One dead over LED headlight argument

[XTO]

Still a pretty stupid idea. What if the other guy didn't miss?

No, if you're confident about your ability, it would be as simple. Notice how he retaliate and where is the patama?

[CVT]

Still a pretty stupid idea. What if the other guy didn't miss?

That's the popular story....

What if the Engineer did all the shooting?

And then shot his foot?...

"Dead men

Tell No

Tales...."

Investigation... Investigation... Investigation....


"The measure of a man is what he does with power" LJIOHF!

28.9K _/_/_/_/_/:waltz1:_/_/_/_/_/

[Egan101]

Such a stupidity and worse, you get such attitude from professionals.

What were they thinking? Parang wild wild west ah.

[machine.pistol]

Yes, the better storyteller will normally emerge as the winner. But what is crucial here, if the story is to be believed, is that they first went home, presumably to get their firearms, to shoot at each other afterwards.

[XTO]

Cold murder yan kung di nakaisa yung abugado, natural may witnesses yan dahil naghamunan na eh so dami na tsismoso/mosa yan

[lichking616]

Both are college graduates; One is a Lawyer, the other one is an Engineer. Their respective EQ left them when they need it most. Between going home, getting their guns and shooting each other, what were they thinking?

bobo ng abugado

[dr. d]

Walang pinipili ang road rage talaga. Educated or not. Self control ang true test.
Mejo OT: knowing na willingly sila nag duel, may laban ba yung namatayan sa korte?

keeping the gun at home is one way to dissuade road rage from escalating into something else. but in this instance, if the story is true, they went out of their ways to go home and get their weapons...?? clearly the intent to kill was there. blood lust! murder and attempted murder!
what were they thinking??!!! were they drunk? or was it a bad day at the office?

[XTO]

keeping the gun at home is one way to dissuade road rage from escalating into something else. but in this instance, if the story is true, they went out of their ways to go home and get their weapons...?? clearly the intent to kill was there. blood lust! murder and attempted murder!
what were they thinking??!!! were they drunk? or was it a bad day at the office?

sometimes, the ego and pride put you in delicate situation, maybe yes maybe the intent is to make "duro" or see if the other one won't show up and naturally he's the more "astig" but nagkasubuan na so ayun....sayang mga pinag-aralan nila

[yebo]

both of them went home to get their guns.

both had premeditated intention to kill.

one was wounded. attempted murder.

one died. murder.

it does not matter who shot first. both were equally guilty.

2 a$$holes off the streets.

unless of course the fiscal and the judge err in favor of money then it's only 1 a$$hole off the streets.

[Altis6453]

bobo ng abugado

+1 He SHOULD HAVE known better.

both of them went home to get their guns.

both had premeditated intention to kill.

one was wounded. attempted murder.

one died. murder.

it does not matter who shot first. both were equally guilty.

2 a$$holes off the streets.

unless of course the fiscal and the judge err in favor of money then it's only 1 a$$hole off the streets.

Yep. There is no case for self-defense as the element of unlawful aggression was not present. The survivor may be liable for the crime of Dueling under Art. 260 of the Revised Penal Code.

[Ry_Tower]

Hindi pa nahimasmasan nung umuwi nang bahay?

via Imgflip Meme Maker

[KenGarcia]

Hindi pa nahimasmasan nung umuwi nang bahay?

via Imgflip Meme Maker

Kung ako yan uuwi nalang ako ng bahay and I will the live the rest of my life happy. YOLO!

[Juan Martinez]

I heard this over a radio station this morning. Apparently after the argument the two agreed to a gun duel. They went home and come back to the agreed meeting place and shot each other. Pathetic.

news link from inquirer:

The police said that Belen stopped his vehicle and confronted Cristobal, complaining about the glare coming from his motorcycle’s headlight.

The two got into an argument, resulting in both of them going to their homes and returning to the scene with their firearms.

Belen fired first, hitting Cristobal in the feet, apparently to teach him a lesson, according to Bustamante.

However, Cristobal, a professional shooter, retaliated by shooting him thrice in the chest. He then went to the Police Community Precinct Station 6 and gave himself up.

Read more: 1 dead, 1 wounded as gun owners argue | Inquirer News
Follow us: *inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook

1) a newspaper report is hearsay. inadmissible in evidence unless the rule on "independently relevant statement" applies.

2) IF TRUE, violation of art. 260 rpc. no separate crime of murder. reason: double jeopardy.

3) another violation if true: comelec gun ban

4) IN COURT, it is not what you know, but what you can prove.

5) lesson: if you're a hothead, carry a gun and die early.

6) i agree with the opinion of altis and machine pistol, in the same way that if i had my wisdom tooth extracted i would see a dentist.

7) i would have agreed with the opinion of attorney but he was banned. i think his punishment was not commensurate to his offense. that's why i asked "what is the standard?" and that's why i lost a little enthusiasm to post.

[dreamur]

*JM, dont let the fire die bro...keep shining the light.

[Juan Martinez]

*JM, dont let the fire die bro...keep shining the light.

i just remember Pastor Martin Niemöller bro:

When they came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist..

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I didn't speak up,
because I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no-one left
to speak out.

[BratPAQ]

daming butas sa istorya. malamang imbento na lang to.

tulad ng umuwi pa para kumuha ng baril. most likely one or both of them have guns on their vehicle. imbento na lang ang umuwi to avoid the gun ban law.

And the attorney shooting the engineer on the foot. did he think that the engineer wouldn't retaliate by killing him? I don't own a gun, but of you know the other party has a gun, it's either kill or be killed.

Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk

[anonemus]

i just remember Pastor Martin Niemöller bro:

When they came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist..

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I didn't speak up,
because I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no-one left
to speak out.

Bagay ito sa Duterte thread, Atty 👍

[unmarked]

yung tipong magkalayo pa sila ng bahay, umuwi, tapos na trapik pa sila, all the while may baril sila parehas para sa duelo. Buti nag agree sila sa lugar ng duel nila LOL. Can't decide if story is funny or shocking.

[BratPAQ]

yung tipong magkalayo pa sila ng bahay, umuwi, tapos na trapik pa sila, all the while may baril sila parehas para sa duelo. Buti nag agree sila sa lugar ng duel nila LOL. Can't decide if story is funny or shocking.

eh na trapik yung isa, kaya nag Text pa "kups, where na you, dito na me"

Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk

[anonemus]

eh na trapik yung isa, kaya nag Text pa "kups, where na you, dito na me"

Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk

Hahaha, panalo!

Those two are incredibly idiotic.

Nagsuntukan na lang sana.