There are workarounds on raising the car's ground clearance w/o making em look like crossovers, though. Mild upsizing of tires or the wheel-tire combo are a couple. I say mild coz one has to be aware of its effect on the speed & odometers. The other is the more complex air suspension...let's not go there.[emoji4]
One thing that's seldom discussed is the overhang, front & rear. The longer the bumper overhang from the tires, the more scrape-prone the car is. I do a lot of RoRoadtrips, hence, I go more for hatches...they have shorter rear overhangs, making em friendlier on ramps...esp when doing reverse entry on RoRos.... worse on high tide. Longer front overhangs will tend to penalize on ramp & speed-bump approaches. You can see the comparison here:
Hatches have the option of bigger cargo volume w/ rear backrests down, too. The hatch 3 was tested by a bud to fit a full-size mountain bike w/o wheel removal....before he jumped. He hates bike racks & takes his bike in his 3 every weekend for training. Here's what a hatch 3 can load....
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
I went to mazda today kaso walang totl m3 na avaiable so tinest drive ko yung m3 2014 ng SA namin totl. Ok naman drive nya tho parang comfortable ako sa civic. Na test drive ko but short lang yung 1.8E eh. Whats holding me on to M3 is the sunroof iloop and istop so logically kahit 2.0 pa sya mas efficient sya. Totl kasi so complete talaga. But i feel like mas maganda transmission ng civic. Dilemma talaga ako and we're kind of worried sa excise so dapat asap na sya![]()
1.8 yung Civic ko. I posted my FC numbers already which are actually better than my old 1.6 Altis. Also, hindi sumasabit Civic kasi mataas yung approach angle ng front niya, lalo na compared sa Mazda 3 Speed na may lower lip pa. Kitang kita naman sa pictures.
Matanong kita, anong bang mas feel mo right now?
Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk
Last edited by jut703; November 22nd, 2017 at 07:52 PM.
Ay sorry didnt check the username sir. Uhmm i actually like the civic. Kaso medo konti time and distance ko to test drive since stock yung tinry ko. Kaso totl ng mazda kasi yung other option which has all the tech esp iloop istop and sunroof. Ang ganda ng illumination ng sunroof kasi haha
My Mazda 3 has a sunroof. It was a fun feature at first, but in reality there's really not much need for it. The sun shines so brightly in the Philippines that you have enough illumination from your windows, and if you open the sunroof in broad daylight, sobrang init.
Nice to have though and it's a cute feature but not a dealbreaker.
If you like the Civic more, get the Civic. If you like the Mazda 3 more, get the Mazda 3.
Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk
i leave it open in the mornings 7-730am, glass and all...not that hot pa, gusto kong naiinitan ako sa mornings..
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tsikot Forums mobile app
My Mazda 3 2.0 is a 2004 model, while my Civic is the 2017 model. But I've also driven the current Mazda 3 2.0. Like I said in my previous post, the Mazda 3 is more engaging, the Civic is more comfortable.
I drive hundreds of kilometers a day with my Civic and it's not tiring to drive at all whether heavy traffic or twisty mountain roads.
The Mazda feels fast even when it's slow so it feels more exciting, the Civic feels slow even when it's fast so it's not tiring too drive. But like I said, don't be fooled by the Civic's comfortable ride - it can take corners as quickly as the Mazda.
Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk
The Sky tranny is among its strong points. Most enthusiasts & tranny rebuilders shun CVTs. The paddles are a convenience for passes & climbs. I had to gather OE parts to hook them up to our base 2 which came w/o paddles.
You can learn more about the Sky 6AT below...
Mazda's SKYACTIV
MAZDA: SKYACTIV-DRIVE | SKYACTIV TECHNOLOGY
Learn more on CVTs here:
CVT Transmission Pros & Cons | Certified Transmission Repair
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk