Ah, okay... now that the rest of the misunderstanding is out of the way...
What I meant is that the driving environment is relatively soft.
You can tell a lot about local conditions by the common car. US road conditions involve long, broad highways and long distance travelling. Thus, there is a premium placed on cars with good torque and long gearing, as well as a soft and cossetting suspension. Gas is relatively cheap, so engines tend to be bigger.
Japanese conditions involve well-paved but narrow and winding urban and provincial roads. Suspensions are stiff and tight (might be harsh and brittle for some), engines are smaller (for economy in urban conditions), gearing is tighter (in some cases, with second gear topping at under 50 mph, whereas most cars get over 60 mph in second gear) to maximize the power from the small plants. There may be a 180-200 km/h speedlimiter on the vehicle, to meet local regulations.
European conditions are a mix of the two. While you have long, well paved highways, which require long legs on even the most under-endowed cars, you also have small twisty roads, lots of them, which require a stiff suspension and good handling. Besides this, you have the ruts and potholes of third-world type roads in many coutnries, as well as tooth-rattling cobblestones, thus, this stiff suspension should also be supple.
*Philippine conditions are horrible, rough roads, tight, winding ones, slow traffic. We tend towards Japanese vehicles because of the size of the roads and conditions, but because of the axle-breaking conditions on some roads, as well as the possibility of floods and difficulty of maintenance in the outlying provinces, we tend to go for crude 70's style Japanese trucks. The simpler and cruder the diesel plant, the better...
Of course, that's not to say that all US, Japanese and European cars follow these rules, but in general, you can feel the conditions that they were meant for. And the stereotypes no longer apply to manufactured vehicles, as makers are increasingly looking at making them for the world market. Like you said, the Z06 is a class-beater, even by European standards, despite complaints by said Europeans about the super-Corvette's poor tractability (it's hard to read it when pushing hard, as it doesn't communicate as well as, say, a Ferrari).
Under 150k? That's too broad. And considering mass-produced is a relative term, you could include a lot of Nobles, Caterhams (they've sold a lot of them), Lotuses, etcetera etcetera that are ostensibly faster than the Z06 on a handling track, and cheaper... no special conditions to buy, either... but of course, on a fast track or a highway, they'd get blown away, and they're not as comfortable as the American super GT. But if we really want to get nitpicky, half the price of the Corvette will get you a nice GSXR that will out-accelerate anything on the planet.
Then again, while that makes the Corvette two times too expensive, it makes the European supercars look two hundred times too expensive. Everything is relative... :lol:
And take note, the differences in general driving conditions tend to be overstated by Euro-philes as meaning their cars are better. Which is bull. It just means that their cars are designed for a wider variety of road conditions than most. Which is why, since the 90's, US and Japanese automakers have been focusing on developing suspension tuning in Europe, particularly at the Nurburgring... as they've now found that if a car can drive well and fast on the Nurb, it can cope with nearly anything. The Z06 and a lot of the new Caddys have seen development time here.






Reply With Quote
