One dead over LED headlight argument

[Ry_Tower]

Hindi pa nahimasmasan nung umuwi nang bahay?

via Imgflip Meme Maker

[KenGarcia]

Hindi pa nahimasmasan nung umuwi nang bahay?

via Imgflip Meme Maker

Kung ako yan uuwi nalang ako ng bahay and I will the live the rest of my life happy. YOLO!

[KenGarcia]

WTF is wrong with these guys. Mga professionals pa naman. Baka fan ng wild wild west type of palabas or movies.

Mababaw na dahilan para pumatay ng tao. SMH

[macsd]

WTF is wrong with these guys. Mga professionals pa naman. Baka fan ng wild wild west type of palabas or movies.

Mababaw na dahilan para pumatay ng tao. SMH

Ok lang yan para mabawasan ang mga tanga. Sana mamatay na rin yung isang tanga sa tetano. Professionals??? Baka sa kaladkaring school galing.

[BugleBoy]

Ok lang yan para mabawasan ang mga tanga. Sana mamatay na rin yung isang tanga sa tetano. Professionals??? Baka sa kaladkaring school galing.

The Engineer (Ardy Cristobal) graduated from Mapua. Has acted as Principal Engineer for some big ticket projects for major companies (HP, AshTech, etc.) in Singapore. The Lawyer, Nelson Belen has been a Customs Port Collector (Manila, Tacloban) for some time now. Nasabit na sa mga revamp na ginawa ni Pnoy at na-floating assigment. The lawyer is also known to own some nightspots in the Caloocan area.

[jick.cejoco]

Walang matalas na hindi pumopurol

[unmarked]

Walang pinipili ang road rage talaga. Educated or not. Self control ang true test.
Mejo OT: knowing na willingly sila nag duel, may laban ba yung namatayan sa korte?

[EQAddict]

Walang pinipili ang road rage talaga. Educated or not. Self control ang true test.
Mejo OT: knowing na willingly sila nag duel, may laban ba yung namatayan sa korte?

Paging Juan Martinez. What's your take on this? They both talked about a duel. Went back to the same spot. Both were shot. Can the survivor claim self defense? He did surrender afterall.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[XTO]

kaya nagpauna yung prof. shooter alam nya may laban siya depende sa abugado.

[niky]

kaya nagpauna yung prof. shooter alam nya may laban siya depende sa abugado.

Still a pretty stupid idea. What if the other guy didn't miss?

[XTO]

Still a pretty stupid idea. What if the other guy didn't miss?

No, if you're confident about your ability, it would be as simple. Notice how he retaliate and where is the patama?

[CVT]

Still a pretty stupid idea. What if the other guy didn't miss?

That's the popular story....

What if the Engineer did all the shooting?

And then shot his foot?...

"Dead men

Tell No

Tales...."

Investigation... Investigation... Investigation....


"The measure of a man is what he does with power" LJIOHF!

28.9K _/_/_/_/_/:waltz1:_/_/_/_/_/

[dr. d]

Walang pinipili ang road rage talaga. Educated or not. Self control ang true test.
Mejo OT: knowing na willingly sila nag duel, may laban ba yung namatayan sa korte?

keeping the gun at home is one way to dissuade road rage from escalating into something else. but in this instance, if the story is true, they went out of their ways to go home and get their weapons...?? clearly the intent to kill was there. blood lust! murder and attempted murder!
what were they thinking??!!! were they drunk? or was it a bad day at the office?

[XTO]

keeping the gun at home is one way to dissuade road rage from escalating into something else. but in this instance, if the story is true, they went out of their ways to go home and get their weapons...?? clearly the intent to kill was there. blood lust! murder and attempted murder!
what were they thinking??!!! were they drunk? or was it a bad day at the office?

sometimes, the ego and pride put you in delicate situation, maybe yes maybe the intent is to make "duro" or see if the other one won't show up and naturally he's the more "astig" but nagkasubuan na so ayun....sayang mga pinag-aralan nila

[yebo]

both of them went home to get their guns.

both had premeditated intention to kill.

one was wounded. attempted murder.

one died. murder.

it does not matter who shot first. both were equally guilty.

2 a$$holes off the streets.

unless of course the fiscal and the judge err in favor of money then it's only 1 a$$hole off the streets.

[Altis6453]

bobo ng abugado

+1 He SHOULD HAVE known better.

both of them went home to get their guns.

both had premeditated intention to kill.

one was wounded. attempted murder.

one died. murder.

it does not matter who shot first. both were equally guilty.

2 a$$holes off the streets.

unless of course the fiscal and the judge err in favor of money then it's only 1 a$$hole off the streets.

Yep. There is no case for self-defense as the element of unlawful aggression was not present. The survivor may be liable for the crime of Dueling under Art. 260 of the Revised Penal Code.

[machine.pistol]

Dueling is actually a crime. If it results in one getting killed, the other participant may be put in prison from a minimum of 12 years to a maximum of 20 years. Bilibid yan. There's no defense.

The engineer would probably be better off not admitting there was a duel so he could claim self defense.

[CVT]

Dueling is actually a crime. If it results in one getting killed, the other participant may be put in prison from a minimum of 12 years to a maximum of 20 years. Bilibid yan. There's no defense.

The engineer would probably be better off not admitting there was a duel so he could claim self defense.

The Lawyer took the first shot/s, right?

And the Engineer was hit on his foot/leg?

However, supposedly, he has his gun ready,- and this is a complication.... He could probably spin a story here...

"And who

Was wrong?

And who

Was right?

It didn't

Matter in

The thick

Of the

Fight!"



"The measure of a man is what he does with power" LJIOHF!

28.9K _/_/_/_/_/:waltz1:_/_/_/_/_/

[machine.pistol]

Yes, the better storyteller will normally emerge as the winner. But what is crucial here, if the story is to be believed, is that they first went home, presumably to get their firearms, to shoot at each other afterwards.

[Juan Martinez]

I heard this over a radio station this morning. Apparently after the argument the two agreed to a gun duel. They went home and come back to the agreed meeting place and shot each other. Pathetic.

news link from inquirer:

The police said that Belen stopped his vehicle and confronted Cristobal, complaining about the glare coming from his motorcycle’s headlight.

The two got into an argument, resulting in both of them going to their homes and returning to the scene with their firearms.

Belen fired first, hitting Cristobal in the feet, apparently to teach him a lesson, according to Bustamante.

However, Cristobal, a professional shooter, retaliated by shooting him thrice in the chest. He then went to the Police Community Precinct Station 6 and gave himself up.

Read more: 1 dead, 1 wounded as gun owners argue | Inquirer News
Follow us: *inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook

1) a newspaper report is hearsay. inadmissible in evidence unless the rule on "independently relevant statement" applies.

2) IF TRUE, violation of art. 260 rpc. no separate crime of murder. reason: double jeopardy.

3) another violation if true: comelec gun ban

4) IN COURT, it is not what you know, but what you can prove.

5) lesson: if you're a hothead, carry a gun and die early.

6) i agree with the opinion of altis and machine pistol, in the same way that if i had my wisdom tooth extracted i would see a dentist.

7) i would have agreed with the opinion of attorney but he was banned. i think his punishment was not commensurate to his offense. that's why i asked "what is the standard?" and that's why i lost a little enthusiasm to post.