*alwayz_yummy: Matinding hirap maghanap ng SR16VE, and IMHO, it's not worth it. SR20VEs can be found, but they'd be expensive. At least with the SR20VE, you can make nearly the same HP (200 hp or more, with intake and exhaust mods) and all you need to do on the electronics side is use an rpm-sensitive solenoid to activate the "hot cams". It can use the stock SR20DE ECU... hehe.
Like I said, only one SR16VE has been rumored to have entered the country... and I'm betting finding parts will be hard.
As opposed to the SR20VE, which uses mainly SR20DE parts (and SR20DEs are common as dirt). In fact, even the common SR20DE is a good swap, because it has more torque than the common B16A, and given the same size car, with the same mods, they'd be dead even in 0-100 km/h. The B16A would pull away in the quarter mile, but it'd be very close.
And there's always the SR20DET swap. It'll cost more than a B16A swap, but engines are available, and it's 200-250 hp, unmodified. They're available here. Wag ka nang umasa ng SR20VET, as they're super-rare.
The MIVEC - Lancer swap is actually easier, as there are MIVECs available. I talked to one guy who managed to buy his MIVEC for the price of a SOHC 1.6 because the seller didn't know what it was at the time.The 4G63T swap is doable, pero those are hard to launch (too much power).
And there's always the Toyota 4AGE, 4AGZE and 20V swaps. These are easy, engines are abundant, and prices are lower than with Honda B16s. And one big advantage of the Toyota is that you can fit these engines to a RWD chassis like an old 70's Celica GT or a Starlet.
Actually, mukhang ikaw ang naaasar... Mazdamazda and orly aren't the same person, and though I haven't met orly in person (strange, since we're the two most prolific 626 owners on the board), I'd wager Mazda "Sam Milby" Mazda is cuter.
No offense, they're just saying Honda isn't the cutting edge, they're just the ones who were the most successful with the technology. Di bale na nauna ang Nissan, as Nissan only used the high-output variable valve system on relatively low-production SRs.
But VTEC isn't the be-all and end-all. VTEC's primary purpose is to maintain low-rpm torque while ensuring high-rpm power. NOT to create high rpm power. There were non-turbo engines that broke the 100hp per liter barrier before Honda, BUT they weren't very streetable due to poor low rpm running.
In fact, Honda VTECs are still pretty gutless down low. While I do love them, they didn't gain much acceptance in the US at first because of the poor torque curve. That's why some tuners here prefer the turbo-block Nissan SR20 or the Mitsubishi 4G63T for their cars. Ever hear of the Evo-powered hatchback? The one problem with the SR20DET and 4G63T in project cars is the axle-snapping torque.
Mazda's Rotary is actually a good comparison. The 13B Rotary has over 100 hp per liter and good low-end torque, and the naturally aspirated 13B isn't the maintenance nightmare that the twin turbo motors are. And (*alwayz_yummy) it can be swapped into a 323... but it'd be an expensive swap. Very expensive, with lots of fabrication.
Pero, in the end, the easiest project for the modern tuner is still the Honda B16A, as almost everyone knows how to swap this baby in, and Honda hatchback bodies are supremely light. Plus parts are everywhere.



The 4G63T swap is doable, pero those are hard to launch (too much power).
Reply With Quote




