and someone saw thru it?
hence the "work stop"?

[WallyWest]

If it were really urgent, they wouldn't flip flop at the first public outcry.

[_Qwerty_]

i don't think there's anything wrong with that bridge.. everyday don ako dumadaan.. matibay naman sya..

gusto lang yata nila talaga i widen.. or part yata nung China grant yun.. so hinahanapan nila kung san gagamitin yung Chinese grant?

is it possible, there's nothing really structurally wrong with that bridge?
are they rehabilitating the bridge, because of structural defects, or to widen it?
if the latter, then the timing really sucks. big time.

and someone saw thru it?
hence the "work stop"?

[dr. d]

i don't think there's anything wrong with that bridge.. everyday don ako dumadaan.. matibay naman sya..

gusto lang yata nila talaga i widen.. or part yata nung China grant yun.. so hinahanapan nila kung san gagamitin yung Chinese grant?

ang daming lugar na nanganga-ilangan ng tulay...!

dun na lang nila gawin yan.

[shadow]

Meron din akong nabasang article yesterday na puro Chinese workers ang gagawa nun bridge and useless din na widen nila dahil pagbaba ganun pa rin. May funnel lang and hinde ba pwedeng open lang nila since wala naman defects? Gawa na lang sila sa tabi nun bago para hinde affected masyado traffic? Parang sa mga probinsya


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[badkuk]

i don't think there's anything wrong with that bridge.. everyday don ako dumadaan.. matibay naman sya..

gusto lang yata nila talaga i widen.. or part yata nung China grant yun.. so hinahanapan nila kung san gagamitin yung Chinese grant?

Matrapik ba talaga dun sir?

Sorry not an engineer...i don't quite get the capacity thing. You can only fit a certain number of vehicles in a given space, say a bridge. Granted trucks are bigger and heavier, i find it unlikely that they didn't factor this in. Even so, there should be a maximum load rating -- heavier vehicles will just have to take a different route.

[Ketib]

is it possible, there's nothing really structurally wrong with that bridge?
are they rehabilitating the bridge, because of structural defects, or to widen it?
if the latter, then the timing really sucks. big time.

and someone saw thru it?
hence the "work stop"?

Yes, it is possible. Kung meron man provide sila(DPWH) structural defects reports. If hindi ma provide pwede pakiramdaman or mata-mata na lang. IMO

[shadow]

Keep it open then construct the new bridge sa tabi.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Yatta]

i don't think there's anything wrong with that bridge.. everyday don ako dumadaan.. matibay naman sya..

gusto lang yata nila talaga i widen.. or part yata nung China grant yun.. so hinahanapan nila kung san gagamitin yung Chinese grant?

There are ways to widen a bridge without having to tear down the entire structure. The bridge near our place along Quirino Hiway has been up since 40+ years ago. Maraming truck ng semento dumadaan dun. And I remember they rehabbed Guadalupe Bridge years ago without tearing it down. Can't help but lean towards the Visor article.

Sent from my Mi A1 using Tapatalk

[Ketib]

Matrapik ba talaga dun sir?

Sorry not an engineer...i don't quite get the capacity thing. You can only fit a certain number of vehicles in a given space, say a bridge. Granted trucks are bigger and heavier, i find it unlikely that they didn't factor this in. Even so, there should be a maximum load rating -- heavier vehicles will just have to take a different route.

Kaya dapat strict ang weighbridge station to limit into allowable max loading. Structural engineers always put a factor there in. Halos hindi na nga papasok ang semento sa sobrang dami/laki ng bakal.