Right now, I cannot divuldge the statement of other witnesses as these are critical on the case at hand. But to note, these statements are collaboraring with the one posted here in the forum. To clarify, I do not cherry pick the information to influence people in the forum but illustrated a eye witness statement with facts as shown on the picture file. Lastly, I guess you missed an important point on my response that there was a video evidence from a dashcam where the pictures has been taken and submitted as court evidence. Unfortunately, this video cannot be disclosed right now since the other party are still fabricating story about this case.

My point here is to inform other members to be critical on what they comment because a news article is not enough as a basis to judge a person.

Also, as I divulge these informations for other see the other side of story does not mean I am trying to get sympathy from others but rather trying to balance what has been written with information which the news article in the Inquirer does not have. I have spoken with the Inq7 writer Jodee Agoncillo, and her defense was that this was written based on what the CoP of Caloocan had inforn her. This means the news article was written on a basis of speculation and not by factual evidences.