One dead over LED headlight argument

**XTO** · February 17th, 2016 09:00 AM

Originally Posted by niky

Still a pretty stupid idea. What if the other guy didn't miss?

No, if you're confident about your ability, it would be as simple. Notice how he retaliate and where is the patama?

**CVT** · February 17th, 2016 09:03 AM

Originally Posted by niky

Still a pretty stupid idea. What if the other guy didn't miss?

That's the popular story....

What if the Engineer did all the shooting?

And then shot his foot?...

"Dead men

Tell No

Tales...."

Investigation... Investigation... Investigation....

"The measure of a man is what he does with power" LJIOHF!

28.9K _/_/_/_/_/:waltz1:_/_/_/_/_/

**Egan101** · February 17th, 2016 09:12 AM

Such a stupidity and worse, you get such attitude from professionals.

What were they thinking? Parang wild wild west ah.

**machine.pistol** · February 17th, 2016 09:20 AM

Yes, the better storyteller will normally emerge as the winner. But what is crucial here, if the story is to be believed, is that they first went home, presumably to get their firearms, to shoot at each other afterwards.

**XTO** · February 17th, 2016 09:21 AM

Cold murder yan kung di nakaisa yung abugado, natural may witnesses yan dahil naghamunan na eh so dami na tsismoso/mosa yan

**lichking616** · February 17th, 2016 09:24 AM

Originally Posted by noitimed

Both are college graduates; One is a Lawyer, the other one is an Engineer. Their respective EQ left them when they need it most. Between going home, getting their guns and shooting each other, what were they thinking?

bobo ng abugado

**dr. d** · February 17th, 2016 09:26 AM

Originally Posted by unmarked

Walang pinipili ang road rage talaga. Educated or not. Self control ang true test.
Mejo OT: knowing na willingly sila nag duel, may laban ba yung namatayan sa korte?

keeping the gun at home is one way to dissuade road rage from escalating into something else. but in this instance, if the story is true, they went out of their ways to go home and get their weapons...?? clearly the intent to kill was there. blood lust! murder and attempted murder!
what were they thinking??!!! were they drunk? or was it a bad day at the office?

**XTO** · February 17th, 2016 09:43 AM

Originally Posted by dr. d

keeping the gun at home is one way to dissuade road rage from escalating into something else. but in this instance, if the story is true, they went out of their ways to go home and get their weapons...?? clearly the intent to kill was there. blood lust! murder and attempted murder!
what were they thinking??!!! were they drunk? or was it a bad day at the office?

sometimes, the ego and pride put you in delicate situation, maybe yes maybe the intent is to make "duro" or see if the other one won't show up and naturally he's the more "astig" but nagkasubuan na so ayun....sayang mga pinag-aralan nila

**yebo** · February 17th, 2016 10:10 AM

both of them went home to get their guns.

both had premeditated intention to kill.

one was wounded. attempted murder.

one died. murder.

it does not matter who shot first. both were equally guilty.

2 a$$holes off the streets.

unless of course the fiscal and the judge err in favor of money then it's only 1 a$$hole off the streets.

**Altis6453** · February 17th, 2016 10:46 AM

Originally Posted by lichking616

bobo ng abugado

+1 He SHOULD HAVE known better.

Originally Posted by yebo

both of them went home to get their guns.

both had premeditated intention to kill.

one was wounded. attempted murder.

one died. murder.

it does not matter who shot first. both were equally guilty.

2 a$$holes off the streets.

unless of course the fiscal and the judge err in favor of money then it's only 1 a$$hole off the streets.

Yep. There is no case for self-defense as the element of unlawful aggression was not present. The survivor may be liable for the crime of Dueling under Art. 260 of the Revised Penal Code.