OK, this is a healthy Argument, wag lang tayo lumagpas,
Mazda's Defintion is siguro spurt of the moment and Phil.based observation. which has valid points
Macky's as you can see well searched and everything...as very much have a point!!!
ang mali talaga dito is the Stupid Phil Taxation of SUVs, (gone are the 4x4drivetrain) that's why honda found a loophole of bringing the Gen2 CRV here at an AUV price (hindi ba kayo nasiyahan dun???)
kahit saan korte natin dalin CRV is always Classified as an SUV (small or mid)
now the question hangs with the new tax scheme, will HOnda Phils bring back the its 4wheeldrive of the CRV or continue the 4x2???
teka bakit ang everest?? AUV sya dba??gagawa ba ang ford ng everest dito sa pinas? kala ko thailand or indonesia un gagawin... ito tanong lang ah hehehe
Originally posted by Macky Unlike the USDM CR-V which uses Japan parts and is built in Japan, our local CR-Vs uses local parts for their suspension, transmission and body. Engine na lang yata ang completely built in sa Japan. FYI, the Philippines is the leading source of Honda's transmissions distributed in Asia (not sure yung outside Asia).
are you saying local parts? where it was produced then? if you're into steel business you will know that all materials was importing in Asia mostly Japan.
We knew for a fact that National Steel Corp.(NASCO) closed last 1998(correct me if im wrong) who used to be the solely manufacturer in d phils.
Now my question would be if CRV's uses local parts where is the source of their materials being use by them. For sure they also importing their materials.
Originally posted by rapeez are you saying local parts? where it was produced then? if you're into steel business you will know that all materials was importing in Asia mostly Japan.
We knew for a fact that National Steel Corp.(NASCO) closed last 1998(correct me if im wrong) who used to be the solely manufacturer in d phils.
Now my question would be if CRV's uses local parts where is the source of their materials being use by them. For sure they also importing their materials.
Originally posted by FrankDrebin ...Q: What if there is a rich who doesn't want those Suv's but settles for a Revo simply because he doesn't need a 4wd or he wants a low-profile image?
Is he still classified as a low-end to middle market?
The rich owner will not be classified as low-middle end but the vehicle sure is counted for. May extra pa sya para sa abubot na gusto nyang ilagay. :D
Honda did not make a mistake as far as classifying the CRV as an AUV. Diba bentang benta CRV? It was a good management move in my opinion.
AUVs are given tax breaks. Plain and simple. Buying an AUV doesnt mean you're a poor bloke. I have friends who can afford to live in Baranggay Ayala Alabang yet drive Revos. and besides, when was the last time an AUV cost nearly 1M?
AFAIK, the latest definition of the AUV is that it could seat 10 people. THis is unlike the original definition of the AUV na filipino designed.... even if only in part. Remember the Tamaraw, the Cimarron and the Fiera?