*all,
Sorry, I can't help it... Ipagpatawad nyo na lang po...
advice to Joned, again, please wag magbuhat ng sariling bangko, kasi...
Stating that "50% Cager and Biker = enlightened" is an example of false logic.
Previous premises, can/may still be interpreted as this...
IF, Let:
=> 100% cager = ignorant
=> 100% biker = ignorant
==> ignorant = x
Kung ipipilit natin yung (50% cager and 50% biker)...
==> ((x/2) + (x/2)) = x = w/c is still ignorant
Then if:
=> x + x = 2x
==> 2x = twice as ignorant
If we're going to argue about context and how the premises was used/stated, we should not forget that someone here used figures such as 100% and 50%, and the equal operator (=). This leaves as to literal logic interpretation.
Another advice... stop calling people stupid, ignorant, narrow minded, idiot, etc if you yourself can't handle being called as such.
Which one are you?
Hehe, just kidding.
