
Originally Posted by
win23
interesting...
i do not see how the bank can re-possess the car since it was "misplaced"...
when you bought the car from the "original owner", did the bank approve of the transfer on paper? (i assume this is what bank confirmation means, right?) if not, then the owner of that car is probably still the first owner.
and when you sold the car to the third owner, did the bank approve on paper, just like it did with the first transfer? if it did, then the third owner is the only one the bank can run after.
but if all documents say you are the owner, then you are liable, sir.
in the trip to jerusalem, you ended up without a seat.
but i am curious... why is the original car owner still interested in the case? if he transfered all ownership claims to you fair and square, he should not be interested in the least anymore...
while it may be true that no one may be jailed for indebtedness in this country, i am curious as to how the bank may recoup its loan...
good luck, po.